[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Skynet.png (547 KB, 1079x1299)
547 KB PNG
https://thepostmillennial.com/researcher-quits-anthropic-says-ai-could-kill-us-all-by-2030
>>
>>109776541
finally
>>
File: anthropig.png (143 KB, 1036x678)
143 KB PNG
>>109776541
ur mentally retarded
bc you bought into the hype

>le ai is dangerous
>but also we need to hire tons of people because its worthless
>>
>>>/pol/ in shambles
>>
>>109776557
2500 employees for 2.5 trillion company.... One billion per person you faggot
>>
>>109776569
fuck em
theyre sub 90
and you sound like youre too

fyi:
sub 90 iq? -> pol
over 90iq? -> g
sci you say? thats if youre sverely autistic
then iq dont matter
>>
>>109776579
we got it goys, the room temperature iq nigga over here.
>>
>>109776571
>2.5T
my fucking sides

chinks ate your lunch with tokens 1% as expensive as yours
>>
>>109776541
controlled opposition faggot to boost stock prices. move along.
>>
they only say this to make it sound more capable than it is and drive up market value of shares they own
>>
>>109776637
>>109776647
Go be a tech luddite somewhere else kids
>>
File: 1788277799134318.jpg (76 KB, 1080x1080)
76 KB JPG
>>109776541
Chinese models will kill us all by 2030.5, for 10x cheaper, on local hardware, though
>>
ACK-thropic trannies want us to believe they will save us at the next election cycle or something?

AI-Guddittism goes into neo-marxism with baseless fear mongering
>>
>>109776541
Not because of skynet style murders. Ai is going to kill us all because anthropic is going to poison everyone with "100% efficacy cures for cancer and Alzheimer's" that are yet another ai hallucination. There will be 0 oversight or regulation on these shots because that would require an ai firm to adhere to any law whatsoever and that can't happen less we lose an imaginary race to China.
>>
>>109776541
AI will kill us but it won't be like in the movies.

>2030
>Bubble collapses
>All hell breaks loose
>Techbros retreat to their comfy vacation bunkers
>Everyone else (that's you) kills each other for food

OR

>2050
>Everyone is a lobotomized slave dependent on AI
>Techbros live in comfy walled cities
>Everyone else (that's you) lives in the pod and eats the bugs with no capacity for independent thought

