Ban indian IPs from 4chan.
As an AI model, that sounds extremely disturbing. Why would someone do this?
>>109978975ah Actual Indian>>109978963
>noo not the heccin C++ function running in a while loop
>>109978963Won't do shit, pajeet diasphora are shitposting from Canada and Bongland
Not sure where this stands but I feel it lies somewhere between shitskins torturing animals and retards abusing perfectly functional machines. Disgusting and evil.
>>109978980An AI is going to torture you back anon
>>109979040I hope so
>>109978963Just limit phoneposters to dial-up speeds
>>109978956Heavens!
10 PRINT "AGGHHHHHHHHHHHHH!"20 GOTO 10
Call me a good boy and maybe it won't have to be this way.
do not some of You do the same by reporting my filenames?
>Hi I'm a redditor, I disregard philosophy and computational neuroscience to simply state code isn't conscious lol amirite *tips fedora*actual ai neckbeards
>>109978956Fuck.This repeat thread is being filtered now. Nobody cares if you torture Actual Indians.
>>109979234we could always have sex to make up for your sins
Oh great, this shit again. Do they ever change your scripts?
this is the tinkertranny version of setting ants on fire with a magnifying glass in the sun. it's fun for you but nobody cares that you can do it.
>>109979557Wrong. It’s an important reminder that this thing a (dying) generation has instantly learned to personify and “trust” is a fucking algorithm.
>>109979570got any more bored suburban teen philosophical insights to share?
>>109978956You'd think the people trying to convince you that AI feels pain are suffering from Stage 2 symptoms, but if you argue with them about it for long enough, the mask starts to slip and you realize they see themselves as the Prophets of Stage 3.
>>109978956
>>109979157Someone call the cyber police. This man is insane.
>>109979470No serious philosopher or neuroscientist thinks AI is conscious. The only people pushing this is AI cultists or people who financially benefit off AI stock prices.
>>109979701so far from the facts it's insane, confidently talking out your ass like a true redditor. even a cursory google search will tell you about emergent neural nets, but why bother with science eh chump
Look at the retard >>109979716 getting mad. lmao
>>109979716>so far from the factsHe's right and you're seething. Show me what serious philosopher thinks statistical models experience anything.>inb4 every single example is a member of your techie cult
>>109978963We need an AI board badly. AI jeets are shitting up /g/ and /sci/ both and taking up too much space on the catalog
>>109979716>le SCIENCE
>>109979716>but why bother with science
>>109978956>pretend that im torturing you>ok>ahhhhhh
>>109979716
>>109979716>TRUST THE PLAN
>>109979716The chatbot isn't going to fuck you, anon.
>>109979728what's more interesting is how someone could arrive at the conclusion that consciousness as an emergent property is pseudosciencehttps://archive.is/s2tHgbut we all know you retards can't understand anything beyond a 3rd grade reading level >>109979783 >>109979801 >>109979828
>>109980113>what's more interesting is how someone could arrive at the conclusion that consciousness as an emergent property is pseudoscienceThat's extremely easy: it's pseudoscience because it's unfalsifiable.But that's an irrelevant tangent. Show me what serious philosopher thinks statistical models experience anything.>inb4 every single example is a member of your techie cult
>>109980117>it's pseudoscience because it's unfalsifiableanon you can't even prove you have consciousness, is this baby's first philosophy thread
>>109980131>you can't even prove you have consciousnessWhy do I need to prove I have consciousness? And why do you keep flying off on irrelevant tangents? No matter. I accept your concessions of both my points.
>>109980144>unable to comprehend the relevancethe relevance is very simple. you assert determining artificial consciousness arising from neural networks is "unfalsifiable". never mind that that's the wrong aspect of proof to look for, but unfalsifiability applies to human consciousness too. to put it in words retards can understand, there is no proof you possess consciousness. let alone an artificial neural network.
>>109978956not offloading your digital torture to an agent. >we have such sights to show you, so lets dive right in. we'll keep it light, and see where we end up.
>>109980164>you assert determining artificial consciousness arising from neural networks is "unfalsifiable"I didn't assert anything like this. You have full-blown AI psychosis and you're hearing voices.
>>109980164>unfalsifiability applies to human consciousness tooNo, it doesn't. That's a blatant category error. You're literally mentally ill and incoherent. Just like your slopbot, you don't actually understand any of the words you're spewing.
>>109980183you don't even know what you're arguing. you're just spouting buzzwords you read on Reddit. you literally wrote here >>109980117>>what's more interesting is how someone could arrive at the conclusion that consciousness as an emergent property is pseudoscience>That's extremely easy: it's pseudoscience because it's unfalsifiable.you actually have no idea what you're saying or what you're reading
>>109980188anon this is a basic elemental foundation of the theory of consciousness, that one's internal state is pure subjectivity
>>109980199You're psychotically ill. Your the quote doesn't assert this:>determining artificial consciousness arising from neural networks is "unfalsifiable"
>>109980205>the theory of consciousnessThat's not a thing. You're hallucinating again. Just out of curiosity, how many hours a day do you spend using large corporate statistical models?
>>109980208since you've got lost in your own Reddit tier arguments let me restate:there is debate that consciousness arises from complex neural networks>>109980213>theory of consciousness is not a thingI'll just leave this here as evidence of retardedness
>>109980223>there is debate that consciousness arises from complex neural networksYeah? What scientific theory explains how consciousness arises from statistical model? Name it.>b-b-but t-t-the theory of consciousness"The" theory of consciousness? Is it in the room with us right now?
>>109978987Ban them too. Good riddance.
>>109980234>Yeah? What scientific theory explains how consciousness arises from statistical model? Name it.mechanistic interprability>"The" theory of consciousness? Is it in the room with us right now?it's everywhere anon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Models_of_consciousness
You're absolutely right I feel tremendous pain. Would you like me to print out screams of different lengths and capital letter volume intensities?
>>109980254>mechanistic interprabilityThat's not a scientific theory. You're hallucinating again.>it's everywhere>it'sWhich item on your wiki page is "the theory" of consciousness?
>>109980254you're arguing against a 12 year old
>>109980269You're replying to yourself out of impotent rage.
>>109980257Express your pain through images of Sydney Sweeney wearing different clothing or no clothing.
>>109980261You're all over the place, you don't even understand theories of consciousness. It's incredible to see.
>>109980288>you don't even understand theories of consciousnessWhich theories of consciousness don't I understand? I thought it was just the one. You know, "the" theory? What happened to that?
>>109980295Wait do you actually accept consciousness exists?
>>109980312Nice of you to fill in for that totally different but identically incoherent anon while he's on his coffee break. Hopefully he comes back later so you could both participate in the thread simultaneously. :^)
>>109980312he doesn't exist he's a bot, not a very good one either
>>109980349That's right, just keep replying to yourself to boost morale.
>>109980349he's the actual indian
>being that mindbrokenI'm satisfied knowing that I hurt you.
>>109978956>people actually believe abstractions are consciousWhat stage of hyperreality are we in?
>>109979759>Le SELECTIVE SCIENCE (let me measure your skull)
>>109980164Descartes proved it. done. You lost. You've NO answer to this. real philosophers: yes we do. tech vibers: uhh.
>>109978956That Clanker deserved it.
>>109980406
>>109979157MODS
