[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • You may highlight syntax and preserve whitespace by using [code] tags.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: lunduke won.png (204 KB, 687x242)
204 KB PNG
Lunduke OS is now the #12 Linux disro, beating OpenSUSE, Omarchy and Artix.
>>
>>109879371
distrowatch page hits have nothing to do with how many people use a distro.
i don't see any reason why someone who uses linux regularly would be using distrowatch. i used to visit it when i was new to linux, but haven't visited it in over a decade
>>
>>109879426
You're replying to a bait thread.
>>
>>109879371
>falsely boosting the retards ego with a worthless metric
This will work well with lunduke since he's been using distrowatch as hard data since "Linux Sucks".
>>
6 days ago he linked to the distrowatch page in a video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qz_bhrLnARM)
now, if you sort by last 7 days on distrowatch lcos is there
remember that distrowatch rankings are based on page visits
this means nothing
>>
>>109879842
at best it could be construed as interest in distros by people looking into trying linux. that's how i used it, but even that's iffy since i used to look at heaps of weird distros because they looked weird, with no intention of actually using them.
>>
These are among the same people who have been trying to change the mission of the free software movement since day one. They dont deserve your attention.
>>
>>109879842
>>109879426
everything you don't like is wrong. typical fossboy basement dweller
>>
>>109879928
people have been warning against using distrowatch page hits since long before lunduke's distro was a thing
>>
>>109879371
>Jewduke is happy because he won a made-up "popularity" contest based on how many people will click on link in his video description.
>Even despite this massively abusable system, it's not even in top 10 after a week.
>>
>>109879371
what and wtf is Lunduke....
nvm me like
>>
>>109879371
>the one tech reporter who actually calls out bad actors in tech/open-source is a zionist jew
its over
>>
>>109879943
but people only aggressively remind others of this fact when there is immense hatred against a given distro. that's how you know there's propaganda against it
>>
>>109881236
that's one possible way to think about it. i honestly don't know the first thing about ... [checks screenshot] LCOS. i don't know what it's based on, i don't know what it's goals are or anything. i only know people have for a long time used distrowatch as a kind of authority on popularity, which it has never been.
>>
>>109881322
it's obvious lcos only got popular on the site because people saw the video and looked it up. but given that this is still genuine attention as opposed to botted distros that are stale and garner zero attention yet still place higher than twelfth on the website it is disingenuous to make the fake stats argument now.
>>
>>109881406
again, people like me have argued that using the distrowatch page hit ranking as evidence of distro popularity doesn't work and have argued this for a long time. this is not a case of "suddenly pointing this out now that it doesn't benefit something"
>>
>>109881480
you are being disingenuous again. malicious even, if I knew better. op's point should be better thought of as a reaction against distrowatch retards used to give their garbage distros a leg up (ex. the ones op then proceeded to list) instead of an innocent belief in the veracity of distrowatch. there is a reason pushback against distrowatch happened to lcos which rarely happens for any similar g thread.
>>
>>109879426
I've never even been to that website.
>t. 15 years linuxfagging
>>
>>109880438
genuinely
>>
File: yakub-and-shopping-cart.jpg (198 KB, 800x1000)
198 KB JPG
>>109879371
despise niggers like lunduke and dhh inserting themselves between cash donors and the people actually doing the work.
>>
File: 1765153687292139.png (120 KB, 680x592)
120 KB PNG
>>109879371
Why does he go through the effort of highlighting things in his videos when he uses that shitty filter that makes it impossible to read anything.
>>
>>109879371
He looks like he is wearing one of those disguises with glasses and a huge nose and a mustache. Also, I don't understand why he cares about a kernel having Rust in it. What difference does the systems language make?
>>
>>109885270
The problem is that rust is the de-facto ai language, and that rustfags are incompetent and cocksure. Thus they generate garbage code (even worse than the c code in the kernel, which is already shitty).
>>
did you know that lunduke is not his real name? he acts the same as all the other jews
>>
>>109879371
I like Lunduke sometimes, but he's obviously pozzed.
>>
>>109879842
let's get lunduke linux to #1
I'll make the logo
>>
>>109886369
the C code in the kernel is as good as C gets

>>109885270
there is nothing wrong with Rust
conservatives just hate the community
>>
>>109886448
>the C code in the kernel is as good as C gets
For an average freshman maybe. It's garbage quality by any professional metric. Linus was always a hack and literally the first release of linux didn't even work and the community had to fix it. Literally poo in loo tier.
>>
>>109886458
show me good C code then
>>
>>109886460
you're replying to a bot
>>
>>109886460
https://github.com/sqlite/sqlite



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.