The UK Government has announce that phones will need to "It must be impossible for anyone under the age of 18 to take, view or send nude images. This means images must be blocked across all device features, including the camera and third-party apps."I can't see how they can do this without having it at the OS level that phones automatically block images of naked people unless ID (probably through a Google or Apple account) is provided and that would surely impact all phones unless the UK was to get its own personal updates.
Apple already has this with ’sensitive content warning’ they are halfway there
>>109802284This level of antisemitism shall not be tolerated.
next it will be anyone under 18 must not make phone calls, all people wishing to make phone calls must verify their identity and age.
>>109802349honestly, i get that you westoids are all born in countries where your greatest achievement is being "white", but as a poor fag 3rd worlder that always used cheap ass android phones from China with 5 years old Andorid versions, I must say that 3rd worlders are eatting good. Even if there if there are some laws or some shit from the UK, it will reach my place by the year 2035 - by then the UK should cease to exist.
We need a new internet. What do we call it?
>>109802284>have to take nude picture for doctor>need to provide government ID linked to the picturethat is awkward
>>109802386Shows how brown you are that you didn’t just think to go into settings and turn off updates after the effective date.
>>109802391>>109802284>Can't take nudes unless an ID is in frame>sluts get doxxed
>>109802398updates? on a 10 years old android phone? I do not need to do that my friend :D
>>109802391They are just making it so you have there will be at least one thing you want to do with your phone that will require ID rather than looking like they are just forcing everyone to use it... they are smarter than us, even if it doesnt seem like it.
What should we do about all those cameras that are not part of a cell phone?
Based. Next they should block camera access entirely and solve 90% of society’s problems
>>109802389>internet"The only way for any user to take, view..." Even taking a picture offline would apparently be illegal without ID which is why I believe it would need to be done at the OS level which would impact all mobile phones.
The UK is gonna accidentally force FAGMANN to invent domain-specific machines, when they eventually require the camera to be a separate module you need a loicense for.
>>109802402the phone wont last much longer anyways because 4g is shutting down for 5g only.
>>109802438it would be difficult since google doesn't do that for any country now and expensive
that is haram. have to prohibit gambling and music too. fully support, no god but Allah.
>>109802284Preparing for WWIII to censor frontline footage or because of protests against immigration which just happened before this was announced
>>109802389what you need is a new government jfc>>109802408*more insidious if they were smart, they'd realize where this all ends
>>109802485>prohibit gamblingexcept camel races brother, mashala
>>109802284on the face of it that's pretty fucking based
>>109802284How accurate are the AI nudity detectors though? Even if it's 99.9%, there's still a possibility for kids to see nude images, which is not "impossible". Obviously another issue is that such detector would have to work with all websites and apps, even with videos too. I wonder if ASCII-art nudes count? What if you use drawing app to draw a penis?
>>109802547The only possible issue is if it gave a false positive for illegal porn which would then be tied to your ID
>>109802284Parents should ABSOLUTELY have to take active steps.It's your own fucking kid. You wanted it, you shat it out, now you take care of it. How you're gonna prevent it from knowing what a pussy looks like until 18 is your own fucking problem, not anyone elses.
>>109802373but first you must watch this ad
>>109802605parents kill their children anon, go missing, get drunk, don't ggive a fuck. people who are doing this absolutely know what parents do and don't do. you can play pretend and put it on them and literally nothing will change. they literally couldn't give a flying fuck about controlling their kids phones. even if you know quite a few parents that do, most of them don't, because most of them aren't in your close circle of friends that live in some medium income cozy setup. they're piss poor and literally barely survive. setting things on their kids phones is like the 100th thing as prioriity in their lives.practically it's not feasible. most humans are pieces of shit or barely survive to expect ANOTHER thing from them, on top of everything else going on
>>109802605it also means the government is taking control of children instead of parents
>>109802638Sucks for their kids. Not my problem.
>>109802389Meshnet, but you're going to have to make some friends
>>109802605Parents are irresponsible shits, especially Australians who actively support this crap due to reactionary bullshit
>>109802284No, it will work exactly as intended. The phone will take the picture and send it to a datacenter in India for them to review. If the photo in question is of someone underage, they will press the red button which will prevent the photo from writing to storage, but will send it instead to Tel Aviv for their archival purposes.It will all be in the EULA, and you will click "I accept".
