>make logic problem solving his only meaningful skill and the one thing the truly enjoys>now make him enamored with computers>now make a computer that can solve every logic problem several orders of magnitude faster and cheaper than he does even if it gets things wrong sometimes
so pivot to hardwareloser
>>110090202>>110090348that gook math guy was right: the romantic age of logic and math is over. from now on we're in the industrial math era. good at math today is like being good at manually making beer bottles in 1850. nobody cares.
>>110090386artisanal goods still have a place where mass automation falters, be it in custom-fit or qualitymaybe we'll start seeing artisanal "100% human made" software soon
>>110090386jews were once specialist glass makers. one of the few trades that carved a niche out for themselves way back when. the only reason they're not valued now is because jews went into hollywood and finance.
>>110090486Why do you think it's called jewelry?
>make him born in the only period in history where it’s a viable career to sit in front of a logic problem solving machine>make him grateful that it happened, not regret that it’s over>make him remember that though it’s over, something new and exciting is rising that he can be a part of
>>110090525wholesome
>>110090386>>110090386Cool when can AI replace bankers though?
>>110090525if you have a net worth under 500 million you can't really participate in any role except that of one of the suckers though
>>110090658crybaby loser cope
>>110090704you're not part of the club lil bro
>>110090473>b-but you can still make $2 without AI if you work really really hardok but again nobody cares and you sound like a schizo yelling at datacenters. good luck with that income.
>>110090720I mean, you can also make $0 with AI since the marginal price of software trends towards zero and customer acquisition cost trends towards infinity as the barrier of entry to creating it sinks down lower and lowerthere will be a billion more builders but the same number of prospective clients, if not lessif yoh aren't charging for tokens or selling hardware, you're part of the suckers
>>110090202would be devastating if any of it were truethinking that “sometimes it’s wrong” is acceptable in enterprise & industry is quite something. as long as AI is stuck at the 95% correct tail, it cannot replace SWE’s.
>>110090789for reference, an AI that succesfully ccompletes a single step in any given task 99.99% of the time:>100 step tasks have a 99% (0.9999^100) success rate>10,000 step tasks have a 36.8% (0.9999^10000) success rate>50,000 step tasks have a 0.7% (0.9999^50000) success ratedue to this nifty little thing called compounding failurenow consider the fact that frontier models aren't anywhere near close to 99.99% successful task step completion
>>110090202why he hittin that young thug pose tho
>>110090789>thinking that “sometimes it’s wrong” is acceptable in enterprise & industry is quite something.I'm going to assume you've never actually had a job."Enterprise & industry" accept pretty much everything.
>>110090856>parallelize 50,000 one-step tasks>49,999 tasks doneheh, nothing personnal
>>110090936yeah bro I'm gonna put the pizza in the oven while I'm still raising the dough and buying the ingredients to make the doughsequential steps? what's that?
>>110090856kys
>>110090202Glad to see this meme making it's way to /g/.
>>110090936Unironically what some AI bros believe
>>110090789>Humans never get anything wrong guys!
>>110090789Yeah, human developers, unlike AI, are perfect. There have never been bugs in any software before AI. Software that was held together by duct tape and hope and that was full of historical mistakes and workarounds? Never existed.At least AI is not lazy so it actually writes test that verify that its code works. Helpful comments and relevant unit tests are the easiest way to tell AI generated code nowadays.
>>110090715I’m not trying to be. you have jeet grindset brain and will never be happy
