Give me one good reason why nothing looks like this anymore.
looks like it belongs in a museum because it doeshttps://cari.institute/aesthetics/vectorheart
>>109874058Web shitters are all indians without talent or imagination because they grew up in India. Have you ever met a cool or creative indian? Neither have I.
>>109874058I remember this style of webdesign pretty well because that's when I was still into design. That font is deeply etched into my memory. Tons of tutorials on how to create that style. Back then a lot of programmers didn't like designs like this>too slow to load >uses tables (and sometimes frames) and not div and css>and not even W3C validated xHTML!zengarden became pretty popular and everyone was marveling that you could have one html document but thousands of different designs and that lead from the old way of design (slicing designs and putting them into tables; often with iframes) towards xhtml and css.Only noobs used frames anymore. This led to a change in designs.The last designs I did was when web 2.0 started. The listapart (a very popular website for web designers back then) style was pretty common. But as you can see, there was still some header (often a photo you took) but otherwise very basic designYou can still look up some old tutorials on internet archive, start up photoshop 6 and start designing
>>109874058because by its nature it was a transitory style bridging the end of skeuomorphic design and the minimalist styles
>>109874058Websites are seen as bloat by advertisers and just want them to get to the point. Same reason why logos are simplistic.
>>109874058Jews.
>>109874058Because it's unreadable, noisy dogshit. Also because you're not doing anything about it yourself.
>>109874670this, the "noise" detracts from the ads
>>109874058Survival of the fittest. If this got more traffic, it would have come out on top.
>>109874058Mobile unironically killed web design. Only the left third of the page would be usable on a phone, the rest of the design would be wasted. From that point, the race to the bottom for "usability" (aka cheapness) finished the job.
>>109874058the "web" died and now we just have the aids ridden internet designed for phones that's whypeople used to have dreams of what tech either could be or already was, now they just have nightmaresthat era of the net is never coming back
>>109874090the flatshit trend came from the US and so did React + angular
>>109874090i think one of the guitarists from sum 41 was indian but based on his wikipedia page he was not cool at all
>>109874670I thought people wanted simple websites? That's all I've ever heard from this board in the past. Anon's always talk about modern sites being bloat and if a website gets too fancy they go>le web design is my passion!!mocking the creator.
>>109880236>I thought people wanted simple websites?Retards aren't people.
Rate the artwork I did on my Casio Classpad 300 in 2005
>>109882629
>>109882638
>>109874292Sauce me more knowledgeable anon.I want to make a website for my business, that has somewhat retro style layout but not looking like a try hard.
>>109874058Just put the text of my hypertext document on my fooking screen webmonkey. I do not care about skateboard man, I do not want to hunt around your clever layout, just give me the fucking text to read.
>>109882650I like it
>>109882657https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=userbar+tutorial
>>109877240What does the fitness function look like though?
>>109874058doesn't scale to mobile well + expensive and its too stylized to replace a designer whenever
>>109874058Homosexuality stopped being cool
