How would you even enforce this?
>>110206823>hand over mouth
>>110206823>trampling fantasy
>>110206823>Plastic fetish?
>>110206823Why not raise your country's IQ rather than banning things only retards do/think about?
>>110206823You don't, you just put it out there and let women use it against the men they don't like.
>>110206823>Face Sitting>BBW Facesitting>Jeans Face Sitting>Butt Drops
>>110206823daily electronics inspection open up you wanker
>>110206823>butt dropsGoycattle aren't allowed to even fantasize about relief from butthurt anymore. Lifespan-shortening stress is mandatory.
>>110206823this list is hilarious if you imagine it read in a british accent
>>110207253>retardsDo-ho-ho... You've clearly never been to a kink event
Hey UK-bros. Seriously, you guys okay? You're making even the Germans give you side eye lately. Plus, we tend to be downstream of you guys in policing/surveillance policy.
>>110207517jej
>>110207264You'll land in gaol.
>>110206823face sitting is the only weird one here. everything else on this list should indeed be banned.
what's "throat busting"?
>>110206823i like that they had to have meetings and research about these
>>110206823unironically what is left to have?keep in mind this is the second(?) wave of "nuh uh you can't have these fetishes" ban (first one included incest and age play among others iirc)
>>110206823imo face sitting enthusiasts won with this move because by turning it into a forbidden thing that will make it become like a magnet for transgressive young people vnr
>>110207253Because we are in the process of reducing the average IQ of western European countries.
>>110206823That's not even the full list and since a crime involves possesssion (and maybe the simple act of viewing?) i don't think they're planning to enforce it. It'd require a bigger police state than communist countries.
>>110206823Oi! U got a loicense for that erotica m8!?
>>110210051They never do
>>110207517It is even better if you imagine it being read in some Blackadder episode
>>110206823It's a bullshit Orwellian law that allows them to do two things:>Increase the power of the police state and allow them to develop technology and permissions to invade the privacy of everyone for no real reason.>Since literally every male watches porn, it is a law that can be used on any male they want to get rid of but can not find any actual crime to charge them with. Police already have the powers to seize your phone and computers and can imprison you if you don't surrender your password. If they find nothing incriminating on real crimes but see porn in your browser history, you're fucked. It is truly a terrible law and nobody in the country gives a shit, worse, there are some people even celebrating it, especially women.
Why? Most of this stuff seems rather harmless?
>>110209798>he's never busted throatsPathetic.
>>110206823They are working on it.
>>110210340Something something about breath control being potentially dangerous and cause suffecation
>>110206823why do they do this instead of hunting down and executing spam-callers and email-scammers?
>>110206823I'm supposed to be upset about vile degenerates getting slightly impeded in their sick indulgence?
>>110206823Semprini!
>>110210842>let's invade India again
>>110206823>BBW facesitting is now illegal in the UKAMERICA FUCK YEAH
>>110206823>UKfake newshttps://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2026/20/section/104>Pornographic images of strangulation or suffocation: England and Wales and Northern Irelandno Scotland, so not UK
>>110210041How do you enforce banning CP? Block everyone who hosts it and slap huge fines on anyone found posessing it.I wonder if they'll start forcing companies to check for hashes of known images of it, for example. Even retroactively.
>>110211199*possessing. Damn it.>>110210938Not even 10% of the UK lives in Scotland, and I don't expect the SNP to go full "You may take our lives, but you will NEVER take our facesitting porn!"
>>110209798going to assume pic related but idk for sure
The UK must be an amazing place, so safe that the police has time and resources to go after such inconsequential nonsense.
>>110207264same anon, same
>>110211808The peasants forgot the nobles own their lives just because they have inconsequential elections every once in a while
>>110207540Daily reminder that Britain is fucking MONARCHY WITHOUT CONSTITUTION>>110209923>(first one included incest and age play among others iirc)Isn't it already banned?
>>110207517i need a vocaroo RIGHT NOW
>>110207517Kek
>>110207517https://anonfilesnew.com/s/ryoFp7jwryB
>>110211199Every country and site works to stop CP and track down anything associated with it. Going after vanilla categories that are legal in most places and consumed by billions all over the world and hosted on every site is a completely different task.
