[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


I need ADSB geniuses to explain why Zig is clearly better. Zig is a poised language with aids but good for radio applications.
>>
Guys come on.
>>
>>109785803
Zig is unstable and has over-verbose syntax. Furthermore it doesn't have that many new/useful features except first-class comptime.

However, the devs are the only competent language devs among nuLang devs. The language is going in largely the right direction, the only problem is the dev's poor syntactic taste overall (could be worse, could be seed7). The language is fast and keeps you in control, while having facilities that make typical error classes far rarer and without the usual overhead that has been standard in the past decades when languages reached for this kind of compromise.

Furthermore, zig is the only nuLang that's vehemently anti-AI, which ensures that going forward, it is the only language that will be worth using, if any of the new crop of languages is worth using.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.