[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Why is this browser so slow and broken on Mac OS? You'd think Apple would want to actually be competitive with Chrome but even after all these years it still fucking sucks.
>>
>>109678640
Maybe stop being diseased poorfag quit using intel MacBook from 2016?
Refurbished m1 pros/max ver. are cheap now.
Just do speedometer test on m1/m5 compare it to chrome/firefox.
Also it has better battery optimisation when it comes to ARM.
>>
>>109678688
I have a Mac Studio with an M4 Max and 64GB of RAM and Safari slows to a crawl anytime you have more than a couple windows and a dozen tabs open.
>>
>>109678704
Try clean re-install of your OS, seems like specific you issue, also make sure all your usb devices are disconnected when you do that.
You can try this version of safari if you don't want to reinstall https://developer.apple.com/safari/technology-preview/
What ext. are you running?
>>
>>109678688
>Also it has better battery optimisation when it comes to ARM.
chrome beat safari years ago on battery optimisation:
https://blog.chromium.org/2023/02/do-more-with-chrome-on-single-charge-on.html
>>
>>109678775
>blogpost ≠ reality
Well the Indian CEO of chrome/google sells your data to companies, I would not use that.
>>
File: .png (239 KB, 1320x558)
239 KB PNG
>>109678688
>Just do speedometer test on m1/m5 compare it to chrome/firefox.
safari is around 25% slower than chrome
>>
>>109678848
>random image
>tested on iPhone pro max

Fuck off non white person, show an actual benchmark on m5 MacBook Pro.
>>
>>109678640
Works just fine for me. Haven't even touched Chrome since like 2019.
>>
>>109678793
>Well the Indian CEO of chrome/google sells your data to companies, I would not use that.
As if Apple doesn't, LOL.
gnu.org/philosophy/malware-apple.html
>>
>>109678640
Worked fine for me but I switched to Brave pretty much immediately because I don't wanna see ads. Before people sperg, FF+UBO isn't an option on ios.
>>
>>109678955
safari+ubol is an option tho
>>
Apple doesn't care about quality after Steve Jobs' death.
>>
>>109678640
what is slow and broken?
werks on my macbook pro m4 pro without any problems
>>
>>109678950
No, apple doesn't sell your data to companies for profit now fuck off retard.
>>109678955
>IOS
Desktop thread, there are Adblocks on safari, tard brown person.
>>
>>109678976
>No, apple doesn't sell your data to companies for profit now fuck off retard.
>Trust me bro, they don't
>>
>>109678974
He didn't specify any issue so it's 100% bait thread by linux-indians.
All vague threads are.
>>
>>109678978
Show me one case of apple selling data for profit go ahead, brown indian/pakistani/bangladeshi person.
google model is selling data to advertisers.
>>
>>109678974
all the things apple finally promised to fix for ios 27, duh
https://developer.apple.com/videos/play/wwdc2026/204/
>>
>>109678640
is there an adblocker for it?
>>
>>109679004
>iOS 27

Desktop thread, go back to indian/pakistani/bangladeshi phone thread.
MacOS and IOS are not the same thing.
>>
>>109678995
https://x.com/iHateApplee/status/1987508430752387258
Now stop shilling Apple, you fucking retard. You don't even have an iPhone. You are just psyopped into thinking Apple is cool and try to justify your pathetic existence.
>>
>>109679019
>you don't even have an iPhone.

It's literally desktop thread you indian/pakistani/bangladeshi person.
Go back to your phone thread.
>>
>>109679038
yeah, what the fuck is wrong with this retard posting iOS here when it's clearly about macOS
>>
>>109679038
You don't own a Mac either.
You still didn't ""debunk"" my claims either.
Your only hope is ad hominem.
You are poor and will never own a single Apple product.
Your existence is pathetic and unjustifiable.
You should kill yourself.
>>
>>109679052
Most pathetic samefag I've ever witnessed desu.
>>
>>109679064
>More cope and projection from brown/indian/pakistani "person".

Still can't provide single benchmark when it comes to performance/battery efficiency and browser not selling data to advertisers.
Don't care.
Also, been using desktop mac x86 and later arm since Mojave came out.
>>
>>109679104
>Still can't provide single benchmark when it comes to performance/battery efficiency and browser not selling data to advertisers.
It wouldn't matter because you don't own a Mac anyway.
>>
File: 1781492996877522.jpg (46 KB, 279x400)
46 KB JPG
>>109679114
How would I know about safari technology preview version if I didn't owned and used Mac you retarded indian/pakistani/bangladeshi person?
>>
>>109678640
> competitive with chrome
People already forgot chrome was written largely by apple when a non-technical advertising/data-selling company took webkit (safari) and cloned it, changed the name to “chrome” to make it “more portable” … then made it less portable .. and here we are.
>>
>>109679128
>How would I know about safari technology preview version
Larp.
>you retarded indian/pakistani/bangladeshi person?
>desperate ad hominem
>>
File: average apple seether.png (544 KB, 765x417)
544 KB PNG
>>109679164
No you are absolute bottom of the barrel poorfag indian/pakistani/bangladeshi "person" who tried to slide this thread into iPhone discussion.
Apple devices are cheap now, you can buy m4 minis for $500, brand new m6 one is $899.
I've been using macOS desktop version since Mojave.
Prakesh Sukdek, you still didn't provide real benchmark when it comes to battery efficiency, performance on desktop apple ARM devices.
Still no real case of apple selling your data for profit to other companies, LOL.
>>
>>109679214
>Apple devices are cheap now, you can buy m4 minis for $500, brand new m6 one is $899.
Yet you still don't own one.
>I've been using macOS desktop version since Mojave.
Lie.
>Still no real case of apple selling your data for profit to other companies, LOL.
So you agree Apple sells your data for profit to other companies?
>>
File: average apple seether.png (336 KB, 495x330)
336 KB PNG
>>109679227
Incredible showcase of butthurt and projection from pakistani/indian/bangladeshi person.
I get it $500 is too much for you.
There is nothing to agree on, you can't point to single case of apple selling data to other companies.
I am not using vishnu google chrome that sells all my data to make money, fuck off.
>>
File: copeprojector.png (62 KB, 300x300)
62 KB PNG
>>109679274
>>
File: average apple seether.png (606 KB, 719x501)
606 KB PNG
>Saarrr you don't own apple device!!!
>Saaar the performance of chrome is better (provides iPhone benchmark???)
>saar let's talk about IPHOONE!!
>Saaar you never used desktop Mac!!!
>saaaar IOS/MACOS are the same thing!!!
>saaar please redeem google chrome so my entire village can scam call you all day please saar...
>saar how dare you use safari!!!
>>
^^^^^^^^^^^
obsessed
>>
>>109678976
>No, apple doesn't sell your data to companies for profit now fuck off retard.
Apple sells your data to Google who then does that. It's is the weakest link in Apple’s overall privacy stance. Google generates so much money from search through user tracking that Apple would consider contrary to its own internal values. If Apple were to run its own search engine, it would be far more private than Google Search. But instead they partner with Google, set Google as the default for Safari on all platforms, and share in Google’s profit to the tune of around $20 billion/year.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.