>>109802284This is totally not working both in favor of big corporations and 1984 level gubmints lol
>>109802605the government is an extension of the family/parents.
The UK will always be a grumpy old men country, most of the bad stigma Western Europe gets is 90% because of the UK and their retarded bureaucracy.Its wild how different they and a country like france is for instance regarding stuff like tech sovereignty and being self sufficient but ig its just in their nature and history
Every breath you takewww.inverse.com/article/16929-apple-watch-will-now-remind-ou-to-breatheEvery move you makewww.stopspying.org/latest-news/2021/10/1/stop-condemns-apple-for-tracking-iphone-location-when-turned-offEvery bond you breakacecilia.medium.com/apple-is-sending-a-request-to-their-servers-for-every-piece-of-software-you-run-on-your-mac-b0bb509eee65Every step you takewww.komando.com/security-privacy/secret-map-tracking-apple/465598I'll be watching youarchive.is/2024.10.10-000653/https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2024/10/09/apple-sells-privacy-to-consumers-but-its-quietly-helping-police-use-iphones-for-surveillanceEvery single dayhttps://sneak.berlin/20230115/macos-scans-your-local-files-nowEvery word you saywww.foxbusiness.com/technology/apples-siri-is-eavesdropping-on-your-conversations-putting-users-at-riskEvery game you playtechstory.in/apple-slammed-by-epic-games-chief-for-spyware-toolsEvery night you staywww.thehackernews.com/2017/10/iphone-camera-spying.htmlI'll be watching youwww.malwarebytes.com/blog/news/2022/11/apple-sued-for-pervasive-and-unlawful-data-trackingOh, cant you seeYou belong to metruthout.org/articles/apple-employee-blows-whistle-on-illegal-spying-and-toxic-working-conditionsHow my poor heart achesWith every step you takenakedsecurity.sophos.com/2018/08/13/siri-is-listening-to-you-but-shes-not-spying-says-appleEvery move you makegizmodo.com/apple-iphone-ipad-privacy-problems-data-gatheringEvery vow you breakappleinsider.com/articles/16/09/29/apple-acknowledges-tracking-imessage-metadata-and-sharing-it-with-law-enforcementEvry smile you fakeabc4.com/news/tech-social-media/yes-your-iphone-is-taking-invisible-pictures-of-youEvery claim you stakewonderfulengineering.com/u-s-apple-store-employees-are-working-to-unionize-and-theyre-using-android-phones-to-keep-apple-from-spying-on-themI'll be watching youhttps://sneak.berlin/20201112/your-computer-isnt-yours
>>109802284just geo block UK at this point and isolate them from everyone with a huge sea wallproblem solved
>>109802386boiling frog room temperature IQ 3rd world nigger
>>109802386>by then the UK should cease to exist.stop nooticing goy
>>109802284Age of consent is 16 in the UK. You're allowed to have sex, but you can't send nudes? They aren't even trying to hide it.
>>1098024545g has a range of less than a kilometer, this would devastate cellular internet coverage if it were enacted
>>109802284I really need to stop stalling and lineage my own device soon. I'm not looking forward to figuring out what new email service to forward everything to, Proton's nice but I can foresee them going with the coming ID-verification bullshit that's just around the cornerI really don't want to deal with the headache of self-hosting my email. I doubt they'll let the plebs do that and have access to the greater network anyhow
>>109803688>Age of consent is 16 in the UK. You're allowed to have sex, but you can't send nudes?New enforcement mechanisms aside, this or something close has been the law in much of the west for decades now.
