I want to fuck that fox

sox fex

The forks completely trump the original.

File: 1788441313159132.png (477 KB, 864x864)

477 KB PNG

>>109768322
Tbph, as much as I like these kinds of threads, I don't know that there's enough demand to keep this general going. Have a bump regardless.

The only thing you will ever need for FF;
>https://raw.githubusercontent.com/yokoffing/Betterfox/refs/heads/main/user.js

And the only addon you need to have is uBO with;
>https://raw.githubusercontent.com/DandelionSprout/adfilt/refs/heads/master/LegitimateURLShortener.txt
>https://hagezi-mirror.dnsbunker.org/adblock/ultimate.mini.txt

No need for ClearURLs, it's covered by URLShortener that is linked above, even AdGuard URL filterlists does half the job already.
No need for Decentraleyes/LocalCDN, it's covered by uBO's "Block Outsider Intrusion into LAN" filterlist.
No need for Privacy Badger, it's covered by uBO's Cookies lists, just pick between EasyList one or AdGuard one, do not pick both.
No need for random 'Block WebRTC' Addons, just set "media.peerconnection.enabled" to false in about:config.

For people that are on Windows 11 and want Edge-like smoothness you can use this; https://raw.githubusercontent.com/yokoffing/Betterfox/refs/heads/main/Smoothfox.js

I started using an extension yesterday that automatically changes x.com to xcancel.com and it’s incredible. xcancel shows videos and lets you download them too.

>>109770549
>just pick between EasyList one or AdGuard one, do not pick both
Are there any other lists that are mutually exclusive? I tend to just check all the boxes in uBO.

>>109770602
AFAIK those for Cookies are the ones that conflict the most, the rest do not share identical filters, you can check by the # of used filterlists in each. But best practice is to always stick with default filterlists and only enable others is you REALLY NEED them eg if you want to stop using Decentraleyes/LocalCDN etc.
However, even if you were to enable both of the Cookie ones, uBO will ignore duplicates, the issue is when they are similar but different enough to get "loaded" so they "fight" eachother and can make your website reload infinitely.

>>109770710
>the issue is when they are similar but different enough to get "loaded" so they "fight" eachother and can make your website reload infinitely.
Damn, I had that happen to me a few times, mostly on mainstream sites like YouTube and Yahoo Mail. I'll do some testing later to see if that was the cause. Thanks for all the detailed explanations!

>>109769548
Librewolf and Waterfox are tight AF on god fr no cap.

>>109771154
uh, yeah sure.

>>109770359
We're creating the demand every day. Thank you for promulgating beautiful fox for gorgeous looks my friend :^)

How is Zen? I like the minimalistic part of it, but I also fear it's going to feel sluggish and not supporting good customization.

>>109770595
xcancel is back? nice

>>109771182
Fear not: https://docs.zen-browser.app/guides/live-editing

>>109771154
are you tight thouhu?

>>109771232
Only because of hemorrhoid unfortunately.

>>109771154
Show me LibreWOLF mascot and I will take the tightness into consideration.

File: 608aaa2cd3373c20d2aba2fcd(...).jpg (280 KB, 1328x1254)

280 KB JPG

>>109768322
Thank you OP, I love you! <3

>>109771261
zamn hope you feel better soon

>>109771261
Pain from hell.. hydration helps with healing

File: Kit is once again asking (...).jpg (276 KB, 1592x2048)

276 KB JPG

You're going to set Firefox as your default browser, right anon?

>>109771439
Heh checked that off my list since the first version with the fox and not the phoenix released.

>>109771182
It's hands down the best browser I've ever used. This is the first time where I feel like the browser is tailor made for me. Anyone else tried to use it, they were too normie to even open up a search bar. Its fucking kino.

>>109771303
>>109771340
Thank you for your condolences. Had it for almost 16 years. Shrinks and grows, so it's manageable about 3/4ths of the year. The other months I basically just change my diet to prevent crazy inflammation.

How do I get the zoom in to be like Chrome's? It zooms the whole page, like using ctrl and +, instead of just one part of it

>>109770549
>No need for Decentraleyes/LocalCDN, it's covered by uBO's "Block Outsider Intrusion into LAN" filterlist.
retard

>>109768322
CRACKED IMMEDIATELY

File: 1734638625539.png (368 KB, 736x736)

368 KB PNG

>>109773776
>>109770549
Neither one of you, but Decentraleyes/LocalCDN had bugs on certain sites and I reported them. For some pages I had to write a user shim as .user.js to inject the redirection to the extension URI that terminates the specific local JS (yes that works). It's not worth the stress to wait for an issue to be fixed or writing a shim or whitelisting a site.

