[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: xlibre25.jpg (257 KB, 1600x900)
257 KB JPG
>he uses this buggy AI slop unironically
how many of you fell for the meme?
https://forum.artixlinux.org/index.php/topic,10283.0.html
>Apart from that I was having problems with the bad quality of the xlibre code; while xorg is not perfect it is near rock solid stable. Xlibre was not and I spent a lot of work improving that by fixing bugs to keep these away from users in general and even more for Artix. I sent urgent letters to all three about the lack of xlibre quality but never received answers. That's when i decided to no longer hide the truth about xlibre's bad quality - we received many bug reports on it - andvexplained a few times in the Artix forum about the xlibre regressions and in those cases to use Xorg again. What I forgot to mention is that metux created huge numbers of commits using AI without checking them, but I never published that until here.
>>
Oh yeah we definitely needed a fourth thread on this
>>109663917
>>109664794
>>109655609



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.