Better at less cost! What do we think, friends?
>>109704612It's over.
>>109704612What about energy efficiency? AI companies should include that in their benchmarks.
>>109704826would never happens. if energy & cooling is included they'd get luigi'd really quick
just like GPT-5 was supposed to be
>>109704826The more energy used, the better. If people living near data centers can't survive technological progress like this then maybe they should just die.
>>109704612>irrelevant, incremental gains in the old estabilished benchmarks>sudden jumps in the new literal who benchmarks
>>109705332I love the noooticer
>>109705332I remember when they showed Opus 5 blowing Fable 5 out of the water in their cherry picked benchmarks, except it's schizophrenic in practice. I'm trying out Fable 5.1 right now and I'm not seeing any difference yet.
>>109704612Hell yeahNew vibeGODDING MODEL JUST DROPPED, this is a new vibeGOD victoryExpect trans snailcat seethe
spoopy
>people still use Claude when even chink models btfo it's noisy nonsense.
>>109704612China shitting itself rn
>>109705546those distillation attack vectors that anthropic just patched [1] where publicly known for weeks. chinese already distilled fable 5 a long time ago.[1] https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/models/fable-5-1/whats-new-fable-5-1#breaking-changes
Models hit a wall, next capability jump is swarms. We need to spin up an artificial society to figure out how to implement shitty apps.
I just use Sonnet 5. What am I missing?
>>109704612how much does "less cost" mean when talking about claude?
>>109704612epic marketing threadSirs... is le Altman /our guy/? Mrmmm i thinking e = mc^2 + AI
>>109704612nigga ai is boring now no one gives a fuck except web3 shitters
>>109704612When will they release mythos? Is mythos even real?
Is there any reason to use Fable for just rewriting Perl, Python, Bash and Lua?
>>109706566its fable. its just fable without the lobotomy nails
>>109706605I'm trustworthy anthropic-kun... please let me take the guardrails off...