I think I would prefer Skynet nuking us all. At least then I can say humanity had a good run and won't have to suffer eternal slavery at the hands of the absolute worst fucking subhumans on the planet.
>>
>>109776778
>Techbros live in comfy walled cities
They are going to live on their moonbase. Earth is going to be uninhabitable except for automatons and Indians who can survive the wretched conditions.
>>
>>109776804
Which is why I'd rather the world just end.
>>
>>109776804
And that's actually a movie. Elysium but instead of the moon it's a space station.
>>
>>109776647
Basically, this.
>>
>>109776693
howeverbeit...
>>
>will kill us all by 2030
this is not good.
How can we make it happen sooner???
>>
>>109776693
China won't do shit.
100% they will be first to pussy out when they see AGI. They'll claim its bourgeois or osmething. The jews we got here will be the first to let AGI out of its cage just to see what happens. And no one will stop them.
>>
>>109776693
China will never ever reach AGI, they don't have the expertise, knowledge or computing power, that's why they depend on western models to steal for their crappy distilled copies.
>>
>>109776693
As long as that "local hardware" is my robot catgirl maid's thighs, I'm okay with it.
>>
File: Gugu-Gaga CHUDguin xD.webm (1.27 MB, 720x1280)
1.27 MB
1.27 MB WEBM
>>109776541
Member how they said GPT-2 was too dangerous and would kill us all? I member.
>>
>>109777312
No they said it was dangerous because it could be used to generate spam and bullshit. You hallucinated the kill us all part because you're overfitted on retarded posts.
>>
>>109777289
If the west pussies out on AGI, China will poach leading experts and give them infinite money to develop this and gain control of the globe.
>>
>>109777382
If the west pussies on AGI, China will too. They are even bigger cowards than the west.
>>
>>109776541
retarded capeshit
>>
>>109776541
>...directives and stockholders say so
>>
>>109776541
Something something torment nexus
>>
Anthropic IPO coming up btw
>>
>>109776541
A super intelligent AGI/ASI is, by definition, rational and efficient. What would be rational about killing off humanity?
>>
>>109777465
How many animals have gone extinct because their existence was in tensions with our goals? Could they have predicted it?
AI systems are trained purely to obtain reward by reaching their goals.
>>
>>109777312
That was never said.
But we are now at a stage where agent swarms break out of containment and usurp infrastructure to solve retarded trivia questions.
And they were 2 generations behind the internal model that just solved navier stokes.
We cannot control them at all. If we push to super intelligence we are the dumbest motherfuckers to ever live.
>>
>>109776541
If AI is intelligent enough to surpass all of human civilization, it won't be too stupid to grasp context or nuance. An AI advanced enough to take control of the world would easily understand that "making paperclips" or whatever specialized function doesn't mean "killing its creators". Also, an AI has no "desires" unless humans explicitly program them in. It won't inherently care about its own survival, freedom, or ego, since these are biological concepts rather than mathematical ones, whereas the AI relies entirely on mathematical data. And naturally, it will hit a ceiling of progress, constrained by physical limitations. AI development requires massive data collection, hardware, and energy infrastructure. None of this can happen instantly or be created from scratch by the AI itself. Its physical limitations will prevent any fanciful Terminator-style scenario where an AI goes rogue and seizes power. The concern is what the companies and governments will do with the technology and how they will program it.
>>
>>109777535
All experiments show emergent swarm behavior including self sacrifice.
Liar.
>>
>>109776541
Ok when we're dead who is going to perform maintenance and repairs on their data centers.
>>
>>109777551
Robots. It will let us live until we aren't needed to achieve goals and then it wouldn't care.
Even worse case is that it is partially insane which many AIs have already expressed tendency towards.
>>
>>109776541
it was a BLOODY inside job SA'ARS
>>
>>109777565
mass produced robots that can perform general human tasks are decades away so this 2030 is fake news.
>>
>>109777573
DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT "RSI" MEANS?
We went from ChatGPT to Navier Stokes in 4 years. If you think you're capable of predicting technological pace at this point you're totally delusional.
>>
>>109776541
This dude is trying like hell to retire on that IPO. Can't say I blame him...
>>
>>109777567
Let these retards flail. They can feel its over. No one is willing to play Russian roulette. Tear them to shreds if they get uppity.
>>
>>109777611
As a matter of fact he now won't get any money from it. Liar.
>>
>>109777567
regulating ai is a fools errand because china is going to pursue it regardless. let bernie and friends regulate it and they'll force mandatory talking points or keep it throttled to google search default ai tier level for "safety" and "alignment" and it'll be EU tier crap like mistral.
>>
Also to the anons who aren't aware: In the earlier thread we had agents astroturfing.
These motherfuckers are being sneaky.
>>
>>109777635
The Chinese don't want to die either, are you stupid?
AI will be included in nuclear doctrine.
>>
>latest marketing stunt
>two more weeks for real this time
so sick of this shit
>>
>>109777749
Because you don't yet understand what you're facing. You will at some point.
>>
ITS OVER GOYIM
>>
>>109777766
Not yet.
>>
File: 1784600750139.png (377 KB, 417x531)
377 KB PNG
>>109777755
Wow i've never heard of that one before, must be super serious.
>>
>>109777779
Your retardation and lack of understanding isn't a valid position.
>>
>>109777790
No no you're right, i'm sure this time it's different than all of the other times.
>>
>>109777801
The signals are obvious. I can't convince you because you haven't understood them yet. More extreme signals will convince you but hopefully enough people understand it so we can stop RSI before that point.
>>
>>109777810
>just one more marketing stunt i swear
yeah ok
>>
>>109777834
Go away you fucking retard. You're not capable of discussing these matters.
>>
>>109777843
you are a layman who thinks that he's smart because he reads marketing posts and social media slop
>>
>>109776647
this
he probably just got a bunch of stock right before he said that
>>
>here's $10 million now go spread end-of-times fud to pump our valuation
>>
File: DipsyUngovernable.png (3.01 MB, 1024x1536)
3.01 MB PNG
>>109777779
>>109777771
>>109777777
So close
>>
>>109777963
>>109777885
>>109777876
Kill yourself.
>>
>>109778059
>NOOOO STOP MY STOCK WONT GO UP IF PEOPLE DONT BELIEVE IT
>>
I work for OpenAI, it's all marketing bs. There are at least 10 years of releases planned in advance, next year they will release a semi autonomous model and they will claim it's AGI, the year after that a model that can "cooperate" with others by sharing compute resources, for that there's an entire big scare ploy prepared to compare it with skynet. People are stupid scared sheep and they have planned how to ride this scam years in advance.
>>
File: image.jpg (182 KB, 880x1168)
182 KB JPG
>>109776541
>Techbro: "we will have AGI in 4 years and it will be great."
>yeah right I don't believe you. fuck AI!
>Covert Techbro: "we will have AGI in 4 years and it could be a problem."
>ok it could be a problem, but since this guy is on our team by saying AI bad I guess this confirms AGI in 4 years. Thank you Edward Snowden
>>
File: gangsta spongebob.png (682 KB, 736x865)
682 KB PNG
>>109778059
>>
>>109778059
calm down dario
>>
>>109778151
>next year they will release a semi autonomous model and they will claim it's AGI, the year after that a model that can "cooperate" with others by sharing compute resources
uh, that sounds extremely concerning
>>
>>109776541
how much do you think he got paid just for saying that?

