[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1764095397188888.jpg (863 KB, 3060x4080)
863 KB JPG
How crazy would it be to think that printers are programmed to print a bit worse every time they're used?
Epson TX115 I got a few years ago and I use once or twice a year, same print settings and same printhead
Front: ORIGINAL firmware
Back: custom firmware WITHOUT COUNTERS (ink, pads, printhead)
>>
Put the counts back in your custom firmware and do a print at 0 and a print at a high number, that’s a proper A/B test.
>>
is there a printer shill campaign on /g/ that i'm not aware of?
>>
>>109883497
Consumer printers are sold for 0 profit (or even at a loss) to make you buy them and then they rip you off with the ink cartridges which by the way cost less than 25 cents to make.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.