>tfw fedora 45 release date is less than 1 month away
i look like this
I don't know why they only support a release for 9 months.
>his OS releasesngmi
>little cartoon girlngmi
>>109835195Yeah my OS releases, just like I release on you're moms face.
>>109835218cartoon website
>>109834930ok, how does this affect me (an archlinux user *btw*)?
>>109834992like a jpg?>>109835230i'm pretty sure the website is actually html+php+javascript, maybe a bit of css., not a cartoon.retard.
>>109835513retard website
>>109834930seggs and nagasaki with shamiko
I can't say I haven't been enjoying my time using fedora but I haven't used any benefit of btrfs literally ever. Also, the fact that red hat removed btrfs from RHEL long ago makes me wonder if they trust this filesystem.
Yeah, just upgraded to 44. Pretty comfy.
Are they finally switching to kmscon?>>109834930
>>109835132POst the changeset at leasthttps://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/45/ChangeSet>>109835132Every release gets 13 month support because the focus of Fedora is innovation.https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/releases/lifecycle/Use your internet to search for answers>>109835503You Archfags only followw trends established by Fedora. Arch itself is a niche x86 only distro that offloads labor to its users then complains when it affects its reputation.>>109836677They do not trust it on enterprise production ready environments, this is why being developed in Fedora. Once it matures enough to beat LVM+XFS it will get implemented in RHEL.>>109837651They arehttps://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/45/ChangeSet#Use_kmscon_as_default_VT_console
>>109838890>Arch itself is a niche x86 only distro that offloads labor to its users then complains when it affects its reputation.They never do that
>>109838890Wow 13 months not 9... that's a whole 4 more months.I guess if you want an LTS version supported for 5-15 years like UBONGO LTS you gotta get RHEL.
>>109834930>dnf update>eyy chuddy not enough space on /boot>read about the issue>it’s so unreliable to resize the volune using live usb that fedora recommends reinstalling the whole os (!!) if you originally set up fedora 42 or earlier
>>109834930I love fedora. I switched to it like 2 years ago, but now I already feel pressure by the fast release cycle.The upgrade feature worked mostly, but I always have the feeling that my system is fully bloated afterwards. So I want to reinstall, but reinstalling is always a hassle, because I have no scripted method of setting up my software. The data is no problem
I always updoot right away but don't care about most of the changes or get excited about new releases. Especially because I'm on GNOME which doesn't change much anymore every release has been extremely boring for me, which is a good thing. Maybe some system component will be 10% faster. The OS should be boring. I used to think I'd be happier on Debian but since Fedora hasn't ever broken on me I don't see any reason to go for that route.
>>109834930>no audacity 4 in fedora repos>nothing in flathub eitherCum on jannies, its been two weeks. i dont wanna use a shitty appimage
>>109834930>fixed arbitrary release datebeta test distro
>>109835636not cool [the website]a prisonGET ME OUT OF HERE
