Redditors crashing out now that LLMs can use tools like Microsoft paint and blender to create art and no longer are required to use diffusion.
>>109749148>im 16this pretty much summarizes the whole Luddite artist cult
>>109749148it'll just draw the same shitty obvious ai-slop mistakes it does for almost all art but manually
>>109749148Diddy bluds having a melty ahhhh
>>109749148Link to miku? I need miku sauce.
>>109749148Cute miku
>>109749164Ask your AI to draw it.Who needs sauce? The future is now, old man.
>>109749169Thanks!
>>109749164Here's the video of LLM drawing it https://x.com/qibiz_me/status/2096000743786627103
Call me back when AI can replicate tails gets trolled soulful ms-paint tier drawings.
>>109749197>You just hate horses! Stop buying cars!
>>109749204Luddite cuck faggot bitch moron.
>>109749153It's always kids trying to "rebel" against popular thing. It also explains why so many anti-AI fags only care about dumb shit like AI art and ignores how widespread AI is being used for coding and more practical tasks.
>>109749213Stop using lightbulbs! Candle hater!
>>109749208took the words right out of my mouth
>>109749241is that why you’re jealous of the geniuses and wealthy capitalists who brought AI into the world? Oh… suddenly you don’t wanna talk about envy anymore, huh?
>>109749241Yeah we should ban Washing machines.I'm so jealous of women. Lol not.
>>109749258Making money isn't a skill? Faggot.
hope the mass suicides start soon
>>109749200Don't these types hate cars and suburbs
>>109749266Hollywood and California should go first. They always screamed the loudest.
>>109749148>let’s not generate stuff and brute force LLMs to do shit that we hateThat’s redundant when you really think about it.
>>109749148these people complain because no one is hiring them for their shitty art but then they insult people who don’t make their own art because they’re lazy or lack talent. Essentially they’re just mad that other people have fun making things with AI. And that seething will never go away. Truly a miserable existence. Then again, it’s probably just the angsty teenage rebellious phase and later on they’ll grow up and understand how the world works.
>>109749335>Truly a miserable existenceSounds miserable to hate someone for simply not wanting to use current thing but you do you Altman.
>>109749383>I despise ai art>I hope they broke both their hands>soulless idiotsyeah bro, this totally sounds like a healthy individual who just wants to opt out of the current thing.
>>109749148>Redditors crashing outSeems you're logged in, would you like to stay there?
>>109749404>wah I’m a victimMaybe if you weren’t such a fag this entire decade you wouldn’t be getting that kind of traction. All you had to do was shut your mouth but no, you needed to be hostile.
>>109749148>I want to protect the profitability of the hobby that I turned into a job like a total dumbassArt is not a job and you are not entitled to profitability. Spreading the fruits of skill gain without having to gain skills to as many human beings as possible is an objective good. It allows more content to be created.>Inb4 but its slopSo is the majority of the human race, but if you're not willing to agree that we should nuke all the thirdies to prevent the human species from being ensloppified then you deserve no sympathy when you complain about AI causing art to be ensloppified. Either vote in a proper ethnostate and protect the value of a thinking human being or fuck right off with your protectionist bullshit, you can't have it both ways.
>>109749415seethe lol
>>109749335>later on they’ll grow up and understand how the world worksBold of you to think that they will be allowed to simply hide their past, walk off and move on. Nah, even if they try deleting everything, it's still out there and they are still getting slaughter-droned in their face when the time comes. Every single one of them.
>>109749420Like you? Nah.
>>109749423I think a better scenario would be to force them to make the best art as if their lives depended on it or torture them to death. And then to force them to do the worst kinds of physical labor that robots aren’t capable of yet, just to train them how to do it. And then they can be killed, knowing that they everything they did was for the benefit of AI.
>>109749431>overwork Everyone to death or dieYeah because that work out great when most companies did it.
>>109749431>make the best art as if their lives depended on it or torture them to deathThat's already useless as by now even the best they can ever produce in their lifetime is still worse than AI. Second one is also very impractical as they are completely incapable of doing any of the other work with reasonable quality. Thus, going straight to the 3rd step would be the the optimal solution.
>>109749463>drawEw, that's something only niggers do these days
>>109749217yep. thats why everything turned gay. the soilennials rebelled against the culture of straight white men
>>109749474Why do I need to see some retarded cope?
>>109749148idgi at all ai being good at a thing you do doesnt mean you cant still enjoy said thing. i love programming and still program only use ai when there something i cant be bothered with
>>109749458Yes, very true. Maybe there is some other use for them, like throwing them near wildlife predators just to observe animal behavior. Or psychological experiments, bio-treatments and so on. We need human lab rats to explore cancer cures and what not
This is just queer rhetoric for straight people who wish they were gay
>>109749495Despite how much I want it to happen as soon as possible, it still most likely happening sometimes after all deceases are cured (still, not too long from now). Most likely way of using them is as something disposable to test different "what if" situations. Like throwing one into the space, making them fight each other to death, etc.
>>109749148>electronics becoming cheaper, ie accessible to all? based>internet becoming accessible outside of universities? based>youtube having guides about everything imaginable, thus making any odd repairs or even education accessible to all? based>ai sloppa making "art" accessible to all? OMG YOU ARE LITERALLY HITLER IF YOU USE IT
>>109749148>no one is born with artistic talentthat's what you tell kids so they don't become depressed and give up on life
>>109749610huh? what do you think "accessible art" is?everybody had access to art already. even disabled people.