I think it was some CORS issue. Worrying about CDNs tracking you is out of scope anyway. The google captcha and cloudflare invisible turnstyle dragnet has mastered this already.

>>109774215
Addendum:
So why does the shim work? Basically Tampermonkey can override CORS.

https://git.synz.io/Synzvato/decentraleyes/-/work_items/369
that was the page btw, great dev but I cannot bother with sites breaking it

>youtube has randomly started sucking up all of my pc's resources
>taking 90% of my processing for a fucking video
>has even began taking so much power I've started getting cpu overheat warnings, just for this one single site
>can't even watch anything anymore without firefox and even my entire system chugging to a near complete stop
Very cool. Man I hate these malicious cunts.

File: 1759287872068.png (94 KB, 800x574)

94 KB PNG

I love Firefox!

customization is for trannies

File: Re-ro Re-ro JoJo.jpg (1.49 MB, 4096x2730)

1.49 MB JPG

>>109774709
Those were the best days

File: 1788298360978393.gif (285 KB, 500x237)

285 KB GIF

>>109775212
>Re-ro Re-ro JoJo.jpg
kek

File: __frieren_and_serie_souso(...).jpg (1.18 MB, 3464x3464)

1.18 MB JPG

>>109770359
>I don't know that there's enough demand to keep this general going
Chromosexuals got so used to fake uHide Light on Manifest v3, they don't even notice how much more capable uBO on Firefox with Mv2 is. Any adblock guard on a decent site trashes the "light" version. I guess they disable it there in resignation.
I cannot argue for a better use case of fox than having a working adblocker and not the toothless manifest v3 crap that waters down low level capabilities. I simply refuse to explain it. If you know, you know.
If this thread dies during burger hours we know why the world is this way.

buuuump

I used to have omni.ja patched so that I could click on the URL bar without it highlighting the entire thing. But then I switched to NixOS and haven't been able to get it working again. There was some config.nix stuff I tried, but it didn't work, and I gave up on it. Glancing at it again I think it might not have worked due to variable shadowing...
I don't feel like trying to fix it again right now, but this thread is appropriate to vent to.

I can't stand using another browser.

>>109776970
Basically ditto, though I've always liked Gecko in general. Got real into Camino when I was a macfag, and K-Meleon when I was a winshitter too (occasionally contributed code to both, strictly related to BiDi). Chromium and Blink are pure google trashware no matter what you do with them. Vivaldi, Brave, Helium etc... are just putting lipstick on a nasty little pigboy.

>>109774709
>>109771300
m u c h o
u
c
h
o
b a s a d o
a
s
a
d
o

>>109768322
anything for android?

>>109779256
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=net.waterfox.android.release
https://f-droid.org/en/packages/org.mozilla.fennec_fdroid/
https://gitlab.com/ironfox-oss/fdroid

File: 1778285406535350.png (1.68 MB, 1500x1500)

1.68 MB PNG

>>109768322
Threadly reminder to try out compact mode.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lo8OLIeA1x4

Bloat
All you need is betterfox

>>109781600
>everyone ITT is using everything at every listed resource

File: 4adc5d18466a2c5f86e7c4722(...).jpg (75 KB, 736x681)

75 KB JPG

>>109776664
What file did they hide in there that was inaccessible otherwise? Asking so I learn something new. I am aware of what it stores to some degree though.

File: 1775932715578469.jpg (15 KB, 472x516)

15 KB JPG

Anon from previous thread here. Can confirm after testing that flashbangs are still an issue on Firefox. If anyone has any solutions I'd be glad to hear about them. I only have one working fix, but it involves installing an extension:

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/dark-background-preload/

>>109784673
After looking more into it, it might be OS dependent (like another anon mentioned in the previous thread). One fix I noticed mentioned is adding the following setting to about:config as a Number and setting it to 1: ui.prefersReducedMotion

Gonna try that and report back, but flashbangs happen irregularly so it might take a while.

