Technologically speaking, what would be a good proper replacement for the upvote/downvote system?
>>109704915Go back to troondit.
>>109704915here it seems they do recognize some "right" to payment for intellectual outputs even if it can be duplicated infinitely and nearly no cost
>>109704915Rods from God targeting specific pieces of computer equipment that a person is using
>>1097049151. Pay per account 2. Add pay to ban That way if someone wants to keep annoying turds out, it should be a team effort since many people will find them annoying. While the annoying person will have to keep paying over and over again to be annoying... I guess he could crowd fund that as well. Nevermind then.
>>109704915The mods should be replaced by a benevolent all-knowing unbiased AGI
>>109705060Just the first one would filter 99% of shitters, not just on reddit but on any other space out there as well. SA did the right thing by making you pay for an account to post in the forums.
>>109705090I knew a goon in college. dude tried to convince me to sign up for like two decades to keep the ruse going. lmfao
>>109704915You can either be poor or dumb, but not both. Learn to pirate.
>>109705060Retarded system that'll just lead to scam bots being favored
>>109704915perfect reason to never port your game to any language other than English
Maybe like, a downvot makes ur post smol and a upvote mades ur post bigger and if u get enough upvaots ur post takes up the whole screen
>>109705085Nothing is unbaised.AGI will never be real.Plebbit will never be good.
>>109704915
>>109704915Outlaw GUIs and advertising outside of specific physical magazines, the rest will take care of itself.
>>109704915We keep the system. But require internet id for everyone. Indians get no upvote/downvotes under any circumstances. That little tweak alone solves 99.9% of all problems.>>109705090And allow government funded jews like the ADL to shill the site and take over.
upvote goes in the comment section. downvote goes in the options field
>>109704915Do this.Or better yet kys.
>>109704915no rating system at all, i dont care what lurkers think
>>109704915Upvote/downvotes all require captcha unless the account is paid. Your upvotes/downvotes are public.
>>109707037>screen moving independently of the actual inputWritten in python for sure
execution by firing squad
>>109704915(you)’s
>>109707210this
>>109704915>Support the artist!>Support the developer!Have never known one of these people do be an artist or a dev, but they love to identify with random groups if they just lecture people on the internet to support X.
>>109704915Buttons to Mimic/finesse . Mimic is roughly equivalent to a like. Finesse is like a downvote but it implies you have the vote thats betterThis was chosen as prior to the age of information mimicry often meant survival, now with everyone mimicing being table stakes with the internet survival comes from finesse not mimicry
>>109704915One thing I've noticed is that in the absence of a rating system, people are more inclined to share their opinion, be it positive or negative.It makes sense, it's easier to somewhat convey your opinion with one button press than actually writing something, even if it's just "Lol, good one" or "Kill yourself"I've never felt this site was particularly negative, you get called a retard when you're being retarded, but it's just as easy to get praised when your post deserves it (it's funny/helpful/insightful/etc).X, and other sites with only likes/upvotes/hearts/whatever positive button-equivalent, are what in my opinion, bring out the worst in people. Users with a positive opinion of a post are encouraged to signal this with a like, but because there's no equally easy negative signal, people with a negative opinion are more likely to convey this via a comment.So, if you asked me how I'd replace it, and didn't give me the option to remove it, I'd do the opposite of X: You can only downvote/dislike, this would encourage positive reactions to be expressed via comments while encouraging negative reactions to just be an abstract number
>>109704915A "meh" button
>>109704915Anything is better, literally anything. It's horrible system made to control and promote fake consensus. I hope we see someone with money do the same thing Elon did with Twitter.
>>109704915(You)s
What would 4chan be like if you could see how many yous someone has gotten
>>109708243gay and retarded
>>109704915Dowboats onlyYou shouldn't be praised for an average or good comment; that should be the norm and baseline and thus you can't boost a particular post for stealth ad-bottingYou should be buried for shitposts
>>109704915the traditional five phases system
>>109704915getting called a faggot and being told to return from whence you came
But it does exactly what it's meant to do, allow mods to control thought and punish dissent.
>>109704915only have an amount of quoted.if your post is good, extremely funny or spectaculary bad, it will be quoted for years.it's all useless though, (human)bots ruin everthing
>>109705060metafilter is pay per account
>>109708333The state of american border patrol
>>1097075894chan = ludditesrest of internet = AI GODS
>>109704915P1,624 converts to 28.50€...entitled mudhud brownoids
>>109705060steam makes you pay $5 to post in forums. it filters a VAST number of bots.i would add a 3rd counterpoint: a counter-ban. if a user is banned from a subreddit, they can pay to reddit to get unbanned, or even pay a monthly subscription to get ban immunity for certain communities.it wouldn't stop trolling completely, but it would turn ragebait into revenue for the website without relying on gay targeted ads and data scraping, and it would mean that only the truly dedicated and vindictive would bother trolling
>>109705090>SA did the right thing by making you pay for an account to post in the forums.which led to it getting taken over by the most mentally ill trannies one has ever seen
>>109708647Kys
>>109708778>t.
>>109704915Upvoting is fine but it shouldn't have any effect on the comment visibility.
>>109707589>4chan>free speechSAY. HIS. NAME.
>>109704915>Technologically speaking, what would be a good proper replacement for the upvote/downvote system?Not using one in the first place. Those just create echo chambers and dog-piling. Set up your own chan board or forum.
>>109704915make it cost real money. first vote on a topic costs a penny, next one costs two, next one costs four, etc.
>>109706581Chad
>>109708469i would get paid to do thatgo away jotogo away joto
>>109704915thhe upvotes system was perfect when you could see both upvote and downvote count, you could easily spot fraud/rigged/manipulated comments, one of the reasons they removed it when intelligence agency shillng started
paginated chronological order
>>109704915maybe it could be improved by not hiding downvotes and sorting by up+down votes, instead of just up votes. the whole voting system is hivemind echo-chamber though
>buy?
>>109704915Upvotes only. Remove downvoting. Mitigates people from suppressing the opinion of others. Also prevents commentors from getting salty since they won't see all of their negative comments.What youtube does.It's not what a lot of people want to hear, but it's the correct answer.
>>109704915>Technologically speaking, what would be a good proper replacement for the upvote/downvote system?(you)
>>109711589Youtube has an internal updoot/downdoot system. Their AI moderation sees if you post an "offensive" comment and shadow bans it.
