could a programming language made entirely with slurs be used to prevent AI from reading your code?
>>109949160Safety protocols aren't inherent to the models, it's mostly tacked on top of it. Its only a matter of weeks when open weight models have the safety features put on by the original maker get removed.
>your codeNo one cares about anyone's code anymore because it's all generated by AI trivially.Software isn't a moat.
>>109949160but which model would you use to make a new language entirely of slurs?
if nigger == faggot == nigger: kike(nigger);else: kike(faggot)
>>109949160gonna steal your idea
>>109950212>forgot a semicolonthat's not compiling anon...
>>109950212>language made entirely with slurs>only keywords are 'if' and 'else'ffs anon
You don't have to create a new programming language. You can obfuscate your code with macros if your language of choice supports it.
>>109950167oh shit...
>>109949160This could be a solution if we had non cucked places to host because neither Github,Code Vault or Drew's website would want offensive language. None of the mainstream models normies access will do that either. Only offline or rogue ones people have to pay for will read that code
>>109950212>If>ElseYou fucking retard
>>109950212tranny nigger == faggot == nigger:kike(nigger);gook:kike(faggot);
>illegal programming languagethat would be funny
>>109949160Why does this thread remind me of the following?http://lhartikk.github.io/ArnoldC