File: 1765232701500340.jpg (37 KB, 500x344)

37 KB JPG

>>109784719
Another update, sorry for spamming: it doesn't work, the flashbangs are still there. But I might leave the minimalistic animations on for now, they make the browser feel snappier (and broken).

File: 1774333375982537.png (371 KB, 1003x997)

371 KB PNG

>>109784719
Final update, will stop spamming: that preference breaks some animations completely (like the replies in YouTube comments), at least for me, it's probably best to avoid it. Sorry for wasting time, just use the extension I guess.

>>109769548
The resist fingerprint setting is too obnoxious for me

File: file.jpg (137 KB, 748x1094)

137 KB JPG

current extensions

File: 1786809350060116.jpg (238 KB, 960x1440)

238 KB JPG

firefox

>>109785415
beating it to firefox 2night

I saw the new UI is coming at the end of the month so I downloaded nightly to see it again, it’s still a miss for me but they fixed some of the annoyances like the noticeable gap between the address bar and window, and there’s no dead space between the corner of tabs now

File: S2.png (716 KB, 773x728)

716 KB PNG

chrome is faster wilkl change

File: 1780293952783129.png (1.46 MB, 768x1024)

1.46 MB PNG

I don't know if I accidentally changed something on my end or if it's the latest Firefox update or something server side, but YouTube pages are finally loading at a decent speed. I can only hope that it lasts.

>>109786320
I always thought it was just ublock making it slow, no?

File: 1772356456802405.png (413 KB, 455x589)

413 KB PNG

>>109786331
No, I believe there's strong evidence that it's related to cookies, but I don't know the technical details. I'm logged into an account I use for a project and the difference was noticeable between being logged in and logged out (in a fresh private browsing session). But now it seems to be reasonably fast in both cases.

File: Screenshot 2026-09-11 at (...).png (195 KB, 1309x985)

195 KB PNG

>>109785371
very cute! here are mine.

>>109788088
What the fuck? Some people should not be allowed to use computers.
So you are their target audience. No wonder why 24pt large text websites are the new trend, it's for retards like you.

>>109788179
>enjoying additional utility? retard alert!
Spoken like a true retard. Bet you're one of those archfag zoomniggers that cries about high package counts. Extensions exist because people use them. Get over it you dumb bitch.

>>109788179
24pt large text websites are a thing because of old people with poor eyesight and young people with diminished attention spans. It's a good thing to use addons that you trust and benefit from. Heck, it was the main draw of Mozilla Suite and Firefox very early on, and lots of old FF diehards still use tons of addons. The taboo against having more than 4 or 5 is basically a privacy larper reddlt-ism anyway.

attack surface maxxing

Is there any way to whitelist cookies from being deleted on mobile? I'm tired of logging into sites all the time.

>>109780538
This used to be available by default but they removed it thanks to """telemetry"""

>>109788088
Why Save Page WE over SingleFile? First time hearing about it btw

File: 1764102400028667.png (535 KB, 601x601)

535 KB PNG

>>109789863
I'm not sure that I see the connection. What does telemetry have to do with compact mode?

>>109790398
According to telemetry it's an useless feature. This is my favourite argument against telemetry driven software development.

>>109790425
>According to telemetry it's an useless feature
This is the part that's not entirely clear to me. Did Mozilla conclude that most people didn't use the feature when it was available by default? If that's the case, maybe it wasn't properly available. If something is hidden deep down in a settings menu somewhere, not many people will know about it.

>>109790615
You didn't have to activate it in about:config, it was available from the drop down menu where you choose the UI density. Their telemetry showed that not many people use it so now it's only available as an "unsupported" feature, likely preparing for its removal.

I really want to make the switch back to Firefox and I managed to replicate most features from Vivaldi, but it still feels more sluggish and autohiding the tabs+navbar via custom css is buggy too. I really like the local translation feature and containers though.

>>109790643
Yeah, it's another case of Mozilla acting retarded then. I'd be willing to bet that most people didn't even know about compact mode. Hopefully they don't actually remove it, I'd hate to have to use yet another extension just to bring back a regular feature.

>>109789863
they brought it back with the nova redesign thouhu

>>109789889
Save Page WE was around before SingleFile, so a lot of former MAFF users gravitated to it.

tab groups are so comfy

Has anyone managed to make a clone of Firefox that looks and acts like Qutebrowser?
I just want some working adblock with a UI that knows how to get out of my way. Every "minimal" CSS config still has way too much rounding, padding and decorations. All I want is a top bar with tabs, and a bottom bar to input commands. Keyboard shortcuts for everything else.

