[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1764027233037369.jpg (107 KB, 1031x1085)
107 KB JPG
why do some developers do this?
>New version <verbose version number system>!
>Fixed crash
>Improved performance
>Improved compatibility

that's nice but what crashes? how was performance improved? and you improved compatibility for what? what even changed to "improve" it? i'm not asking for a hyber-verbose changelog detailing every single commit (that'd be nice too desu) but what the fuck?
>>
(((some))) developers
>>
File: 1779551854047570.png (191 KB, 770x600)
191 KB PNG
>>110107340
somebody should do something about them.
>>
>>110107226
They do it so that when you go to your fuckwit mid-level manager who hasn't touched a console in 20 years and try to get approval for your fucking enterprise network firmware, you don't get a bunch who-hashing-haranaging, worry-wimper, brainlet fucking pushback because your boss doesn't know what a fucking commit is and is scared you'll break something
>>
File: iui.jpg (10 KB, 474x209)
10 KB JPG



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.