>>110206823>motorboating a pair of hefty tits is illegal in the UK
>>110206823It has been a British politician's wet dream for years now: complete surveillance and control of every citizen from the moment they are born until they die. They orgasm at the thought of every Briton living in fear and oppression. This is merely a stepping stone to more state power for their "utopian" police state. And what better than a porn law, with it you could easily arrest every native male in Britain and throw them into workhouses for the rest of their lives, working to pay for the great welfare state for women and immigrants.
>>110209923>unironically what is left to have?BBC interracial, cuckoldry, gay sex. Everything the modern male could want.
>>110206823Hell is living in the UK
>>110206823retard the goal is raids. home to home, house to house raids
>>110212039with royal palace music playing in the background
>>110206823You laugh, but my father died being smothered by feet
>>110206823in uk they just revoke your loicense, yes?
only terrorists and rapists watch... <checks notes>... facesitting porn
>>110206823*Does not apply to Muslims or refugees
>>110206823I want to hear King Charles pronouncing "throat busting fantasy"
>>110207517>>110212039>>110215046someone else can add the musichttps://vocaroo.com/1dULwSFKBJ2o
>>110210013It's so fucking obvious, been obvious for the last 2 decades.
>Breast smotherSo touching a boobie is a terrible perversion?
>>110217840Sounds like the guy announcing train departure times at the metro
how will they decide if specific content breaks the law? Is there a job posting for porn reviewer?
>>110210559Blue board nigger.
>>110207206otherwise known as kpop
>>110217840was expecting a more britbong accent
>>110218702>i expect people in the UK to sound like my HECCIN saturday morning cartoon villains! my comfortkino!
>>110220460yes retard yuropoor, that was the point
Banning poop-related fetishes is the first step toward culling homosexuals so I'm conflicted on this one.
>>110210179>BREAST smothering>hugh laurey drops his monocle
>>110206823>>110207264>>110211833>>110217665>>110218019I've been asking everywhere, what is the reason for banning fetishes like:>ass smothering>breast smothering>facesitting>jeans facesitting>Butt drops>Chest sitting>scissorholdDo they honestly believe the porn in these categories is something men to do women and not the other way around? Do they honestly think people die from ass smothering??? Aren't they demoralizing the same men who actually approve of this shit?>>110220518>poop-related fetishesI don't see any of those. And shouldn't they be pro homosexuals anyway?
>>110220518if you think this'll affect fag sites i've got some prime real estate over the thames to sell you
>>110220551>ass smothering>face sitting>not feces relatedOk scat guy.
>>110220551I haven't looked too much into it, but I assume it's something like this:>new law gets worded weird and/or too broadly (inevitably) >instead of just banning asphyxiation related fetishes it bans a ton of other stuff as well>nothing ever happens anyway
I didn't know that face sitting was considered something violent.
>>110206823I'm a degenerate faggot and I don't even know what some of these are. This will just introduce more people to fetishes kek
>>110220571Yes not feces related, clearly you've never watched the categories in question. Just because .1% of the content involves scat doesn't mean the fetish does. That's like saying the 5% is the content that is men sitting on women is why the category should be banned, although even worse. But maybe the UK is thinking in similar lines as you. Still odd, I thought they were going to ban abuse/non-consent/misogynistic fetishes. I'm sure there are some beta simp British men who must be upset at the bait and switch.
>>110206823https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-30454773Apparently they did the same thing in 2014, only now it affects the Internet as well. Back then it affected porn DVDs and other such nonsense. In any case, that list is extrapolated in a porn site announcement from what I've read, it's not an official government list.
>>110206823porn inspection day
>>110220615Mmm, put your asshole right on my face>not feces related
>>110221046>put your asshole right on my faceYes, most people are hygienic and don't have shit covering their buttcrack, and also most of that category is about putting pussy on your face and not really asshole.
>>110221046Does everything involving a penis automatically devolve into pissing?
>>110206823Who does it even criminalise, the producers or the gooners?They made in-line spitroasting illegal where guy A bangs girl directly into guy B's dick, so now spitroasts are always offset and/or not true spitroasts. Once you see it you can't unsee it.
