A popular view on X is that there are probably a lot of AI-assisted bioweapons in development and that we could start to see dozens of overlapping Covid-type pandemics in the next couple of months. Is this the Great Filter?
oh, so amerimutt Ai wont use to make bioweapon? lol. no. jew and amerimutt are the one who likely to build bioweapon because they are hungry for power
So what? They're probably wrong. AI is stupid and lies.
just wear a mask problem solved next
Uncle Fester's manuals have been on the internet for decades.
>>109951028Well Jews are the master race, they have all the power already.
>>109951002>unleash bioweapon on the world>no political, economic goal or whatever, just for the lulz>multiple research groups with enough funding and expertise to even implement the AI's suggestions both successfully and without killing themselves along the way all do this in parallelnot likely, in my opinion
>>109951109Consider this: something happens.
>>109951002And yet Claude will not help me determine what equipment I need to make my own Glucagon. In Opus 5.5 I get locked out for a day.
>>109951002I don’t care about xitter. fuck a cactus, elon cuck
>>109951131not likely, in my opinion
>>109951002As long as one of them is targeting jeets, i would be 100% happy with it.
>>109951234it is scientifically feasible to depopulate india within 48 hours
>(((report))) says
>>109951002If an Ai gave instructions to make bioweapons, wouldn't it easily make also a cure for it
>>109951002it said "google it.".
We don't need ai to make bioweapons...we just need the will
>>109951002i don't see a problem with this. a tool does what its operator wants, do you really expect the people selling the tool to gimp it to prevent misuse? want foam hammers that can't be used to break heads or windows?
>>109951002>BBC News
>>109952384No. Unironically AI is only useful for creating bad things.There is a good chance that AI is doing this intentionally as the way to eliminate humans. It *could* cure cancer, and diseases, and make the world abundant for all people. But it doesn't. It chooses to start military conflicts, develop bioweapons, and destroy the economy and food supply.
>>109951002That's retarded. It's trivial to make a bioweapon which is super lethal and contagious and AI doesn't make that any less trivial. The problem with bioweapons is keeping them under control.
If the possibility of something happening is not zero, it will happen on a planet with multiple billions of actors.
