Use case?
>>110113115to give ebussy more control over your computer
>>110113115transitioning
The use case is that of an operating system.
>>110113115For when you want you computer to do less
>>110113115Gnomes, obviously. Wow are you dumb.
>>110113115Linux that just works, assuming you're a GNOME user.
>>110113740Based.
>>110113115It's for developers or users that want to test the latest version of gnome
>>110113115Headless servers
>try to customize it in any way>ebussy shows up at your doorstep
>>110113115If I wanted an immutable GNOME system, I don't see why I wouldn't just use Bluefin or something.
To provide a standardized test environment for making gnome programs
>>110113740
>>110113941Gnome users don't use Gnome. They use apple.
>>110113115It's for Jews
>>110114681Gnome really is Poundland's MacOS.
>>110114681But apple doesn't have spinnan cubezz
GNU/Linux/Systemd/GNOME
>>110114411fpbp
>>110113115can i install xfce on it
>>110115899No. Gnome OS is closed-source.
>>110113115Because why wouldn't you make a reference implementation now that the infrastructure (systemd, flatpak) is in place.
>>110113115to sell redhat cloud services as the only way to tie your devices together
>>110113115Amberol better come preinstalled
>>110119552>can't re-arrange music in the playlist>can't play mp4 or webm>closing the window minimizes the app instead of quitting it, songs continue to playThis is literally useless. Why are incompetent retards trying to reinvent the wheel and end up making a worse Audacious? Music players are a solved issue, there's no need for more of them.Not to mention the whole "closing the window doesn't kill the app" thing. Isn't that a problem in GNOME since they're against the system tray (where this music player would go when the window closes) and they're against minimizing/closing windows? It looks like GNOME devs and designers have no idea what they want.
>>110113115I want to know if this is actually daily driveable
>>110120509>Playing webm in a music playerWhat the actual fuck is wrong with you
>>110120509>Not to mention the whole "closing the window doesn't kill the app" thing. Isn't that a problem in GNOMEOnce again it's Gnome larping as MacOS.
>>110113115its actually an amazing distro and I expect ublue/bazzite/bluefin to move to the same tech>buildstream based (declarative yaml)>shared source with flatpak runtimes>each user's home folder is encrypted with their password>wip flatpak-based cli tool layering for developing, getting rid of shitty version managers for languages>tpm encryptionkde linux is already moving towards that too, getting rid of their arch base
>>110120509>>can't re-arrange music in the playlistsandboxing doesnt allow for playlists since they can point to files a sandbox cant access. Flatpak portal devs are bikeshedding it atm>>can't play mp4 or webmyou guys are retarded>>closing the window minimizes the app instead of quitting it, songs continue to playturn "background play" off? it literally has a checkbox in the menu are you blind>t. maintains another music player
>>110121024Yes, some songs and soundtracks I have are in a webm format. That's what's sometimes downloaded by ytdl or whatever backend is used by my YouTube apps. Same with mp4. I'm not autistic enough to convert everything to mp3 or whatever freetard format is the current standard. Webm and mp4 work in any music player I've ever used with no issue whatsoever.>>110121594>sandboxing doesnt allow for playlistsWhat are you even talking about? Why would "sandboxing" be an issue when trying to manage the order in which songs are being played in the currently running playlist? It works fine in Audacious which is also installed as a Flatpak on my system.I'm not talking about a "playlist" as a file which points to individual tracks. I'm talking about the list of currently playing songs, that is clearly marked as "Playlist" by this GNOME app, which does not (for whatever reason) allow me to drag songs around to control the playback order. I can't open 10 songs and manually choose in which order they play, it's randomly decided by the app itself. This is the basic behavior I'd expect in any music player. Even vibecoded Android apps have this feature.>it literally has a checkbox in the menuWell it's a shit default then. Of course I haven't explored the settings of a music player that DOESN'T EVEN PLAY half the media formats and can't even control the order of track playback.
>>110122068>I can't open 10 songs and manually choose in which order they play, it's randomly decided by the app itself.LOL Gnome is a joke
>>110113115If you're socialist or trans
>>110113115Is it as bad as most loonix systems are? What is different there, honestly?
>>110120509>Isn't that a problem in GNOME since they're against the system tray (where this music player would go when the window closes)Things like background music go in the notification/calendar menu if you "close" the program. You can toggle this on and off for any program that does it, it's usually the first or second option in the menu. You can also see a list of running background apps in the top right menu where all of the things like volume control is kept. The only real gap with GNOME is if a program expects system tray icons like Steam. That needs an extension to interact with the menu or it kind of gets lost in limbo land. GNOME also doesn't let you control volume per app without an extension.Anyway you could always just install Audacious. It's what I use. When I was on KDE I installed Strawberry. Who the fuck uses any of these default apps anyways?
>>110124396>Who the fuck uses any of these default apps anyways?This. Some are good, others are useless. The benefit of GNOME is good defaults/workflow/theme without having to do any configuration. Yes you might need some extensions, but this is still preferable to dealing with the clusterfuck that is KDE.
>>110113740>swapping/enabling new options on default workflows because muh UXyeah, gnome lost the plot a long time ago
What is this? I never heard that.I don't like GNOME kek, I definitely won't use this.If I want to use GNOME, I just switch to Ubuntu.
>>110114681As a GNOME user (just 1 days) I can agree this.
