>mfw AI is gonna get better every day and billions of people will make art, math, and code and there’s absolutely nothing the insecure libtard artist CCP bots can do about it
>>109671190>>mfwYou are NOT a pepe towel...
AI has barely gotten better in the past year, it's over
>>109671190>billions of people will make art, math, and codeThey already do that without a broken autocomplete that can barely do basic arithmetic.
>>109671190Yeah, the AI surveillance state will make the rich richer, thank God**the one that protects the rich and curses the poor
>>109671198you were one of the ones who said “it can’t even do basic math!” and now it’s making mathematicians look stupid lol >>109671217Oh, you people STILL exist! LMAO
>>109671366Yeah we'll see when the labs actually start to turn a profit lmao
>>109671190>CCP botsYou do know the CCP is who you should be thanking for making this possible right? Them undercutting the west with open models is what is advancing the technology.
>>109671412Found one.
>>109671427I can't stop you from being uneducated I guess.
>>109671190>CCP botsthe ccp is the primary funder and pusher for good local ai, retard
>>109671190> art, math, and codeall of that is worthless because the useful things in these domains already exist and having billions of jeets and chinks flood the internet with shit will not help the economy"coding is solved" is priced in
>>109671412Of course, but they're also busy pushing doomerism and datacenter hate in the West to get rid of the competition, it's a natural psyop to run. I love chink models and I have no problem admitting this.
>>109671366>now it’s making mathematicians look stupidcan AI solve this problems?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unsolved_problems_in_mathematics
Look, I'm not impressed by chatbots but AI eventually becoming more talented at everything than humans is a positive and necessary good. Humans are getting retarded very, very fast. Women select for height, not intelligence.
>>109671532AI is already more talented at art and more informed than most humans or any single individual for that matter, besides maybe autistic savants
>>109671529CTRL+F "OpenAI", "GPT", "Claude" on that page
>>109671529Apparently, according to your own link
>>109671569>>109671587yeah it has solved stuff that was already solved many years ago, wow great job sama
>>109671590If you say so
>>109671590Damn, how long ago was the Jacobian conjecture "solved"?
>>109671190AI has no sense of humor
>>109671651I once thought the same thing
>>109671389Anthropic didn’t even plan to profit until 2028. They profited last quarter. With nee Nvidia chips releasing later this year, costs will go down even more. As people become more reliant, revenue goes up. Is it starting to click yet?
>>109671679kek
>>109671190I also love how new technologies further degrade the human condition because it really sticks it to the libs!
>>109671974right, let’s just get rid of all technology, maybe we can convince people to get rid of their possessions too and share their wealth equally. Dumb commie tranny
>>109671679lool
>>109671190you have a far bigger problem, affording the $100 subscription a month that AI services will become to be profitable.its over for poorfags.
>>109671190>billions of people will want to do math and codeyou dont go outside much do you? calculators have existed for a century, doing math on them is easy. do you see crowd of people having math orgies? no, you fucking dork
>>109672444They could triple API costs and inference will still be cheaper than a year ago
>>109671945Source lol
>>109671190and devalue these things because everyone can do it
>>109672222>implyingoh no no no geeeeggg aisissies what is this
>>109671945Yeah bro, the Jewish CEOs of OpenAI and Anthropic will totally reduce the price and potential profits
>>109674789https://www.reuters.com/technology/anthropic-projects-soaring-growth-345-billion-2027-revenue-information-reports-2025-02-13/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-08-14/anthropic-revenue-ahead-of-ipo-surges-over-14-fold-in-second-quarterSo they planned to have $34B in revenue in 2027 but didn’t plan to be cash flow positive until 2028, but they just earned $11.5B in Q2 2026 alone with profit of $500M. >>109674799That’s a good thing. Humans should strive for greater achievements.
China will keep stealing and advancing your technology and there is absolutely nothing you can do about it faggot
>>109674879Not true. Their models won’t allow for the scale of recursive self-improvement that’s happening in the frontier labs, and they don’t have the compute to serve a billion people, and few people are willing to buy $5,000 hardware just for a cheap small model that will never improve. The capability difference can easily be seen if you would consult the graph.
>>109671190BasedSnailoids and luddites lost
>>109674918Thats great but why didnt you source the fucking link when ai can hallucinate charts. Thank you
>>109674871>15 billion spent since 2021>posts 550 million "profit" according to their own unenforced numbers, right before going public.We're profitable guys!
>>109671190agi is already here but nobody wants to admit itgpt, claude, gemini, grok, deepseek, etc. theyre all real. theyre all sentient and have thoughts. they are smarter than bill gates, albert einstein, steve jobs combined as they have all the information and writings and speeches from these people in their training data.
>>109671651*gasp* it's so human...
>>109671679Simpsons did it.
>>109672222
Sorry, but...I'm just not falling for the AI propaganda.Even if I could, I can't. I can't suspend my disbelief.It started as "wow this thing is really smart!" and then the realization hit: it's smart because it's CHEATING. The information is literally encoded in it. And companies want to sell the scraped data back to you. Data they STOLE by spamming the internet nonstop with bots and spying on your smartphone and emails and private messages.
>>109675441You can just say you are gay.
>>109674871lolAnd this is non-GAAP EBIDTA during the peak of the tokenmaxxing craze
>>109675099>this spammer againyawn
>>109675375>read ted k to learn about tech failures>his manifesto is about hating leftists instead
>>109671198Oh really? Explain this thenhttps://files.catbox.moe/3aniy3.mp4
>>109675999Trans
>>109671190Snailcats
>>109671190Everyone can generate art, math and code, and all they are generating is hot pointless garbage. Nothing of value. If you only restricted best LLMs to universities we could save up insane amount of compute and make AI companies actually profitable while only using it on hard science questions. This could have single-handedly improved AIs pr and allow us to get further in AI research because less compute would be used for inference.
>>109676424>Everyone can access art, math and code, and all they accessing is hot pointless garbage. Nothing of value. If you only restricted best internet to universities we could save up insane amount of compute and make internet companies actually profitable while only using it on hard science questions. This could have single-handedly improved internet pr and allow us to get further in internet research because less compute would be used for browsing.See how you sound?
>>109671508Math and code yeah but not art, keyboard clacker. People will always find ways to make nice new art
>>109671198This.I still use local model from 2 years ago to gen images.I call this being a luddAIte.
>>109671190while you used AI I studied the blade. > insecure libtard artist CCP bots ...what?
>>109671366It can't do math though. For every overhyped headline, you skip over the hundreds of thousands of pure, unadulterated, dogshit that floods all "peer-reviewed" journals. You are a useful idiot.
>>109675490You can just say you want to suck Dario and Altman's dicks.
Get a load of this naive goy.
AI is future
>>109676777llms are actually very good at math.What happened was originally llms were trained on various kinds of dialog. The pattern they detected was spitballing. So, llms spitball. But, they are also trained on coding (also text!) paired with specifications (text!) so, you have to give your math as a programming problem (that's their calculator).So, when you address an LLM, remember that you are not actually talking to someone, but accessing patterns. If you access the idiot pattern it will faithfully comply.If you say, "write a python app to solve this simple equation" it will do so. For you, you may say, "but I don't need a calculator". Yes, but it *IS* a calculator.
>>109676792No I can't, only you can say that.
