Are the antis wrong when they say that AI isn't really intelligent because rather than the AI intuitively solving the problems OpenAI is just using their massive amounts of compute to do something more akin to bitcoin mining?
>>110077192they are not only wrong, they are retardedthey are also ugly and dysgenic, probably fat ugly leftards
Yes, they are wrong.
>>110077192LLMs can be pretty cool, but ultimately they're just r*ddit regurgitators
>>110077201>>110077202Why it take $30m in tokens to solve Navier-Stokes then??
>>110077277Because that was an old and comparatively weak model. Each paper in the 700+ math problem dump were solved with a single prompt that ran for about 3h on average
>>110077302>>110077277besides "30 million" was the current price they set for the tokens, its a meaningless numberits not like they paid 30 million in electricity for that run. Its like if someone broke into a hype shit store and stole "millions of dollars" in Supreme merch
>>110077192it's brute-forcing with extra steps (namely the AI "um ackshually"ing itself repeatedly)
>>110077192all intelligence is like that. human geniuses also required loads of data to come up with their breakthroughs. you have to mine reality and its representations like bitcoin to discover new patterns.
>>110077192AI isn't really intelligent about anything it is doing, in the traditional sense of the word. But turns out if you throw a gorillion dollars worth of compute and training data at them, LLMs can solve some problems even without any intelligence involved.
>>110077333except supreme merch has more valuable than whatever this (pic rel) male lesbian pedophile queefs out
