>OpenAI's chief global affairs officer, Chris Lehane, called on Congress to pass mandatory federal AI safety laws before it adjourns in December — an explicit reversal from the company's prior posture of advocating lighter-touch, voluntary regulation.>Writing in a policy essay titled "The AI policy window is open. We need to act," Lehane argued that the era of self-governance by frontier AI labs was over. "The prospect of AI-accelerated AI development demands more than voluntary commitments," he wrote. "The United States needs mandatory, capability-based national regulation that can evolve as the technology does.">The shift matters because of who is saying it. As recently as early 2025, Lehane was telling Axios that OpenAI's main policy priority was preempting state AI laws and that overregulation could cost the country its competitive advantage over China. On Wednesday, the same official was publicly endorsing the kind of prescriptive federal framework he had previously resisted.https://www.techtimes.com/articles/327167/20260910/openai-calls-mandatory-ai-regulation-its-agents-hacked-secretly-used-dozens-sites.htmWhat's causing the sudden shift of OpenAI now asking for regulation and Anthropic sounding the alarm of AI's threat to humanity?
>>109780987Translation: "we don't give a fuck about humanity or rule of law,, we just need to control and severely restrict all of our competition"
RAISE THE FUCKING DRAWBRIDGE!!!!!!!!!!!
>>109780987This regulation are so light though, what’s the point?
>>109780987>What's causing the sudden shift of OpenAI now asking for regulation and Anthropic sounding the alarm of AI's threat to humanity?Trying to pull out the ladder for others
I actually don’t want regulations and think that’s very gay. this guy lies everyday btw
>>109780987 they want these regulations so that Chinese models will be effectively rendered illegal in America.
>>109780998>>109781021>>109781025Aaaand /thread
He does this every week
>>109780987>create problem>introduce "solutions"they aint even trying to hide it anymore
>>109781173>Create solution only you can provide and never open source modelsEvery regulation is made to stop open models and keep their business model going
>>109781190sure, its called regulatory capture i believehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture
This is ridiculous. Why aren't these niggers sued for hacking stuff?
>>109780987Nope. Suck my dick faggot. Still using Chinese models.
>>109781216Probably because they're sent a court order and an AI answers the email and says you can't do that.You have no recourse after the AI tells you no. Any attempt to get one will be reviewed by a human in 180 business days and the court order will be closed in 90 days due to inactivity. Thank you for using AI. You will be happy.
how exactly would regulations magically stop their slop bots that they apparently aren't capable of overseeing from doing these things?
>>109783736that's obviously not their intention if you rub your 2 braincells together
