>USB Type-C
What exactly is wrong with it?
>>109944304It's Jeet Tech
>>109944318Why?
>>109944329slow/weak/frail/shit etc.
you have apple to thank for forcing the industry to do all the heavy lifting to destroy the lightning cable by any means necessary
>>109944336>t. lighting shill
>>109944336>slowFaster than any USB before it>weakIn what way?>frailSometimes, but mainly due to poor chinese quality, not the spec itself.>shitMeaningless vague descriptor. Be more specific.
>>109944354the "spec" is a fucking joke
>>109944401What specifically makes it a joke?
>>109944294It took too long to take over. A universal standard for PC and phone that doesn’t need to be rotated 5 times to get it in is perfect.
>USB type shiii....that was the joke OP was trying to go for
>>109944412FUCK YOU
>highest data rate>highest power deliveryHaters can get fucked.
>>109944294Amerimutt iphone paypig
>>109944336No. It's fast/strong/robust/quality.
>>109944336What would you want it to be instead?
I miss 3.5mm
>>109945849>highest power deliveryStop raping my batteries. I don't care if it charges slowly. That's the point of charging anyway.
>>109947275The HMD Pulse I got this year still has a 3.5mm jack
>>109949345Then don't charge with the charger, plug it to your pc.
*breaks*
>>109944304Is it USB 1.0 speeds? 2.0? 3.0? 3.1 Gen 1? 3.1 Gen 2? 3.2 Gen 2? 3.2 Gen 2x2? 4.0 Gen 2x2? 4.0 Gen 3x1? Does it have data delivery at all? A power only USB-C cable is fully within spec as are 120G USB-C speeds without power delivery. Let's not even get started on Alt Modes and USB-PD in general. Oh wait shit that's not USB-C that's actually Thunderbolt 3 whoops!>What exactly is wrong with it?
>>109949435What's your solution? Go back to Micro-USB? Every Micro-USB I've used has suffered the same fate: bending up and becoming unusable unless you angle it correctly before inevitably snapping at the base. "Skill issue." Sure but I haven't had this happen with any of the USB Type-C. Thinking about this makes me a little nostalgic because before I succumbed to NEETdom I worked in an electronics department right when USB Type-C was entering the scene and would have to help grumpy boomers figure out why their phone plug wasn't plugging right.Side note, I fetched pic related to contribute more to this thread and bizarrely this happened to me for the first time just a week ago when my grandmother's kitten got a hold of my cable.
lol third world brownoid detected
>>109952655bosnia is not a third world, greenoid.
>>109944294Why does it feel so fucking fragile?
>>109949478So you want 10 fucking ports on your machine for every separate speed bump? Are you retarded?
>>109944347>the industryapple played a major part in coming up with the usb C standard and i'm convinced they made it shitty on purpose
>USB Type-C>weird face.png>Doesn't explain shitNiggas starting shit for no reason.
>>109949478>*blocks your fatuous assertion*heh, nuthin personnel, kiddo
>>109953571>the only solution to a shit spec is breaking it into 23094823 different shit specs>what? demands reasonable standards? at least an easy consistent way to tell a charging cable from a data cable? PFFFFT what are you retarded bro?Please sterilize yourself at least, take daddys shotgun to the nuts or something.
>>109944304Wears too easily, phones gunk up easily with lint being compacted down and all of them wear down faster than any USB 1.0, mini, micro that I handled.
>>109944304because it's more like Type-CRINGE
>>109953946>wears down faster than mini/micro usblmao>usb 1.0...is not even a connector
>>109949478which is the exact same as USB-Ait's insane how many retards cannot understand the concept that USB-C is just a connector shape like USB-A was, i'm curious as to what your *superior* proposed solution would be
>>109956252>which is the exact same as USB-A>it's insane how many retards cannot understand the concept that USB-C is just a connector shape like USB-A wasObjectively and completely wrong but nice job repeating what you've been told by retarded """"""tech"""""" tubers.
>>109956498Hey why don't you complete the uniformed but self important nigger trifecta and claim that USB-4 is Thunderbolt.
>>109944294TOTAL USB TYPE-C VICTORY
I love USB-C and have no problem with it. I think the people crying about it are histrionic whiners.
>>109956498...care to explain how usb-c isn't just the shape of the physical connector then?
>>109944304No real equipment uses it so you end up having to have adapters sticking out of the front of the PC or just ignore them and plug everything into the back there the real USB are. >t. workstation has USB C bullshit on it
>>109956252>i'm curious as to what your *superior* proposed solution would beUSB A. The real normal USB. THE USB
>>109958922>cannot even fucking readas i've already pointed out, USB-A isn't in any way immune from this, it's the exact same thing except maybe for the fact that [sometimes] usb-a cables have the connector color coded (blue for 3.0 and up... and nothing else really I think? some mobos use teal/red for higher speed ports but I don't think that's standard and I've never seen cables follow that color pattern).plenty of power only usb-a cables too, thunderbolt/pd/video out and other shit like that doesn't apply only because usb-a literally doesn't (officially at least, i think) support any of that stuffso... yeah that's not an answer to my question, retard.
>>109944294Problem?
>>109944294It's a good port until it breaks tbdesu
>>109946321>muh iphone boogytechApple has been using USB C for a while now.
Never had any USB connector fail on me.If you are a retard you deserve to pay the retard tax for breaking your shit.
>>109953513Because of how short the plug is compared to USB A.