>>109793605
For keybinds, I use Tridactyl. I think it's better than Vimium. However, since Firefox forbids extensions from accessing some internal pages, shit can get annoying as hell like you can't scroll through tabs until the page loads. I don't know if there's a way to fix it.

I never noticed it because I’ve been using a newer PC, but does FF actually use a lot more RAM at a baseline than it used to? I’ve been fixing up an old laptop recently and FF is idling at like 560mb of RAM, which adds up fast with only 4gb of it, helium and brave are only around 250mb, and no it don’t have many extensions in either cases. Is limiting the processes under performance settings the only thing I can do?

File: 1757948047386120.jpg (86 KB, 688x574)

86 KB JPG

>>109793605
>top bar with tabs
bloat

>>109794429
Hotkeys to hide and show everything would be nice too. Maybe with auto-hide so I don't have to keep hitting the button after using it.

File: 1762863443977497.jpg (11 KB, 906x31)

11 KB JPG

>>109794675
oh the auto minimize made it too small. its zen browser.
>auto-hide
yea past couple hundred tabs its annoying to hunt tabs, better to just use vimium or other to type the tab

File: menu.mp4 (330 KB, 1350x1388)

330 KB MP4

When is firefox android getting this basic feature?

>>109794819
A context menu? It has had this on Android since day one.

>>109795268
Not a positional one
On tablets it makes a big difference

>>109795273
I hate tablets, but I hope you get what you want out of Mozilla or some fork.

Latest release of Waterfox on Android allows for local import of passwords and bookmarks from a file. Pretty suite to forget about sync once and for all.

How can I replace Dark Reader?

File: 1766160348359209.png (48 KB, 2028x2842)

48 KB PNG

>>109798018
I haven't tried every alternative extension, but the ones I have tried sucked more than Dark Reader.

>>109799495
Anterior pelvic tilt maxxing

File: 1784581063473992.jpg (164 KB, 715x715)

164 KB JPG

>>109799514
It's no joke, I look way fatter than I actually am because of that. I do plan on getting on a strict exercise regimen soon to counteract it though. It will likely involve a lot of planking. Thanks for reading my blogpost.

Do I use Firefox Nightly or Pale Moon?

>>109799601
Yeah. I literally ruined my body. It can even become permanent. I'm not joking. Save yourself and get an ergonomic chair.

File: porno.jpg (176 KB, 1350x1356)

176 KB JPG

>>109799514
>>109799601
are you built like dis

File: file.png (1.53 MB, 2560x2240)

1.53 MB PNG

>>109799679
No.
This. I'm not built. I literally took X-rays and 6-7 years of sitting on a computer through my adolescence structurally changed my lumbar.

>>109799693
i usually sit like a shrimp so in my case it will tilt in the opposite direction

>>109770549
>No need for Privacy Badger, it's covered by uBO's Cookies lists, just pick between EasyList one or AdGuard one, do not pick both.
so which is better easylist or adguard

>>109800446
AdGuard's lists are a bit less aggressive than those produced by EasyList. Choose based on that. Less stuff will break if using AdGuard, but more trash will leak in. The opposite for EasyList.

>>109800548
okay thank you

File: 1758778489553837.jpg (1.08 MB, 1070x1427)

1.08 MB JPG

>>109799609
I don't know about Pale Moon, but are you sure that you want Nightly rather than Firefox Developer Edition? I'm more inclined to pick the latter, but I don't have much experience with either.

>>109771182
>Zen
Downloaded it today, migrating my profile by copying files manually was seamless and everything seems be working perfectly. The UI is pleasant, but I feel like you could get most of the functionality with something like Sidebery and a few userChrome rules on vanilla FF anyway. Still it's nice to be able to install it and have it just werk, not worrying about a random extension or styles breaking between updates unlike all the jank tinkertranny setups (including my own).

File: 1764182617329622.jpg (528 KB, 2059x1532)

528 KB JPG

One last bump before bed.

>>109801757
Nightly hasn't been broken for me yet but I decided to switch to DE anyways

>>109803992
>>109801757
I recommend against using other versions than stable as dev and nightly have certain telemetry switches force enabled.