man I can't imagine having to deal with this as a teen considering how easy and prevalent trading nudes was on msn messenger 25 years ago
It's unworkable anyway.It was dreamt up by Jess Phillips and was being used to cover for their transphobia and digital ID which was to still go ahead at the time.Now, Phillips resigned, to try to get Starmer out, but Starmer then pushed it, before sadly accepting his fate like the miserable sack of bones he is.Now, from that point on, it should be dead in the water like digital ID (which was unfunded) but it's sticking around because Burnham is Labour's first female leader & PM or some weird shit like that. Burnham's big still on that campaign of protecting women and girls, and they still need good press because of the transphobia and going after autists. Now you'd think, since it's unworkable, they'd just shut up but no. They need it to deflect, and also they believe that reform voters care about it because they're always talking about grooming gangs.You see, centrists in Labour are obsessed with the idea and concept of appearing reasonable. People are against diddling kids or anything affiliated with it so it's easy. You give an unworkable ultimatum to tech companies to cover your flaws like you're some shite lyric from a 1988 alt rock album and then that's it sorted.It doesn't matter if it takes CPU cycles. If it's incompatible with older devices. you can try applying it to new devices. But phones also aren't the only piece of technology. Really, what you need to understand is that this only exists because Wes Streeting put Jess Phillips up to resign and she wanted something unhinged to go in her 2 pages of A4.Don't give it the headspace you think it demands desu. It's just neoliberal centrist nonsense.
Obviously this is a backdoor to requiring ai be allowed to snoop on everyone's devices by default in real time forever just in case the not an adult checkbox is marked and it needs to censor it.Otherwise even the built in camera won't even work.Always online, always a data connection, always being monitored required by law or even offline features are disabled.
>>109802386These laws will never arrive in my third world country. If anything, there's no laws here.
>Parents and caretakers shouldn't have to be responsible for what kids are doing on the internet
>>109804073False, you will be using devices designed for much more profitable markets where it is required so the default software will be analyzing your photos even with no laws requiring it.
>>109802284Interesting, time to buy some Nikon and Canon stock. Not Sony though because fuck Sony forever.
>>109802874Trvke
>>109803688>Age of consent is when mohammed feels like it in the UK
>>109802284You’re just mad you won’t be able to send pictures of your shrimp dick to children
>>109802454in the yuuukay they're going to keep 2G on indefinitely because of 3 gorillion smart meters and old people emergency devices. So even ancient phones will still keep working
>>109802389whatever it is, it should have the word "nigger" in the name to keep normalfags out
in the 2030s your CoPilot or Apple Intelligence powered 8GB laptop will in real time scan your activity and instantly cool you out when you're about to do something naughty without handing over your identity informationLinux will be either regulated or banned as incompliant
>>109802284I will never forget the first time I saw an image of a naked woman.It screwed me up so much, so badly. Since then, I murder and rape 5 million women per week. Every week. Because of the porn. We MUST protect under 18 years old people from seeing this. And if that means we have to turn every computer into a mandatory spying machine, that is a price that we must be willing to pay. To save the children from becoming like me.
>>109802284This is kind of weird if you think about it, because it means apparently it's ok for someone who is 13 to watch titanic on their smartphone, APART FROM the bit where leo is drawing his under 25 gf.
Yet fuck all happens when an annoying frog with a tiny dick pops up on the TV screen.
>>109802547typical hackers' diseasestop guessing how effective a bad law will be, fight that it becomes law in the first placegov'ts never take back bad laws ever
>>109802284Why are we depriving horny teenagers of gooning? Even the most puritanical era allowed scraps for them here and there
>>109802284why don't the UK just put everyone under 18 in prison instead and just let them out when they turn 18, it would be very safe!
>>109802284As a father of two daughters, this is unironically awesome. About time our government did something right.
>>109805171What
>>109805933letting children use smartphones is gross neglect
>>109802284the endgame is to only view pre-approved content (hash sum whitelist) and constantly verify your identity with multiple biometric scans on each device
>>109802284Why is the UK government pretending to care? they didn't care when children were being raped by muslim gangs (the police intentionally ignored it)
>>109806387because this is a great fig leaf to introduce constant government monitoring of all devices
>>109802284>this just in: streaking burglars were unable to be captured on cameras and got away with another museum heist
just got my running license
>>109806472manuel of course
>>109802386>I must say that 3rd worlders are eatting good.I'm sure the tapeworms and other parasites inside them are "eating good" too.
