New AI tier list just dropped
I like NASA
>>109944971Where does Linus Torvalds sit?
>>109945044Under the desk
>pontificate the stench
>no intel>no applenani?!?
>>109945409Why would they be there?Intel is a joke and Apple is so far behind and not even trying.
>>109944971gee billy, two palantirs?
>>109944971Wait, I thought he and Musk are now sworn enemies?
>>109945409They're not big AI players. They've both stagnated. Apple in particular is waaay behind in the AI arms race.
>>109945426Keep your enemies close, literally
>>109945419>>109945436intel has Gaudi 3 and HBM2e which runs 30b models pretty competitively to nvidia at simlar price point performanceapple is on a roadmap which will see their inference performance 10x in coming years.nvidia may have been first to dominate, but intel and apple seem to be catching up.
jensen hates musk btw.
>>109945055They don't call him Jensen Huang for nothing.
>>109945473>intel has Gaudi 3 and HBM2e which runs 30b models pretty competitively to nvidia at simlar price point performanceI'll let you know when they get enough of a market share to be invited to the table>apple is on a roadmap which will see their inference performance 10x in coming years.If I am running at 50 km/h and you run at 25 km/h and I am accelerating at 25 km/h and you are accelerating at 20 km/h, when will you catch up to me?
>>109944971>servicenowkek WHAT
>>109945549is the answer never? because it sounds like it senpai
>>10994547330B model? Isn't that homebrew level?
>>109945575working class homebrew
Please Iran, do it... just this once... please Ayatolah...
>Dario in a naughty boy corner
>no altmanLol
>>109945549> If I am running at 50 km/h and you run at 25 km/h and I am accelerating at 25 km/h and you are accelerating at 20 km/h, when will you catch up to me?You won't catch me. I'm slower to start (25 vs. your 50 km/h), but I'm also accelerating more slowly, so the gap only grows.I'll assume the accelerations are per hour (km/h per hour, i.e., km/h2), since "25 km/h" as an acceleration is missing a time unit.Speeds over time (t in hours):You: v = 50 + 25tMe: v = 25 + 20tGap in speed: (50 + 25t) − (25 + 20t) = 25 + 5t km/hThat gap is positive at t = 0 and increases every hour, so you're pulling away faster and faster. Setting the speed gap to zero would need t = −5 hours, which is in the past, meaning that if we had been running like this earlier, I would have been faster than you until 5 hours ago, but that's not the situation now.What about position? If you're ahead at t = 0 (or even starting at the same spot), the distance between us is:Gap = (25t + 2.5t2) + starting leadThat's always increasing, so there's no positive time when I close it. The only way I'd catch you is if I started far enough ahead of you, and even then, only if the numbers were reversed (my acceleration higher than yours).Bottom line: never, with these numbers. If I wanted to catch you, I'd need to either be accelerating faster than you or start with a higher speed.(Also, a practical note: at 25 km/h2, after 10 hours you'd be doing 300 km/h. Neither of us is sustaining that on foot!)
>>109944971grim
>>109945780Congratulations, what do you think was the point of the post you quoted and attempted to answer?
the only way humanity is making it past year 2500 is a earthquake hitting that building and everyone in it dies painfully
>>109945426Because you are a retard who fell for the scripted kabuki theatre.
Was it supposed to look like a micro-controller or is it a trick the AI demiurge is playing on us.
>>109945419Apply shouldn't be discounted on the hardware side. Their mac studios are all sold out because people are scooping up anything even remotely useful for hosting LLMs
>>109945409Apple has Apple Intelligence (AI), why would they acknowledge this new "Super Intelligence" product they didn't invent?
>>109945557you didn't know? you need AI to shit up your ticketing system for.... uh........ reasons?!
>>109944971>micron>sanjayfucking kill me
>>109944971At least we know Micron is in good legs
