Was he right?
>>110067457He studied calligraphy at college.Didn't know how to code.
>>110067468Yeah while high on LCD too
>>110067457Sure, based on his implicit assumptions. Now if we instead start with my assumptions, if someone who can't use a command line touches a computer then you fucked up.
>>110067457
>>110067457by end user he meant women and faggots and yes he was right
>>110067569But iFags think of that as a win tho?
For iToddler end "users" he isn't wrong.
>>110067457Let's see... Omarchy has over 150k installs in the first month of 4.0, has a community driven plugin marketplace with over 5,000 unique plugins, and over 200 themes on one of the main theme sites, thousands more spread across user GitHub repos...I'd say he was pretty fucking wrong imo
>>110067457Yes, his end users didn't need anything other than a browser to watch gay porn
>>110067569Uhhh... based Steve?
It still holds true today. Look at the gambit the anti-Linux MSjeets have taken for years.>oh it's too complicated you have to tinker in the terminalAll the research shows normal people hate the terminal and desktop metaphors seem to be the best alternative. Unless you're a programmer you probably have about zero use for a command line.
>>110067457If they (the goy brainless spender)
>>110068451Normalniggers hate desktops too. In fact they hate the whole ass web browsing experience. If they got something like that pin on star trek uniforms that they could just tap and go "hey computer, tell me what to think" they'd do that shit all day
>>110067457Who is this guy?
>>110068487Some dumb fuck who tried to cure his ass cancer with fruit
>>110067457his userbase is niggers. most despicable ecosystem, literally digital concentration camp, north korea tier
>>110067627Telling agents to use your computer for you is hardly different from what Jobs envisioned for the future of tech. Hell, he would have fucking loved LLMs and would be one of its biggest shills.
yes