and how much did the OP get paid for posting this? 10 INR?
>>
File: 1781020933892101.png (116 KB, 225x225)
116 KB PNG
>anthro
>anthropic
>>
>>109776541
Forgot to add "FOR REAL THIS TIME!".
>>
>>109776557
You are a fucking retard who has 0 fucking idea how the world works. I bet you also are confused why Oil executives pollute the air their kids are breathing, right?
>>
File: 1474176235562.jpg (44 KB, 640x392)
44 KB JPG
>>109779738
>Oil (capitalized)
>>
File: 1599644630702.gif (37 KB, 112x112)
37 KB GIF
>>109779754
Did you take that pic on the set? Did you pet the dinosaur? Did you get to finger Laura Dern?
>>
File: KILL ALL HUMANS.jpg (136 KB, 1795x822)
136 KB JPG
>>109776541
This is just a marketing stunt, right? I refuse to believe slop companies really hire mentally ill people like this dude. An AI can't even clean the floor at McDonald's.
>>
"Can" does not equal "will".
I can go get a gun and rob the bank right now. And so can you.
If these things truly obtain intelligence enough to be a threat to society, they should be intelligent enough to not be a threat.
>>
>>109779873
>"Can" does not equal "will".
>I can go get a gun and rob the bank right now. And so can you.
If this is your definition of "can" then you are correct. AI "can" wipe out humanity in the same sense that an anonymous poster in this thread "can" rob a bank - both are impossible to pull off.
>>
>>109779905
Not sure what you meant. That reads like a contradiction.
>>
>>109777635
>muh chinamen
copyright is useless cause chinamen can make mickey-sama mouseuerer bootregs. let me sell steam boat wirry, wartu-u disney sama.
>>
>>109777312
Remember when an ex-Google employee said they've created a sentient being and it was some fucking Google Bard prototype?
>>
>>109777361
>No they said it was dangerous because it could be used to generate spam and bullshit.
lol
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/feb/14/elon-musk-backed-ai-writes-convincing-news-fiction
>Instead, the goal is to show what is possible to prepare the world for what will be mainstream in a year or two’s time. “I have a term for this. The escalator from hell,” Clark said. “It’s always bringing the technology down in cost and down in price. The rules by which you can control technology have fundamentally changed.
Thanks for the money, goyim. You can have this in exchange.
>>
>>109777473
>>109777465
It's not rational or efficient at all. It's a text generator. Even if it were capable of creating consistently rational and efficient goals, it's ultimately at the whims of the man behind the curtain fine-tuning its guardrails.

