[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • You may highlight syntax and preserve whitespace by using [code] tags.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: HS1bH5zaUAAFcD9.png (88 KB, 1920x1080)
88 KB PNG
i don't think nearly anyone, myself included, has truly internalized there'll soon be a machine better than us in every single intellectual & physical capacity
deep down we all share a feeling that our 'entrepreneurship' or 'taste' or... is special & safe. it isn't. it's over

there's still breakthroughs to be made to get here, but we'll solve them. models will learn on the fly, with data efficiency greater than humans, with greater taste and judgement and empathy than we can possibly imagine

no investor, no startup guy, no counselor, no content creator, no musician will avoid going the way of the software engineer and mathematician

not to say that we won't find economic success or human artisinal value or whatever in these fields. just that our raw capacity will be greatly surpassed, without a question

creating the catchiest or most 'beautiful' literature and poetry and music from the view of any blind human judge will all be bested by AI

’but AIs will lack emotion or can’t love’ is true at a functional level, they won’t be human, but they will be better at us at making other humans ’feel loved’ than you, the perfectly tuned balance of caring yet real and tough when needed but ultimately forgiving
>>
Intellectual, maybe. A low maybe. Physical? No. Not even close.
>>
>>109888038
Physical as in a general replacement for a human body that does everything a human can do? No.
As in many different specialized robots, each for completing a single or a few tasks a human does, but better? Yes. Much simpler and much more effective.
>>
File: file.png (538 KB, 1058x2026)
538 KB PNG
hmm
>>
>>109888153
The early 21st century will be remembered as a time of absolute lunacy. fucking techbros found out theres billions to be made and trillions to be wasted on reinventing everything from scratch, destroying all the old systems that work only to end up with a far worse replacement.
We already have perfectly good, purpose built industrial robots, but we have to rape them in to a human form for some reason only for them to eventually morph back in to their industrial form.
Uber morphed in to a regular taxi service and reinvented the bus. streaming is turning in to a worse version of cable and every few years some retard tries to reinvent the train.
the sooner the age of the tech bro comes to an end, the better off mankind will be.
>>
>>109888242
This is not a tech problem, this is a marketing problem.
>>
>>109888242
>We already have perfectly good, purpose built industrial robots, but we have to rape them in to a human form for some reason only for them to eventually morph back in to their industrial form
What the fuck are you on about? This is a false dichotomy, specialized robots aren't going away.
>>
>>109887970
Man who gives a shit just go kill rich people until we get ubi
>>
>>109887970
>>109888188
Another bot shill thread
I’m so sick of this world
The only good thing is feeling the widespread anger and negativity and knowing this is what it feels like before societies die
>>
>>109887970
>coding
"""writing code""" is like being a white collar factory worker. by and large it's repetitive, brain dead work that requires minimal to no judgement. it shouldn't be a surprise that probability weighted sentence constructors can be adept at slapping together framework boilerplate and code snippets. it's also not a surprise that probability weighted sentence constructors fail at real world tasks that require judgement, or tasks that cannot be binary pass/fail tested in a closed test environment.
>>
>>109888188
wow a histrionic bluecheck freak said something short sighted and stupid after an LLM raped his brain?
>>
>>109888335
He's the creator of chatgpt
>>
>>109888772
>man smells own farts, sees god
>>
>>109887970
Riddle me this, how will LLMs get better, when they've already consumed all the world’s available data? How can LLMs create something original and not derivative slop?
>>
>>109888038
>>109888153
Imagine if you will an army of humanoid robots, powered by the raw intelligence of jeets wearing VR headsets thousands of miles away in Mumbai.
>>
>>109888884
Rape simulator 2086
>>
>>109888874
They collect all the data from the chat
>>
>>109887970
Can you maybe stop being such a fucking faggot?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.