Retard hereTheoretically could something like Universal Modder continuously upgrade itself with user input? Say you have a session and at the end you ask if for a report of the session, what worked, what didn't, etc and from that report you can decide where it can improve? Does that make sense or am I dumb?
>>110126688I mean you still require human input and review, if you're saying if it can report on itself and what it messed up completely autonomously then no.
>>110126688No. Now run along, buy some rope, and find a high crossbeam
>>110126688If the AI just does everything including the decisions of what to build next, then it is in the future hypothetically possible to do, however because of how AI creativity works in fields with no right or wrong answer it will just produce the most mean average generic output out there and keep repeating itself, kind of like how if you ask AI now to edit image to look like a goblin, it will give you pretty much the same one or few designs with minor differences. It is generic by default and by removing human input it will stay generic by default.