>>109749635"art" you can create yourself without spending years acquiring the necessary skill, i thought it fairly obvious given the topic at hand but perhaps you struggle inferring extremely obvious subtext
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gGLvg0n-uY
>>109749651bro got so angry he did the ad hominemso you're telling me it was weird that people had to have skill to make good art? and now, you apparently don't need skills to make "good art"?
>>109749660No, it wasn't weird, it's how life works. But technology tends to solve some of those roadblocks over time, and AI solved needing years of effort to create a decent image the way you want it to.Artists getting uppity about proles suddenly having access is no different than medieval scribes and monks getting mad at the printing press.
>>109749682kek it's always gatekeeping due to profit motivejust look at practically any guild in the middle ages that would send fucking assassins after people who were spreading their sekrit knowledgeai sloppa creating shitty furry porn doesn't stop you from drawing shitty furry porn, mr artist. if it's your hobby keep on keeping on. if you want to pay your bills with it, well, time to get a real job like the rest of us
>>109749682the thing with genAI right now, is that they were trained on data which the owners didn't have consent to. so, people who did work for years had their work stolen, so that retards can make "art".other than this issue, i don't care what an artist uses to create art.also, having access to making decent images with one prompt doesn't make you an artist.the artists getting uppity are still artists, meanwhile the AI gang think they are chefs after using a microwave.
>>109749717the work wasnt stolen you cant steal something someone puts up on the internet for anyone to look at
>>109749717>muh copyrightnigger do you know where you are? go cry to RIAA and MPAA>meanwhile the AI gang think they are chefs after using a microwave.and why is this an issue if it makes them happy? 'artist' is a meaningless term
>>109749739public accessibility on the internet doesn't grant exploitation rights. before you talk about something, do some reading about it. or ask one of your "AI's.
>>109749746>"idc about copyright, everything must be free!">defends billion dollar companiesdo you see how retarded you are? or do i have to explain?
>>109749765>public accessibility on the internet doesn't grant exploitation rightswell it clearly does, given that the courts in US decided that AI can legally train on those works
>>109749765This is my image.I drawed it
>>109749765most art is derivative and based on previous works characters themes and styles, from what youre saying this is all theft. wanna draw a character from your favorite show/game. its theft because you've looked at something but it wasn't provided for you to copy. learning how to paint by looking at paintings of other artists in school. theft. those are for you to look at but not to copy they never wanted you to do that. this is all "exploitation" whatever that means kek
>>109749772Explain to me as if I am a little child why I should start giving a single fuck about copyright (because ai bad?) when I disliked the very concept of it all my life
>>109749773okay, name the case. i'll wait.
>>109749781i said you're retarded, i didn't say you should care about copyright. you probably do nothing with your life so it won't benefit you. we all can see that, anon.
>>109749793the one where claude had to pay a fine for pirating booksthe court agreed that training on the material was legal because it was transformative workthe fine they received was for pirating the books in the first place, which is why ai companies now buy physical books to scan them so it's above-board
>>109749800>i didn't say you should care about copyrightI'm glad we agree that copyright is a retarded idea and that shit on the internet should just be freely available to do whatever with, whether it's music, movies or your shitty furaffinity content.
>>109749807>buying a physical book lets you scan it legallythat's not how copyright works. The First Sale Doctrine lets you own the paper, not make unauthorized digital copies. scanning a physical book into a commercial AI dataset is still reproduction infringement.
>>109749148>bro, just spend a decade learning to draw
>>109749818lmao what are you talking about? is this an attempt to twist my words?i said YOU naturally don't care about copyright, since you do nothing with your life.do you have any work you can show us?
>>109749148>crashing outif you could stop with the twitch brainrot memes that'd be ideal
>>109749200Going by your metaphor the difference is when cars were invented they didn't cause a global shortage of wheels due to all the car manufacturers hoarding them.
>>109749820alternatively you could just google it and see for yourself>The First Sale Doctrine lets you own the paper, not make unauthorized digital copies>scanning a physical book into a commercial AI dataset is still reproduction infringementwhich is why they scan it to use as training data (transformative, allowed) and not publish the originals or add them to some commercial AI dataset that they'd never publish anyway because training data is kingthis of course caused people to get up in arms about ai companies destroying books because omg muh books you're doing a fahrenheit 451 I haven't bought a single book all my life but what if I suddenly wanted to, but that's another topic
>>109749148>crashing outWhat race were they in?Not going to read that temper tantrum of a post. If you like drawing, then draw and fuck what anyone says or does. If you do it for attention find another hobby you actually enjoy.
>>109749148Anti AI is the new woke, it's hilarious seeing all the redditard cope as it gets more advanced every yearEven if it's worse for everyone overall because it will turn all media into safe generic bullshit
>be a luddite>come to /g/ - technologyidgido you also go to /o/ and advocate public transportation and to /k/ to advocate for disarmament?
>>109749844confusing reproduction with distribution under 17 USC § 106buying paper gives you ownership of the physical object, not the right to digitize itmaking an unauthorized digital copy is copyright infringement the second it hits the drive, whether you publish it or notgoogle books only passed fair use because it was a search index showing tiny snippets, not a commercial model generating market substitutesthomson reuters v. ross explicitly ruled that copying copyrighted works for AI training is direct infringementanthropic buying physical books was a litigation mitigation tactic to dodge piracy claims, not a court-sanctioned loopholepost a single docket where a US federal judge granted a blanket exemption for commercial paper scanningyou can't because it doesn't exist
