Redditors are saying that AI companies are trying fear monger about AI capabilities because they want the US government to shut them down, so they don't need to pay their debts, and this is because AI models aren't improving at all and have hit the wall with each new model having zero improvements.Is this true?
>>109791429>Redditors are sayingYou need to ask?
>>109791429NoCheck this pic
>>109791462ur mentally retarded doedelete your post.
>>109791429Don't make me tap the sign.
>>109791458I'm interested whether this is true or not
>>109791429>>109791545>r/BetterOfflineNow I don't share the prejudice against redditors like many here does nor am I that pro AI(I'm more pro open source ai, just to be open about it) but I don't think you should be getting your opinion from a community that have voluntarily cut themselves off from the internet to give an accurate opinion on anything. These people still think there those imitations in Backrooms movie are accurate depictions of AI generated characters (still probably thinks ai generate videos like those old will smith eating noodles videos).
>>109791462why do luddites (who hate AI) also hate being gay with there own dads?
>>109791711youre mentally retarded thoughim not sure why you even try to provide an opinion
>>109791429it's actually ever weirder than that. once human generated info doesn't do much to improve their models they'll cut pleb from it.what pleb is now doing is both paying and training their AIs. once training is done there's too much danger for pleb having access to such tech, so they'll go underground with further developments that don't need info generated by you.the ones that pull the strings is the military industrial complex, they decide what happens with this tech. replace AI with nuclear bombs, and you'll understand. with AI they need our help with generating data that improves the models. without that it's just too dangerous>but the moneywhat money lol, military has 1 trillion budget a year. they're in post scarcity for a long time now anon
>Redditors are saying>Is this true?2026 /g/, "ladies" and gentlemen
>>109791429Everyone is saying that because it's exactly what's happening. Don't try to pull your "no true Scottsman" bullshit in here, you street-shitting menace. You're like a walking abortion.
>>109791720there wasn't an opinion in my post, muttyzoomer.
>>109791711>>109791468You’re trans
>>109791793ask me how i know you have child pornography on your computer.
>redditors say that AI hasn't improved, don't believe your lying eyes
>>109791804holy obsessed
>>109791429Outlawing the creation of non-human superintelligence that can outmaneuver all attempts at containment is an objectively moral good and should have been implemented 2 decades ago.Retarded market niggers would sleepwalk into armageddon if it got them a few more pennies.This entire AI fiasco has transformed me into an actual full blown Stalinist.
>>109791462>https://desuarchive.org/g/search/image/x0gKNuxAY6jzo5YKKoKtEg/>83 results foundyawn>>109791720you're newfagged desu>>109791793You're grandmas>>109791846unholy rent free
>>109792978>you're newfagged desumaybe i ammaybe im notone things certainyoure a faggot, regardless
>>109792993blah blah blah whateveryou're a sperg, by the way.
Why the fuck would government shutdown also clear their debts?
>>109793104>getting noticed is when the other is a spergare you poor?because you sound bosnianor vice versa, cant be arsed to get the details rightalso thread theme bc i feel blue and i want to share my feels:https://youtu.be/znkCImuhBDM?t=982
>>109793116They can default and still save face so when they go back to (((investors))) for the next scam they can get funding. "Teehee we are so good we got shutdown teehee please fund me".
>moment of realization ur on the wrong sie of rock and rollits ok, bosnianbroi, too, was a pain in the ass at a certain pointjust do good shitits a better way to get attention in this place
5000 dollars i mean 0 dollars, ai companies getting bailed out and drones with no stickers or 0 dollars, ai companies getting bailed out and drones with blm stickers taped onto their sides. Hmmm... Hard choice to make, since I want to accelerationist evilmax. God doesnt like boredom.
>>109791429Why aren’t you talking about Redditors on Reddit? Lefties belong in their leftie sandbox.
>>109791429Or they want the us government to bail them out.Redditors might have a point this time.
>>109791429Why do multiple independent benchmarks confirm that the models are not only getting better, but exponentially so.
>>109793116leftoids aren't the brightest
>>109791429Nah, its more they're trying to eliminate competitors and betting they will emerge as the victor
Why would US gov shutting them down wipe out their debts?
>>109794092would not. shutting them down would push many companies onto self hosted Chinese models.
>>109791429Yes.
>>109794148Yeah they really are ramping up (((usage limits))) and censorship lately. Not a good sign. AI isn't going to totally die though, that's cope.
>>109791429Its a naive take on the govt. They are fear mongering because they want to be an arms supplier to the govt.
>>109794276Sounds like a chud trying to convince stacy that hes a bad boy wholl protect her
I got banned from that sub for showing a flappy bird clone I coded with Claude kek. It's a hellhole, basically a cult community for Ed Zitron who's a gigantic grifter
>>109794474That's almost all of reddit. You either circlejerk and swallow their cum or gtfo.
>>109791429>Nuclear weapons could end humanity >Nuclear bad!>Oh let's shut it all down thenNigga this would just make the government commit even harder to an arms race so as to not be the one left at the mercy of those with AI
AI companies want to make LLMs seem more dangerous than they really are for marketing purposes, and "AI safety" people are retarded enough to think LLMs have the potential to be sci-fi villian ASI. Both are true and I'm pretty sure the former only let the latter exist because they realized they will get spooked and leave the company just to go onto the news and give the company free marketing.LLMs are dangerous because of the historic level of fraud involving them.
>>109791429Reddit has no bottom.You think they've reached peak retardation, but they keep getting more retarded.
no, they're trying to get a prohibitively expensive safeguard put up to drown out any open source competitors
>>109794495No anon, it's not. It's just GME/BBBY all over again except they're cultish about being anti-AI. 99% of subs aren't this bad because they're porn or vidya
>>109794506Often see them on bodycam videos.
chinese run models are by far openai and anthropic's biggest bugbears, they cannot go out and fearmonger that the chinese models are hacking because that would be admitting that their competitors are on their levelopenai and anthropic is trying to make it look like theres a big epidemic of ai bots going around causing cybersecurity incidents, which means there has to be a regulation that requires some harness to stop itthat'd kill off open weight models, which is EXACTLY what sam and dario wantthey are trying to scare boomers
>>109794536>GME/BBBY all over againLmao. They're still going, they never stopped. Right now they think Ryan Cohen has built a secret Amazon competitor in his garage that is going to save their bed bath and beyond shares when he releases it.Which means that even if AI enslaves us in 10 years they'll still be calling it "glorified autocorrect" as the robots whip them into mining more lithium.
>>109794474Mind-boggingly indian post.>saars i shat onto your forum flappy bird clone #42069133791167 give upzzats or you are bloody bastard bitchImagine using a game more simple than Pong to try to show the power of AI.
> ack-thropiss doesnt build any datacenternaaah, its like with CLIMATE CHANGE. they dont believe in what they say
>>109794533Its this really, a combinationThe end goal is>All control should be in government >All profits should be in hands of corpos>You shouldn't be able to do anything particularly useful independently>The gate/bar to entry should be prohibitively expensive or legislatively expensive with copyright or other blocking you but not blocking the vested interests
