is it possible to build a such predictive surveillance technology in 2026 or is it still science fiction?
Still sci fi
Everyone who reads this is gay
>>110155430do you make this lie?
It's possible
>>110155384But you’re being watched in corporate America.
>>110155859this image made me hurt my neck leaning down to kiss the monitor
>>110155337There's more than enough data to build what's in the show. The difficulty is accumulating, normalizing, and structuring all of that data into something useful.
>>110156261>>110155780Saar
>>110155337Yes, maybe not as efficient.
look up precrime and predictive policing
>>110155337Nowhere near, they make a time travel joke in an early episode for a reason.
>>110155337it's been here for a while nowyou're just fighting the first alpha wave with those Flock cameras
>>110156954> a time travel joke in an early episodeI do not remember a time travel joke in an early episode of “Person of Interest”.I have asked GPT-6 Luna to find it, but Luna cannot.Could you have been affected by a personal version of Mandela effect?
>>110156261You're the scum of the earth
>>110157877The joke was that they were going to travel back in time to remove the joke.
>>110155337Yes actually.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lz9mVZQ1Gsohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JjRyHgF8hx8
>>110157089The variations on the intro for this show are kino.
This series turned to shit because of this character.
>>110157089>>110156277This show knew way too much
>>110158343was this the guy's wife? I vaguely remember there being some sort of (sub)plot about his (ex?)wife. But maybe I'm confusing shows.
>>110158343She is what made the show watchable after the death of carter
>>110155337It already exists, it is just used for different things than the scifi show depicted it to be. Sure, it could have been built for terrorism or safety of the state to monitor moods and motions of masses but essentially its mechanisms are nothing more than a psyop tool for individuals that as a whole control the whole society. Whenever "the algorithm" of a social media gives you a "wink" you can see it in action. The algorithm understands you on a deeper level than anyone ever will, even yourself. It has statistical probability for your mental illnesses, current moods, past experiences and future behaviors. It can elicit and invoke behavior from you to such accuracy that it can "predict" what you are thinking about to suggest you that video, just to confirm its thesis through the biometric signature of your hesitation of median scroll. That hesitation it detects as emotional reaction (something akin the blade runner 2049 baseline replicant test). The "wink" is there just to make you not go away, to keep you engaged and interested in "the game". The more you play it the more information you give it and it becomes better at predicting your next move.Taking all these individual psychological operations into the whole this gives you a sense of what it was built to do. Not only to sway public opinion, political and cultural undercurrents but to economically have strings in multiple different industries without direct underpinning. Every single person becomes an unwitting spy, crisis actor or even terrorist if need arises it. And all you have to do is push that already mentally ill schizophrenic person to a brink of breaking with algorithmic feed of content and then ensure they are in a good enough place at good enough time to enact your desired outcome. Multiply this to few thousand tests a day and you get enough of a good predictive model to force people into traffic or criminal activity.
>>110158343ruh roh
>>110156277>The difficulty is accumulating, normalizing, and structuring all of that data into something useful.It's called "Sentient"
>>110159145>wall of tripfag textFiltered.
>>110159371>I have to tell you thatCall your mom she misses you
>>110157877It does exist, many thought the final episode was a way to warn him of the consequences. ChatGPT doesn’t have it because all episodes were never written in CC thus it can never know anything related to episodic events in television.
>you see Mr. Reese, the machine is always inevitable, its existence is decided by the human desire for power
>>110156954>>110157877>>110159559Are you talking about the episode where The Machine runs through a bunch of simulations (can't spoil the rest but it replays the same scene like a that Liam Neeson jumpcut meme)
>>110158858No, she's an elite hacker who was able to get root access on an Apple II so she could cheat at Oregon Trail.
>>110159319
>>110160182If-Then-ElseThat episode used to have the highest ranking of anything on IMDB but over the years has fallen from a 9.9 to a 9.8. Such a shame.
>>110160246>deranged code-trannie hating beautiful latina
>>110160182No, much earlier. Just an idle comment when Reese tries to ask"I've breached the space-time continuum"
>>110155859There's a significant difference in how the machine in the show works compared to modern day AI surveillance. The main one being that the machine acts as a true black box in the sense that all the data it uses is collected solely by itself, and the government has zero access to any data they didn't already have, nor does the machine provide any information to the government aside from the SSN of someone involved in the situation. No records, no evidence, no context. The government had to figure out for themselves why and how that person is involved with what. It's the only reason why anyone could argue how the machine was surveilling was legal, because technically no human person is involved in the surveillance process or has access to the surveillance data. The CIA hated that they had to rely on "trust me bro" for intel from an AI they owned but couldn't control and tried on multiple occasions to access all that gooey data the machine locks up, but begrudgingly continued to rely on it because it was always right. In the modern day, the government is the one doing all the surveilling and they have full access to all the data. They're fully involved in the surveillance process, and the AI tells them everything they need to know.
>>110164168Just like the show, the government built one themselves.
>>110164615The government didn't build anything in the show, they bought Research from IFT and "leased" access to Samaritan
based show lore droppers, thank you for your service
>>110155337It already exists: Palantir's SI.
>>110155337Shits getting pretty dystopian
>>110155337Is there any reason why XGBoost with a decent dataset couldn't be used as a precrime classifier? It doesn't seem like a difficult task to accomplish these days
>>110164615As >>110164673 pointed out, they didn't. But also, in real life they didn't build it either. Palantir, Flock and other businesses provide the software/AI that sorts through all the surveillance data the US government has and strings it all together into actionable intel.
>>110164168"the machine" from the programme is heavily anthropomorphised
>>110158343sex with coco puffs
