[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.
[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous Archived
 No.110111650
File: changover.jpg (867 KB, 2880x2880)
867 KB JPG
 No.110111650 Archived
is anyone actually reading these academic papers on AI? are they any good or at least semi-relevant or they're just mindlessly churned out daily with no usecase or purpose?
>>
Anonymous
 No.110112354
 No.110112354
>>110111650
What's the gist? I've used loop engineering and it's actually pretty effective. Give my local agent a fixed goal, a set of objective criteria to measure against, and than tell it to keep going until it successfully meets that goal. Why do they say it's over?
>>
Anonymous
 No.110112376
 No.110112376
>>110111650
>is anyone actually reading these academic papers on AI?
no. they have the ai agents read them instead.
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.