[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: bgest6eusbsh1.png (3.13 MB, 1920x2092)
3.13 MB PNG
How do we respond without sounding like a tin-foil hat wearer?
>>
Best way to prevent AI going rogue is to make the companies responsible for AI actions. If your AI does something illegal you go to jail. Doesn't matter if you asked the AI to do it or not. The companies should take responsibility, not the user who put in the prompt.
>>
>>109934115
Terry davis and peta jensen was right.
>>
But what if I download a copy of Deepseek and tell it to go rogue?
>>
>>109935392
>you go to jail
all C-level employees and board members go to jail, no bail or parole, all assets seized



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.