[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1774327261465145.mp4 (1.51 MB, 540x500)
1.51 MB
1.51 MB MP4
Your vibecoded project may be susceptible to lawsuits if a savvy person decompiles it and finds copyright-violating functions.
>>
>>110086313
>You are an expert lawyer. Remove all copyrighted code. Make no mistakes.
>>
>>110086313
That'd be fun but it's not how it works
>>
>>110086313
Begun the Decompiling War has.
>>
>>110086313
How will they sue something that doesn't exist? Specifically how will they fin copyrighted material when AI steals from an ∞ amount of people?
>>
File: 1763060527645752.png (34 KB, 562x255)
34 KB PNG
>>110086353
If an AI reinvents or regurgitates someone's licensed algorithm, e.g. pic-related when asked for "an efficient hsb to rgb function", then you've violated the law.
>>
>>110086353
Great bait, I love it
>>
>>110086313
>copyright-violating functions
>>
>>110086368
so why is google not suing all the chromium forks? they use their code and thing stealing it direcntly from the source
>>
>>110086403
Chromium's license allows forks.
>>
>>110086313
How are they gonna prove it's the same function and not just a similar approach? The result is gonna vary depending on what compiler and decompiler were used. If you do LLM-assisted decompilation and it spits out something identical to copyrighted code, that's on the LLM.
>>
>>110086430
ok but i dont allow it, i dont like that, i will now sue them as theyre susceptible to lawsuits because i disagree
>>
>>110086447
Plenty of people will be safe, plenty of people will be vulnerable.
You'll have to decide for yourself what that risk is for your project.
>>
>>110086484
>generic nontechnical normie rhetoric
Oh, well. Maybe someone else can inform me how you can prove that a decompiled function that's almost certainly going to be different from the original is a copyright violation.
>>
>>110086313
He's drinking through his right eye
>>
>>110086514
He's just moistening it a little.
>>
>>110086511
>Maybe someone else can inform me how you can prove that a decompiled function
Uhh, retard-kun? I was addressing this,
>The result is gonna vary depending on what compiler and decompiler were used.
I shouldn't need to explain to you how trivial it is to open C# binaries in ILSpy.
>>
>>110086514
His noise, high-melanin friend
>>
>>110086540
>works in my programming language
Who cares.
>>
>>110086627
>I am safe!!
Okay? The world doesn't revolve around you. Plenty of people need to know this.
>>
>>110086667
The world revolves around real programming languages. :^)
>>
File: file.png (430 KB, 780x438)
430 KB PNG
>>110086514
It's just a drinking problem.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.