There's no reason for more than 1 programming language to exist. We should just make one perfect language and use it for scripts, websites, microcontrollers and everything else. No need to relearn syntax and rewrite libraries and ecosystems over and over again. It could have every single modern language feature, a garbage collection toggle, a dynamic typing toggle, and a compiled toggle
>>109714131Have you ever heard of the 2 language problem? You need 2 languages dude, an scripting language and a compiled one for any system. The problem is the industry lack of incentives to move forward.
>>109714131
>>109714156>2 seconds slower than me with a lower quality versionngmi
>>109714165Shamefur dispray on my part, so I'm glad you delivered!
>>109714131I use Claude to port both of those to Perl. Same goes for any Rust code I find.
>>109714131>We should just make onethat doesnt work like that, i dont agree your thing is better than my thing. you should kneel to me, then, "we", otherwise - "you">garbage collection toggleeasy, a nothingburger even>dynamic typing toggleretarded>compiled toggleretarded and impossible. the effect is achived by doing extensions.>No need to ... rewrite librarieslibs purposed for runtime are really different built than purposed for binary utilization..heres last quote from Torvalds> the only case shared libraries really make sense is for truly standardized system libraries that are everywhere, and are part of the base distro. [ Or, for those very rare programs that end up dynamically loading rare modules at run-time - not at startup - because that's their extension model.want git to get python repo? have to get perl. thats where wespeaker's philosophy ends.
>>109714131With LLMs, I agree. Chinese. It is way more natural fit than English for large language models. Chinese as a prompting language, then the LLM reason and output binary.
>>109714131If you posted this image in a non ironic manner, consider never touching a computer again
>>109714131>>109714155We need more programming languages and standards, if there were only one, Google would probably control it
>>109714131>Requires Windows hosting environment.>PythonWhat kind of AI slop is this?
Whats going on in this thread is everyone a bot? OP's image is pure slop
>>109714131>We should just make one perfect languageIt exists and its name is Ocaml
>C# complexityI almost spit my drink out laughingLOLWho enjoys working on enterprise applications?
>>109716400People who wanna earn money. Average C# dev probably earns thrice as much as your average embedded shitter.
>>109714221thank you for your service
>>109716528To be fair, embedded is far more scalable if you actually work on something important.Ranjeet Cantfindmyshittingstreet writing the firmware for $20 microwave ovens? Not so much.
>>109714131Your image is basically all wrong except maybe a couple of points.
>>109714131It already exists. It's called Assembly. Learn it.
>>109714221does perl have any cool shorthands and syntactic sugar construct to make working with text very easy?