>>109802284There could be a second embedded computer that acts as a bridge/firewall between the camera and the phone's main CPU. Suppose this second processor has AI image recognition capabilities - at the least intrusive level, it could simply prevent the image/video from being sent to the main CPU. At worst, it could also have access to the baseband processor and act as a backdoor. Imagine something similar to the Intel Management Engine.This would only apply to future devices though. >>109802605anyone who doesn't know what a pussy looks like before 18 has been sheltered to the point of neglect
>>109802284wow, they really don't want teenagers gooning online, don't they? they want them getting impregnated by immigrant BBC at school instead
are Android users in the UK going to get forced age-verification? i've been looking this shit up for the last 20 minutes and can't find out exactly what the fuck is going to happen to my Android.
>>109806702latest phones already have baked in onboard AI in them that analyzes photos and most likely sends the results to google and apple
>>109806734this is very different from what I asked. the onboard AI is actually useful btw. it's not a privacy-breaking device in itself.t. used it to build an AI app
>buy a film camera>take picture of my dong>develop it at home>mail them to the school Realistically speaking how can the government stop this?
>>109802284They are going to both ID your phone and have all your images go through a clanker then
>>109806750well they're just probably going to extend it to simply blacking out nudes
>>109802284so I guess topless is fine if she's wearing pantsand vice versaprobably needs a few more drafts
>>109802526>they'd realize where this all endsYou wont do shit
>>109802284>encodes porn in sun raster, streams to a fujitsu slide projector through midinothin personnel
>>109802284They want on-device censorship to stop people sharing photos and videos of anything that might make people think twice about mass immigration.
>>109806702Yes it's mentioned by both apple and google
This would kill phone performance to have a constant AI censoring app
what they really want is their software on every computer and this is a nice excusei do wonder why people can't see the downsides of this simply because they wrapped it in teen nudity prevention
Will the UK ban GrapheneOS and PostmarketOS as enabling "pedo phones" or will they bend the knee?
>>109807922google is doing a good enough job by slowly strangling AOSP to death
>>109807484I doubt thats high on `priority concerns` list anon
>>1098036364chan is rather going down fighting instead of just blocking the UK. Imgur already gave up too easily, and that is ironic since they were supposed to be the "non enshittified image service" originally back in when it was created for redditors.
>>109807964Meh, fuck bongs, they're a pajeet colony anyway
>>109802605>Parents should ABSOLUTELY have to take active steps
>>109803562very interesting>0 repliesis this entire website botted?
>>109802284This is what happens when Snowden gets memory holed. The glowies had exceptional success in their smear campaign against him; retards will throw lose all semblance of rationality if you tell them someone is a Russian asset, even if there is no proof.
>>109802284It sounds as if the real reason isthey want to create a situation here where you have to ID to use the phone?I'm thinking in the direction of mandatory unlock the phone with fingerprint or facerecognition.Think about it, if the phone would unlock over 18 content because the owner is an adult, then the children would just use the phone of the parent.So what they really want is to implement a forced "you have to ID to use the phone"mechanic. And in my opinion they shit on childrens rights, or harm prevention or whatever! What they want is, they want to be able to interfere with certain persons using devices. ID the phone user, and then act according to who is using the device. (interfere with their posting, reading of news, ..., whatever)An example for the need for such methods at the surveillance side:With a phone that doesn't ID you, one could make cryptopayments (send,receive). And it could be hard to trace this.In contrast with a phone that identifies you ...
>>109803562Awesome post! you probably know (TV, "saving your words".)https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/2097490173953012033>"Researchers spent 500 hours and $70,000 >and found LG TVs logging plain text transcripts in standby,
>>109806387and that does give you a little hint if it is about saving children - OR if it is about something else! ... Remember the father who wanted to free his abused daughter and was intimidated by (rogue?) police?
>>109806387>Why does the Government/Establishment do things that are in their interest and don't do things that aren'tThey literally let your children get raped. Why would they ever throw you a bone?
>>109808172It's a copypasta. Most of us have seen it already, I assume.This thread is also full of low effort stuff so it gets lost in a sea of crap.
>>109802530Camel races are allowed to have prizes for the winners, not for those betting, gambling is prohibited.
Disable camera Disable imagesText only phoneDone
>>109802373kek, who uses their phone to make calls?
What if the under 18 person wants to look at porn and their parents are okay with it though?
Who gives a shit about the UK?