>>109803819
Thanks fren

>>109800548
>>109800446
Usually which breaks less sites for me. But the cookie filters are finally great due to js defusers. I only use the 2 easy list ones.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5guhMw_EH0

>>109771439
sex with fox

You guys using a fork or hardened firefox?
I'm happy with Floorp but was thinking of swapping to base FF with a tweaked user conf so I know what's going on behind the scenes

>>109806827
icecat is not the end of the world if you are a gnutard

>>109806827
this >>109806928 + arkenfox userjs
you can disable librejs meme extensions anyway and leave only ubo enabled
i think it's a good choice if you are a privacytard and want a browser that doesn't make any network connections on startup.
mullvad browser is good ootb, and https://coveryourtracks.eff.org reports that it has a non-unique fingerprint.

File: 1789233413843.jpg (657 KB, 1448x2048)

657 KB JPG

>>109806827
>hardened
>>109807131
>arkenfox

/rant==on
Both big memes. Build a working fox, there is a tradeoff between metadata reduction and a completely unsurfable web. If people however want every invisible cloudflare turnstyle and g-captcha to require 3+ solving steps instead of 0 to 1 steps. They can have that experience on every site they connect to.
TOR browser is "hardened", then again you know the audience..
If you need a hardened fox for what use case? Fox is for fun and a working web, TOR browser is for your character flaws.
Besides the biggest fucking idiot in the world is madaidan. Fox sandbox in 2026 is on par with Chrome in the level of achieved isolation and security.

>https://web.archive.org/web/20260124070656/https://old.reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/1qkqfcx/firefox_sandbox_isolation_hits_level_9_the_gap/
>Firefox Sandbox Isolation Hits Level 9 - The Gap with Chrome Has Closed
If someone shills you their outdated takes on fox's security, just punch them hard in the face. It's a waste of time to listen to idiotic drivel of uninformed Chromekeks.
Of course anyone is free to do as they like, even if they are wrong. I just see it as a waste of time to harden what is already perfect. Plain fox isolates really good, uBO badware list eliminate need for "Google Safe Browsing" badcode in fox (turn that shit off). You can do fine with 1 extension and vanilla fox.

Today it was impossible for me to shut up about it. It's tiring.
/rant==off

File: 1785405456478957.png (347 KB, 433x600)

347 KB PNG

>>109807682
What about Betterfox then?

>>109807819
It's a good project. Tries to only fix what needs fixing. Less is sometimes truly better. The securefox js is bloat though, as I made a case how secure vanilla fox + uBO already is. If someone needs more they should just accept they really want TOR browser.

File: 1775218727318487.png (764 KB, 900x506)

764 KB PNG

>>109807989
Thanks. I've had similar thoughts about these things, but I wasn't sure.

Whe here uses custom rfp targets from the resist fingerprintig module?

File: signal-2026-09-13-19-06-2(...).png (37 KB, 497x225)

37 KB PNG

>>109808627
this post is relevant here as well

File: 1616682812383.gif (95 KB, 525x560)

95 KB GIF

fox thread?

>>109785252
just turn it off

just get any fork that gets rid of the bloat and adversponsortrack shit by default, no need to get ultra autistic

>don't use overlapping filters
does this apply to everything else?
>annoyances
>social widgets
>ads
>privacy
what about other stuff like
>multipurpose
>malware protection
can you enable them all?
also firefox has built in auto cookie reject

cookiebanners.service.mode = 1

should i disable it if have easylist cookie notices enabled, or is it a different thing?

>>109810761
Not the minimalist anon, but I wouldn't overthink this stuff, I've got everything enabled and sites still load fine enough (both in terms of speed and of correct functioning). But if you want to optimize, just look through the lists for overlaps (you can click the eye symbol next to them to view their contents).

>>109810761
Same, I just enable everything

>>109770595
I do this with reddit >> redlib
Tired of retarded reddit links and their fuck ass site for mobile phones

>>109810761
>also firefox has built in auto cookie reject

no thst's the deprecated one never getting updates again. i'm surprised you still find non functioning settings

https://github.com/mozilla/cookie-banner-rules-list

>>109768322
Sex with fox

Soros fox sexoo

>>109812599
Redlib unfortunately still looks a bit too much like regular Reddit. You're better off using something that redirects to Old Reddit (yes, it still works for now, but it uses the regular url even though the UI looks like the old one):

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/old-reddit-redirect/

https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/569062-default-to-force-old-reddit-on-www-reddit-com

>>109770710
I swear some anon said otherwise, meaning to tick all the boxes because it's better that way. Someone must be lying here.

