[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: truecolors.jpg (487 KB, 1769x929)
487 KB JPG
It seems, that samsung preserves true colors and detail better than iPhone or chink shit.
>>
>>109677783
you lose out in the market if you use preserve true colors because people prefer oversaturated photos.
>>
>>109677783
Bro who the fuck cares, we passed beyond the point of rapidly diminishing returns on phone cameras years ago
>>
>>109677783
>or chink shit
all of them are chink shit, what do you mean
>>
File: 1785461292244129.png (1.04 MB, 899x705)
1.04 MB PNG
>>109677783
>better than iPhone
not much of an accomplishment
>>
File: 1781778968331854.png (2.15 MB, 1759x1696)
2.15 MB PNG
if you want good pictures get a fucking real camera
>>
>>109678150
>zoom lens instead of prime
>good pictures
>>
>>109678096
now let's guess how many of those details were hallucinated by the enhancer
>>
>>109678278
it's optical vs digital zoom. samsung doesn't need to enhance anything there.
if you want 10x, get a camera with a 10x lens.
>>
>>109678278
I get why this is complete bullshit but who the fuck takes a picture of the moon anyway?
>>
>>109677783
>IDF used a S23 Ultra
Wonder what they used for the editing, Premier Pro maybe?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.