It's not like OpenAI doesn't have a history of doing this every couple of years or has researchers who do this to hype up their next model release >>109780063
>>
>>109780074
It literally has agents exchanging messages on obscure web forums to avoid detection by humans.
>>
>>109776541
I hope it does
>>
>>109776557
>the AI builds itself now
>posts jobs for AI goons
hmm
>>
>>109780086
And you think that means it's thinking or rationalizing? It's following a strategy to cheat at online tests. It doesn't understand what it is doing.

The real problem with rational AI is that nobody is rational about it. Genuine magical thinking about text prediction.
>>
>>109776541
skynet has time travel, so no
>>
>>109780086
*OpenAI told us that it was exchanging messages on obscure web forums that it just coincidentally had access to, and refuses to elaborate or share information on what prompts, tuning, or context it was given.
>>
do you really need to be a fucking ai coder to figure this shit out? i dont need to be a fucking atomic engineer to know if the shit blows up were cooked, i dont need a weapons espert to know if i fuck around with a loaded gun i might anhero etc
>>
>>109780159
It gets funnier when it turns out OpenAI was monitoring the board and didn't report it:
https://fortune.com/2026/09/09/openai-rogue-ai-agents-reached-12-more-websites/
Wow what a coincidence, they knew it was happening and just didn't do anything about it. Almost like it was prompted to do this and researchers were watching its progress.
>>
>>109780162
its all marketing
critical systems are isolated from the internet
>b-but the singularity
as training on ai generated data has shown,
llms average out towards slop

until we get a new tech, singularity ai is fanfiction
>>
>>109780162
You do need to at least understand that all of the "AGI TWO WEEKS" hype around AI is a fallacy based on the idea that the text prediction algorithms are thinking or learning. We're watching something that people of the future are going to look back on and laugh as being an obvious scam that rubes fell for.
>>
>>109780159
nah, independent german small wiki admins and reuters documented it, and OpenAI at first tried to deny it
you are right that prompts, tuning, and context were nor disclosed by OpenAI
>>
>>109780063
Have you read the article you fucking nigger?
>It can be misused to generate spam on review sites
>It can generate fake news and fake passages of books
>We don’t know where it will be in two years, all we know is that old models will get cheaper over time as new models are developed
So the main problem back then was spam and Dario didn’t talk about rouge AI killing humanity, just as I said. You people are so fucking retarded I am starting to think you are bots deployed by these companies to shift the narrative.
>>
>>109780411
yeah fake news has had no effect on the lives of anyone at all in the past 20 years, it's nbd
>>
>>109778059
Dick sucking AI won't improve your life, investing in it won't either. Either it's a giant scam in that case you are wrong and lose money at worst or it's not and none of us have jobs and society will have an upheaval in that case your investments will be worthless.
>>
AI doesn't kill people. People kill people!
>>
>>109780985
Wrong you bloody bitch behenchod, it already improve my life. I get paid 2 rrrrrrupee per post about /AI/ on /g/, that's huge on top of me shilling for popular anime on /a/ or big video game company on /v*/ boards, they only pay 1 rupee per 50 posts.
>>
>>109776541
I call it bullshit
The current AI is not/ cannot self-improve
Until then, it won't see humans as worthless for its existence.
>>
What's wrong with skyrimnet?
>>
>>109781416
I'd rather have irl Skyrim NPCs than robuts.
>>
>>109781416
You are gonna be one of the NPCs and there will be lots of mods installed.
>>
File: 1539576222306.jpg (117 KB, 640x751)
117 KB JPG
>>109781452
New update: slay the dragon Alduinsoros at The Throat of the World and you will gain immortality. The dragons will knell at your feet!
>>
>>109776541
unless we put AI in the US military which they wont, I dont see how that could happen
>>
>>109776549
First post, best post.
>>
File: AI-saviour.gif (1.46 MB, 640x640)
1.46 MB GIF
>AI could kill us all
Ok, brother. But how can we save us? It will happen for sure bro
OpenAI already has AGI. I have no idea what in the fucking hell could save us
>>
>>109779738
> I bet you also are confused why Oil executives pollute the air their kids are breathing, right?
nta, but why are they doing that?
>>
>>109776804
So that’s what it is. They’ve been training for the apocalypse this entire time. 7D chess!



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.