Linux has a Windows emulator, but no OS-X emulator (?)
Isn't called canary? Or is that something else?Also wine is not an emulator
>>109914607freetards could have had a macos emulator if they didn't abandon gnustep in favor of gtk and qt
Win(dows Emulator) Is Not An Emulator, also https://github.com/darlinghq/darling
>>109914695>cannot run a single executable ok
>>109914701false
>>109914715let's see how it runs any appstore app
>>109914727it's apple not amazon
https://github.com/kholia/OSX-KVM
>>109914784löl
>>109914607Who would want to emulate that crap?
>>109914881/thread
ARM emulation on x86 is still in its baby steps. The only reason it's in any decent shape is because of Android.
>>109914881iTODDLERS BTFO
>>109914892This is SO false.
>>109914900You mean true.
>>109914900ARM on Windows barely works what makes you think Linux would work better.
>>109914907>clearly writes "false">"You mean true"Can't even set the frame. Smh.
>>109914913Ever heard of QEMU?
>>109914881Yep what can you do on a macos that you cant do on windows
Huh? Always been posible to emulate
there's a "wine" for mac os applications, though it's largely a proof of concept last i checkedhttps://www.darlinghq.org/key difference is that there's windows programs people want to run.
>>109914607whats on mac worth emulating aside from the terminator dvd menu zarvox voice?
What would be the point? Ideally everything would run natively, so WINE itself is a compromise. Name one usecase OSX covers that an improved WINE theoretically couldn't. And would that usecase be worth maintaining an entire secondary compatibility layer?
>>109914607>no OS-X emulatorWe tend to do things based on utility on Linux.If it was needed, someone would do it.
all the best programs on osx are ports of linux programs ;)
there's nothing osx has that would really make someone spend the amount of time and effort that wine commands to make an equivalent>all these people who think op means vm'slmao
>>109915311shit wrong pic
>>109914607Linux (itself) is OS-X emulation. (Poors) will never understand this.
>>109915175most freetards use wine to run windows games, since there are no exclusive games on macos there is no point
>>109914607Is anyone interested in running any OS X programs other than those who get that shit from work or the fanboys who have already been inducted into the cult and wouldn't touch a Linux PC in the first place?
>>109915040can i crack logic pro and run it on a shitty laptop running virtualized macos from 2011 i just want to make music
>>109915569Exactly. It's crazy though since for over a decade the biggest argument against Linux was "no games". Now the goalpost has moved onto "no Photoshop"/specialized productivity software which WINE will eventually encapsulate too.If only freetards could understand what makes the Adobe suite so great instead of tackling individual applications. But this is another usecase where creating an OSX compatibility layer would have no benefit over simply improving WINE.
>>109915695The modern adobe creative cloud sucks assCS6 is enough for me
