Will there EVER be anti gravity technology?
>>109924600Depends if humans make it past all the great filters required to discover it. First we have to figure out how to adapt to climate change and somehow avoid WWIII -> WWIX if we even make it that far.
>>109924600Scientists can't even explain gravity on Earth.How could they ever overcome it?
Gravity has never been proven.
>>109924600Under current models anti-gravity would violate conservation of energy. I do not expect anti-gravity to be possible.
>>109924892>doesn't understand sciencelol
>>109924600it already exists but its not for the public to havepretty sure lockheed/skunk works figured it outbut thats why i wear this hatthe 'ufo's we see arent le aliens
>>109924917based and true my fellow redditor. SMDH at these christcucks.
a table or a coathook are antigravity if you think about it
>>109924600https://antigravity.google/
>>109924600>AntigravityAt this point in history you're pretty much asking for magitech. We don't even know how gravity works, much less how to fuck with it.
>>109924600Not possible saaarGoes against the laws of physics saaar
>>109924741it's already been discovered, artard. what has to be discovered is the will for it.because the existing hydro-carbon based financial economy will not allow a quantum technology powered society
>>109924600First we need to rippen spacetime.
>>109924600RIPPEN
>>109925308i feel like this idea may have been explored but if you were to wear a suit weaved with engineered alloys and use two electromagnets with their strength modulated by your position on the y axis to keep a complete indifference in gravitational pull it might work. or the suit will rip you limb from limb
>>109924600Gravity and time are intertwined so to control gravity, we also need to control time.In other words, we will invent a time machine first before a gravity manipulator.
>>109924600why is the gravitron so based
>>109924600There must be, else whats UFOs?
>>109924600honestly no, neverreason why is G-d does not want you tosame reason double slit experiment where "The particle must have gone through both slits." but when you start observing it does not, but yet it does, you can blame many things, but none of them are proven, and same reason we do not see angels anymore, it is not in G-ds will a this time for us to know
>>109925908made up crapaliens do not exist, there is no alien life, there will never be alien life found anywhere
>>109925942> there is no alien life, there will never be alien life found anywhereThen what are angels and demons??? Also UFO ≠ aliens. It could imply it, or infer it, but I was purely talking about the technology we see in confirmed real UFO footage. It is clearly anti-gravity. Is it human? Is it ayyysss?? Idk. Thats not what im talking about.
>>109925986they are not alien life
>>109924600one motherfucker did this at the fair in town. He leaned back too far and rippen through that canvas ceiling above him. I guess it fling him about a block away before he landed in somebody's yard. They still use the same machine, but there's a huge duct tapped patch over one of those triangles in the ceiling.
>>109924600>Will there EVER be anti gravity technology?no. the added mass caused by the presence of your mom on the earth's surface is a major factor in preventing such technologies from being invented
>>109925034again I never mentioned studies or whatever, my point is that you don't even under what science is, nor do the wojaks in the pic, the criticism is the same.Science is a methodology and is about evidence and building useful models (and be ready to throw them away as soon as they no longer are), not about proof, and neither you nor these wojaks understand that simple fact."trust the science" is literally an unscientific statement.
>>109925034>>109926607Anyway, you cannot do science without a healthy amount of skepticism and that includes towards le studies (which most are bullshit anyway).I was just making fun of you for using the word proof and gravity in the same sentence.
>>109925942What is the source of that text?
>>109924917no hes not wrong. gravity isnt a force, its just an emergent property of matter
>>109925301>>109925308>>109926467click the threadctrl+f 'rippen'leave
>>109928303
>>109928303based
>>109928303Same. /x/ was rad
>>109924741The great filter is actually women/sexual reproduction, as well as ageing
>>109925510time is just a way to measure entropy, you cannot go back in time because you have to reverse entropy in the entire universe
>>109928303RIPPEN
>>109924892You can't "prove" gravity. "Proving" is for mathematicians and other retards of humanitarian pseudosciences.
>>109925144This
>>109924600Wasn't that motherfucker at the fair in town?
>>109929393The great filter is AI and we are losing to it.
>>109924600for sure not until we know what gravity actually isso far all theories of gravity fail to explain everything and all model it differentlymy balls say that figuring out dark matter would be the keyif it's particle based (gravitons) then it might be possible to generate them, or repel them with an extraordinary amount of energy, though it might be orders of magnitude less energy than strapping a bomb to your assif it's actually some kind of side effect of mass-energy like warping space-time, then we might be able to warp it ourselves in the other direction, neutralizing itbut again these are just spitballing while drunk, we literally don't understand gravity at all, very annoying
>>109924600I saw a silent flying saucer once. It was at about 100 meters altitude good 200 meters away, it was dark at around 0500 AM. It moved so smoothly towards me, stop about 100 meters from me, then shoot off at mad speed... this was not human made and it was not using any form of propulsion we know of... it was literally floating as if it was immune to gravity. So yeah, there is a way...
>>109933539damn, it rippen through the sky
>>109924600TPTB whack anyone that gets close
>>109924600rippen
>>109924600Not in your lifetime, so why bother.
Anti-gravity isn’t real>but inertial reduction and therefore a reduction in effective mass isFaster Than Light isn’t real>but what if you could alter the relative permeability and permittivity of your region of space to artificially raise or lower the maximum values of cAliens are fake and gay. It’s the government, more specifically the AEC/DoE with military partners. Anyone that says “you can’t hid science” is retarded. The government put enormous pressure on the APS to not publish any fission related studies during the development of our first nuclear weapons. They even made a classified journal system so that sci-niggers could publish, because apparently no one wants to work on classified anything if they can’t publish
https://medium.com/@AdamPaigge/local-cancellation-of-gravity-by-means-of-anti-phase-standing-high-frequency-gravitational-wave-815403c3023fSlowly getting there.
>>109928303Same
>>109924763Science does not explain anything.
>>109924600after room temp super conductors
>>109924600A recent study (~2 months ago) found a quantum effect that under certain circumstances creates a force opposite to gravity for a very short amount of time. If they can somehow use that effect then maybe we will have anti gravity in 20 years or so.
>>109926088Who is "they"?
>>109926503Its only OPs mom's ass. Boota be bangin
>>109924600It already exists it's just not as useful as we thought and mostly its just used ala STAR WARS i.e. disinformation and pressuring adversaries into wasting money, people and resources into dead ends.
>>109937891They are angels, they are like gravity not in a measurable or detectable force, unless that is what G-d's will is
>>109937909Angels and demons are described in the bible and all evidence suggests for several thousand years they were understood to be literal and very real by general human thought. In addition, all evidence suggests, previous to the biblical conceptions of Angels and demons, other entities by various different names but reasonable comparison to angels and demons, were likewise perceived as literal and very real. No evidence suggest the vast majority of discovered human culture, that generally humans thought other "spiritual" entities were not real. The conclusion is only this sliver of time we live in of "modern thinking" is correct, that we are alone, or we are wrong and most of human history is correct. The former conclusion, supports the linear progression theory of modern academics who believe humans generally are on a trend line of improvement to the past, with only minor dips. The latter, supports the theory of lost knowledge and that maybe past humans were not retarded cavemen, but just lacked certain tools we have today, while also allowing the possibility of them having tools we dont have today.
no
>>109924600yea
>>109940735NO
>>109924892you can't but AI can
