/g/ - Thoughts on zero trust architecture? - Technology

Anonymous

08/27/26(Thu)12:51:50 No.109662864

File: ZeroTrustArchitecutre.jpg (298 KB, 2617x1830)

298 KB JPG

Anonymous 08/27/26(Thu)12:51:50 No.109662864 Archived

Thoughts on zero trust architecture?

Anonymous
08/27/26(Thu)12:53:38 No.109662879

Anonymous 08/27/26(Thu)12:53:38 No.109662879

I don't trust it

Anonymous
08/27/26(Thu)12:54:57 No.109662898

Anonymous 08/27/26(Thu)12:54:57 No.109662898

>>109662864
99/100 sysadmins are too stupid to do it properly.
So we're stuck with firewalls that will... certainly contain the breach when it happens.
And it will because the developers would rather add 30 dependencies installing 470 transitive dependencies than learn the language they're using.

Anonymous
08/27/26(Thu)13:01:17 No.109662964

Anonymous 08/27/26(Thu)13:01:17 No.109662964

>>109662864
I hate having to click the "Sign In With PoopPee" and getting two redirects for every single service.
How about I log in once (to my OS account) and my compooter handles everything after that?

Anonymous
08/27/26(Thu)13:09:23 No.109663040

Anonymous 08/27/26(Thu)13:09:23 No.109663040

>>109662864
Needs hardware tokens for identity.

Anonymous
08/27/26(Thu)13:21:53 No.109663159

Anonymous 08/27/26(Thu)13:21:53 No.109663159

>>109662864
Platonic ideal of how networking should be constructed.

Anonymous
08/27/26(Thu)13:22:54 No.109663174

Anonymous 08/27/26(Thu)13:22:54 No.109663174

>>109663040
Hardware tokens are based ASF.

Anonymous
08/27/26(Thu)13:38:26 No.109663339

Anonymous 08/27/26(Thu)13:38:26 No.109663339

>>109663040
>trusts the hardware tokens

Anonymous
08/27/26(Thu)14:26:06 No.109663658

Anonymous 08/27/26(Thu)14:26:06 No.109663658

>>109662964
>How about I log in once (to my OS account) and my compooter handles everything after that?
My enterprise customers using Windows already have this. I think it requires using Edge though.