>>109802284>More 1984 than Chinavery impressive, gweilo
>>109802389>>109804515we call it the nigger-net, obviously
>>109802386>By then the UK should cease to existAnon, whitey is still going to be here as your personal boogeyman until the heat death of the universe. You shouldn't expect nature to take care of your problems. Besides, if the UK really did disappear by 2035 we'd be halfway to the death of human civilization. It would leave only America as the last surviving bastion of world-building Anglos and we already have 100 million shitskins here trying to make certain that humanity never aspires to anything again.
>>109802373People under 18 shouldn't have a phone to begin with.
>>109811682Only people under 18 should have a phone. If you're over that age, you should be working in a factory - not staring at a screen.
Stallman was right about literally everything, including his antinatalism. Parents especially single mothers applaud having everyone's rights taken away if it means they can continue to neglect their spawn.
>>109802386being born white is the greatest achievement that anyone will probably ever have on this planet for all of history
classic britain
>>109802284what i dont understand is if cp taking by kids and grooming is so rampant they need to be asking for id on phones then surerly it shouldnt be illegal because it implies society deems it okay
>>109802284They just want utter tyranny and 0 free White people
>>109802284It'll never happen, because they'd have to stop the Muslim rape gangs from taking pictures of their underage victims and the UK government at all levels protects Muslims from legal consequences.
>>109802373scam calls disappear overnight
>>109802284UK is retarded. There's no other conclusion. What difference does it even make to be on a device or not? You can see it in real life. I knew they had issues but this year has shown how retarded they really are.
>>109813607Buddy, you're naive. This isn't retardation, it's malice. The government wants total information awareness and compliance.
>>109813556they will never allow us to have what they have
>>109802284>Any device with a camera must spend 25% of the energy budget or a minimum of 5 watts to perform computation for the identification of nudity on all current and future images.
>>109805933I would like to add your daughters to my harem and under British Sharia law you're not allowed to say no
>>109813624I still say it's retarded in the grand scheme of things because they might get information and compliance temporarily until they get kicked out and they're already walking on eggs. They're not every good evil doers. If they wanted to do this effectively they wouldn't do it so bluntly.
>>109802284The UK social media ban for under18s will require digital id verification for *everyone*, which may soon extend to having the digital ID in OS level phone updates
>>109802284A clever way to introduce AI analyzing every photo even as they're being taken. First you build and perfect the system against nude images on phones used by kids (same models used by adults) and after that all it takes is one toggle and a different training dataset to filter any other content on everyone's phones.
>>109813659>which may soon extend to having the digital ID in OS level phone updatesthey already have this in ios unsure about android
>>109813689It's not clever because they're declaring it to everyone and a lot of people know that's the goal. They're exposing themselves. Clever is what California is doing with the OS age check. Start small, expand, and now you can have the mass surveillance. This is easily breakable so the complaint ones will be spied and the criminals better hidden.
>>109807964Imgur's fate was sealed the moment they started censoring nsfw. You used to be able to view galleries of pictures from specific subreddits that were hosted on imgur. A few years back they disabled that for nsfw subreddits. I quit using it after that because the userbase makes reddit look like a republican party convention. I checked it now and it seems the system is gone for all subreddits and switches to their tag system.
Why don't they just stop putting cameras on phones? Make a cheaper teen-friendly model without a camera.
>>109813739That's antisemitic, you're going to jail
>>109806387>Why is the UK government pretending to care?The kid tries to take a nude and Apple flags the pic immediately due to safety laws and sends it straight to the PM's officeEndless underage nudes for the political class!
>>109813739Same reason they will never promote the old analogue way of life ever again.
>>109803688Age of consent only applies to adults, you can always have sex with people your own age.
>>109813978>only applies to adults
>>109802389web2
>>109802605why dont adults understand that kids wanting to know what a pussy or a dick looks like is natural. Puberty kicks in way before 18I knew what a pussy looked like at 11 because i looked it up, no phone, no internet, i just stayed up late and watched television
>>109802605What did humanity do before control freaks micromanaged their lives?
>>109802389Alternet would be nice if it wasn't taken.
>>109814566Fucked and sucked and shat our children they didn't want to raise who then grew up to be deranged adults who repeated the process until we ended up in the hellscape we live in now. The censorship push has nothing to do with protecting children, that is just a pretence for the panopticon rollout
