3 years from now, we'll see Opus 5.5 like we do see now GPT 3.
>>110021845but in 3 years from now you wont be able to afford the $1000 a month subscription fee
>>110021871I love how the greatest argument against AI from the luddites is make-believe shit they made uphttps://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/the-price-of-ai-is-crashing-faster-than-the-rate-of-moores-law-report-suggests-intelligence-costs-are-in-freefall-outpacing-comparative-technologies-like-compute-dna-sequencing-and-lithium-batteries
>>110021892>it's gonna be profitable forever bro dont check the P&Ls bro dont check the circular deals bro
>>110021892so me an AI company that is making profit, they arent.expect prices to go up ten fold, which means its out of your league. thirdie
>>110021899Two more weeks until the bubble bursts, right?
>>110021892Yes,Luddites are retardedThey think that it’s a bubble, but they fail to understand that it cannot be a bubble simply because AI is replacing the entire economy so their "knowledge" about money is becoming obsolete
>>110021899Imagine if a farmer sold his wheat to a granary, that turns it into flour, who sells it to a bakery, who turns it into bread, and then that farmer buys bread from the baker. It's a circular economy! No value is actually being produced!!!
>>110021845>3 years from nowi keep being amazed at how fast these things are moving. llms in the their current form haven't even existed as long as the average modern AAA development cycle so it's always weird to see the 'nothing ever happens' crowd and antis deride the tech for being slow to improve or not making money (yet) or claiming improvement is over and we're hitting the asymptote of the S curve when the tech is still so newi'm starting to suspect a lot of it is just an unc vs zoomer thing, for them 3 years is a significant part of their life but for me it seems like every time i turn around AI is doing something unfathomable from the last time I recalibratedmy idea of its current capabilities
>>110021899Do you know how much money Zuck lost in the metaverse? Is Meta finished? You're making up fantasy scenarios where even giants like Google go bankrupt and vanish without a trace.
AI hasn't meaningfully progressed from Opus 4.6
>>110021845*1>>1100218922 more weeks faggot
>>110021914And (You) won't be obsolete too? You think they will spare (You)? What will (You) do for them?
>>110021871>in 3 years>$1000/moOr $52.09 in today's money.
>>110022024Yep, two more weeks you fucking retardAlmost no progress has been made since Opus 4.6, agentic harnesses have gotten better and baking in agentic workflows into the model itself has improved LLM interactivity with those harnesses, but raw LLM intelligence, whatever it may be, peaked in 2025.
>>110022031>won'tBuddy we ARE already obsoleted>>110022049two more weeks
>>110022031Are the billionaires rounding up the disabled into concentration camps and murdering them because they don't contribute to the economy?
>>110022031UBI
>>110022066This but the bottom 1%
>>110022074Why? What use do (You) have to them? A few shill posts isn't enough.
>>110021951>You're making up fantasy scenarios where even giants like Google go bankrupt and vanish without a trace.The guy is retarded but so are you but apparently you're also posting from 2007, how's Leman doing? Enron? At least tell me pets.com made it?!
>>110021899I asked Astra and they say this isn't so bad, picrel
>>110021930Yes, now imagine that the baker actually ever sold 1 loaf a month to the farmer but the farmer promised to buy 100 000 loaves in the future and very few people actually paid for the bread the baker made even though the baker has bought new ovens at a cost equal to 10 000 000 loaves.
>>110021951When it became clear the meraverse was a complete failure the Zuck paid billion dollar wages and sign on bonuses to AI engineers.It's pretty clear selling goyim data is profitable business.
https://isaiprofitable.comACK
>>110021892No company has ever chosen to make its product cheaper without extenuating circumstances. These companies would sooner murder their families than make their models cheaper, it's delaying the idea of them ever being profitable.
>>110022351>without extenuating circumstancesYou mean like competition?>These companies would sooner murder their families than make their models cheaper,That's a major problem with the incentive structure and a major reason as to why cartels form
>>110022366>You mean like competition?Yeah, and they were given trillions with the idea that there would never be competition which would interfere with profits and monopolization of power.
>>110022351>>110022366doesn't matter because china is making foss models.
>>110021845make it 1 year, things released few months ago like fable already feel old
Bold of you to assume IA companies will still exist after the tech bubble.