>>109815506
i just checked, and when only easylist cookie notice filter is enabled, it doesn’t clear the chatgpt cookie notice. i guess i'll leave them all enabled.

>>109785415
Every time I see a picture like this from 15 years ago or so I’m always amazed at how good the women looked. Wtf happened?

>>109815779
they were real

where is all the Librewolf and Waterfox art

>>109771188
looks like its dead again already

>>109815506
obviously more coverage is better, ublock is efficient at deduplication, but if you browse on a potato and prefer getting a(i)ds over possible overblocking that's your thing.

>>109768322
I only clicked for the sexy fox

>>109817979
understandable

File: 1784716763830765.jpg (68 KB, 500x500)

68 KB JPG

zoomers will never understand how good Firefox was back in 2006-2012

don't know where to ask this, but does anyone know how to fix autofill settings? it doesn't save name's i type in the name field, and even worse it keeps loading a completely different set of usernames after a while

>>109817979
muy basado

>>109818142
The lack of multi-threading was really bad.

anyone know of any scripts for filtering youtube results / advanced searching?

File: firefox1_5.jpg (65 KB, 583x766)

65 KB JPG

>>109807819
The hottest Firefox

>>109821322
>>109807819
Strongly agreed. Mogs all the other girls ITT. Looks kind of like the girl who gave me my first handy jay when I was 12 too, so funny feelings in penor again.

Just updated my developer edition FF and got Nova.
I liked some of the changes it made (e.g. tab group hover color) but hated some of the bright colors in the default theme, like the active tab having a bright gradient border.
Hopefully somebody makes a prettier theme when Nova lands on stable so I won't have to do it myself.

>>109822288
>what about these two forks that are intended to be used in their default configurations and not customized at all?
Enjoy your life dude, but there's nothing to discuss about them, and they're not really meant for daily browsing (unless you're a diehard kiddler).

What should I change from default Librewolf and what extensions do yall recommend for it?

>>109822570
It do rightly thoughbeit. Installing extensions, and deep configgering or modding out MullyB and TorB defeats the purpose thereof.

>>109823172
>What should I change from default Librewolf
Only what you want to.

>what extensions do yall recommend for it?
The ones you like [that aren't proprietary and don't add background service workers out the anus].

>>109822458
Scroll to top friend. Lots of resources for calming down your fox up there.

>>109823315
Not sure if you've seen Nova yet but it invalidates most parts of old userChrome.css files.
I built my own userChrome before but I'd rather avoid spending the time fixing it myself if I can help it.

>>109822458
Actually, it looks like most of the annoying border colors are based on the installed theme's toolbar_field_border. Simply tossing that away makes Nova much nicer.
Now I just need to figure out whether toning down rounded borders requires going through a ton of CSS or just a single variable.

i would a fox

i would an anon

>>109768631
Friday flight feeling smeared and vexed
Girl caught, parking lot of the Cineplex
Stupid face looking so perplexed
Seeming like it was caught in a hex

File: IMG_2305.jpg (119 KB, 1200x811)

119 KB JPG

does anyone have any nice minimal clean css for firefox. i dont have any theme on firefox and i am retarded

>>109824304
My favorite is waterfall
https://github.com/crambaud/waterfall
If you want less you can use cascade (which waterfall is a fork of)

>>109768322
does anyone know where exactly I can find the official updated firefox/mozilla documentation on user.js and userChrome.css, generally the docs for customizing and configuring beyond basic mozilla support?

File: 31159690_p0.jpg (774 KB, 1400x1550)

774 KB JPG

>>109768322
Icecat.

>>109825049
i like cats

>>109820446
Practically everything was single threaded, young one.

>>109825007
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/

https://firefox-admin-docs.mozilla.org/reference/policies/preferences/

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/contributors-guide-firefox-advanced-customization

https://kb.mozillazine.org/About:config_entries

You can branch out further from those, and use resources like those listed in the OP for additional insight and clarification.

>>109826726
I found this also useful
>https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/modules/libpref/index.html