Previous Thread: >>110076430>Links:>GPT-Image 2/2.5https://chatgpt.com/https://designer.microsoft.com/image-creatorhttps://copilot.microsoft.com/>Nano Banana Pro/2.1https://gemini.google.com/apphttps://labs.google/fx/tools/flowhttps://aistudio.google.com/prompts/new_image>MAI-Imagehttps://www.bing.com/images/create>Midjourney [PAID]https://www.midjourney.com/home>Meta AI (Muse Spark):https://ai.meta.com/>NovelAI [PAID]https://novelai.net/image>Perchancehttps://perchance.org/ai-text-to-image-generator>AI videoshttps://pixverse.ai/https://hailuoai.video/>Prompt Generatorhttps://tipseason.com/dalle-prompt-generator>Image-to-Prompt (reverse engineer prompts)https://convly.ai/image-to-prompt/>DALL-E 3 image generation guidehttps://files.catbox.moe/o4yihf.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/320rm1.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/8gge6o.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/dcokjf.png>Perchance generator listhttps://pastebin.com/XRGqaW4W>Related Boards>>>/vg/vig>>>/co/dall-e>>>/trash/aibf>>>/aco/mmai>>>/tg/slop
For the record, supposedly OpenAI was testing something during the weekend:https://www.testingcatalog.com/openai-possibly-testing-gpt-image-3/
>>110110595>>110110724>>110110779>big black womanb-but muh based anti-woke AI!!!
>>110110919If it was anti-woke, it wouldn't be putting clothes on girls when I very clearly want them to be naked.
Lol, Google restricted my access to Gemini, claiming I violated a non-consensual intimate imagery policy. Seems a bit stupid when humans can look similar and likeness is a huge gray space. If they want to enforce that I guess it requires a complex system of constant surveillance and evaluation of edge cases with probably high error rate.
>>110110972What does "restricted" mean in practice? Not being able to generate images at all? Does it extend to Flow and other services that rely on NB?
>>110110996Yeah can't use it at all (also AI studio). I got two or three previous email warnings apparently which I didn't see as I don't check that Gmail acc regularly.
>>110110972It is plain bullshit. It gives alerst of violating the image of individuals when the faces are generated by Gemini itself, or alerts against using images of minors when you post something like pic related as example, an image of a clearly grown and exaggeratedly proportionate woman, again, made by Gemini as well, or the always cool third-party interests".Corpo image gens are always kneecapet by the corporations controlling them.
>>110110972Were you genning realistic looking hoes?
>>110111045That's quite retarded and a bit scary (I don't generate photorealistic stuff, but I guess realistic painting might count, too). Do they offer the possibility to appeal and/or is the block temporary? Or are they basically telling you "fuck you, make another account and don't try to gen goon next time"?
>>110110919Besides, you can make her white and fit if you want.
>>110111195>Besides, you can make her white and fit if you want.Now gen both big black woman and thin white woman lmao
>>110111203Making out
>>110111067Yeah I think most images I used as source already had an AI watermark lol. But in general I see no realistic way for them to enforce that on realistic looking imagery. Could it be a real photo of some random non-famous person? No idea how they would consistently want to detect that.>>110111082Yep, mostly.>>110111184Seems permanent but I was given the option to make an appeal in less than 500 characters. Basically explained that these were fictional AI characters, with no likeliness intended etc. Let's see.
>>110111203Needs some fine tuning.
>>110111406Keep us informed if you stick around here. The characters limit sounds a bit condescending, but good luck.
>>110111424>Human foop>Human foopsDidn't cover that in my sex-ed class.
>>110111566Yeah, I got reinstated 30 minutes after my appeal. Also I now realize I probably autistically misread the policy label, which more likely says it thought I was creating images of non-consensual activity (which I didn't do as far as I know). I first thought this was about real people not consenting to have their likeness used etc. In any case, all a bit intransparent.
Grok Imagine has some new subscription model that includes extra crap for your X account. I switched to it, and so far it hasn't updated my usage even though I've been genning, so I have no clue if it's broken, bugged or just lagging behind in the display; the old quota updated instantly. They probably vibe coded it.
>>110112326They do obsess a lot about likeness, also. Well, at least it was fast.
This is more like it.
>>110115309Both extremes look less than ideal.I prefer the balance. Wide hips, enough muscle to be active and enough fat to be soft.
>>110115576The important thing is they seem to have worked it out.
TIL there's an actual, reachable, limit on free 3.8 Flash in AIStudio, but maybe I shouldn't have "tested" that on my main account.
>>110115993And what's the limit? What did it tell you?
>>110116068It says the usual:>You've reached your rate limit. Please try again later. And it asks you to link a (paid) API link. I was used to get that with 3.1 Pro, the limits for that model were always fairly low, but I never got it with 3.8 Flash before. The single discussion where I was losing my sanity was 155,996 tokens in total (4,293 input and 151,703 output) . But you have to add the various prompts I made before today, too.
>>110116136Hmm, seems like they upped the limits after the release of Saargon, I used to have some 200K token conversations and didn't hit it, that was some weeks ago
>>110116154Yeah, that's also possible, honestly I'm already half-surprised/half-relieved that they didn't remove the model for free altogether, considering what they've done with Gemini. Usually I don't have similarly long exchanges, though.
>>110118305I love a mature woman's stern face
>>110118574
>>110119518They're pointing and saying "You're awesome!" amirite?
>>110120008the thumbs are up so they're trying to kill you.now maybe >>110119504
>>110120120You know, that one actually looks much more like pointing-to-humiliate-like (Simpson's Nelson "ahah" like) than the playful finger gun (?) gesture in that other gen, I think.
>>110120221same prompt used on the grok and bing gen.
>>110120331Quite some variety in how they read that gesture, looking at the thumbs, too. I wonder if it's just me reading it differently.
>>110120331I bet they can unlock eachother's cellphones with those same faces
Oak photobombing my set
>>110121945that one webm with the thot at the beach and the boomer just walking close in the bg is epic shit
>>110121945Did you try out Flow eventually, anon?
Anyone that tried Venice can vouch if it's good or not?
>>110122053Yes. I am still trying to get how it works.Given the nature of the images I tend to make, it is no wonder it refuses to generate sometimes, but it does look like it is way better at keeping consistent looks and follow instructions, even if sometimes it is too literal. On Gemini, when I am not generating chunky ladies with huge asses, I make old looking 2D assets, and to make low resolution ones I often use prompts asking for a group of 20 sprites or something, for variety and cross contamination hallucinations, but on Flow it makes a single generated image for each one of the 20, with higher quality sure, but for some stuff lower resolution works best.
>>110122053Here's how Flow handled the same prompt and how Gemini did it. Both are good, but they have different uses.Flow is very trigger happy with the filters but it can do some cool stuff.
>>110122791>>110123845That might be because of how each model handles the specific request, perhaps. Have you tried to run the same 20 sprites prompt after selecting NB2Lite as model? That's what Gemini use for free users now.