>>110210938>no Scotland, so not UKwe gon' be flooded with English facesitters steaming over the border now.
>>110207253bbw facesitting is a high iq kink
>>110221125>Who does it even criminalise, the producers or the gooners?If it's illegal to post it then there can't be webs with that content in the UK and possession is if they find you have that content in your devices. So both the publishers and consumers.
>>110218653Trial by a well-hung jury.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cmpqgepejr2ro>Her independent review, commissioned by former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's government, cited an account of a 14-year-old boy asking a teacher how to choke girls during sex.If they can't stop minors watching porn, how exactly are they going to stop them from watching choking pornography?
>>110221197One autistic sperg ruins it for everyone.But also note the teacher had no common sense to never address the comment ever again, but instead escalates it like the *child* is some sort of proto-sexoffender.
>>110209798
>>110221197>Rishi Sunakok but what about in the uk?
>>110221197why the fuck is adult content being banned because of how it affects minors? it's already an offense to show porn to minors in the first place, is it not?
>>110221300Depends. You can put all the Crazy Town you want in front of children, even though that whore knows exactly what she is doing
>>110206823American here, we sided with the wrong Euros in WWII.
>>110206823I genuinely hate this country.Anyway, this basically an excuse to arrest national British people and hand the country to the arabs. They want to force an AI onto your phone that will spy on you and get you arrested for wrongthink, all in name of "saving the children".Whatever happened to bread and circuses? I don't know what they get out of making people miserable.
>>110222478just move to freedom landat least we haven't banned BBW facesitting (yet)
>>110222546>just move to a country that's basically impossible to just move to legally for a regular person
>>110221216Reminds me how Japanese erotic games are censored because a kid got caught stealing one in 1991.
>>110222546>just move to freedom landThat's easier said than done.>Just leave your friends and family behind, spend a shit ton of money on a flight and accommodation for facesitting porn, bro
>>110222587just use Tor like every other oppressive nation
>>110206823>throat bursting fantasy>buttdrops>trampling fantasynintendo is going to fuck them up
Could you do something like the Tiananmen square copypasta and post facesitting porn in a British server and it shuts the whole thing down?
>>110220493>yes retard yuropoor, that was the point
I'm pretty sure in OP's pic that's a list of specific videos being removed, and not a list of banned categories
>throat bursting fantasydoes that mean Alien vs Predator Requiem is now illegal in the UK?
>>110224685it literally says "specific categories" at the top
>>110224716Is this the hospital scenes?
>>110206823First they came for the Butt Drops, and I didn't say anything because I didn't want people to know I love Butt Drops
>>110221216>>110222579Funny how governments everywhere love punishing the majority for the actions of the minority.
>>110206823They can't. Prisons are so full they're contemplating letting rapists out early kek.https://www.theguardian.com/society/2026/jul/12/scrapping-early-release-sex-offenders-no-capacity-jails-england-wales-david-lammy
>>110206823What about porn where girls defecating over the cUKistan king?
>>110210938Common Scottish W
>throat busting fantasylook away britbongs
>>110222478>They want to force an AI onto your phone that will spy on you and get you arrested for wrongthink, all in name of "saving the children".What do you want to bet the politicians will make an exception for their own phones and the phones of their billionaire friends because of "privacy" and "privileges"?
>>110220551Anarcho tyranny and humiliation ritual. Since injustice is deliberately rampant, you use taxpayer money and the law to go for obscure "crimes" that weren't crimes before. You could just ban porn outright if you had moral grounds, but being selective proves it isn't about morality at all.
the fuck is a butt drop?
>>110212008They are a constitutional monarchy, retard.
>>110224755>it literally says "specific categories" at the topYes and underneath that it says, "affected content."This info is taken from a screenshot from a content creator's account, and it is telling them what videos are being removed. There's no category called, "Throatbusting fantasy."
>>110210013>Because we are in the process of reducing the average IQ of western European countries.no
>>110230995You're half right it seems. It is from a user account, but those are in fact the categories.
>>110231675Actually scratch that, you may still be right, it could just be worded weird.
>>110231687Final update: I went to the website and those are in fact the categories. Butt drops just look like regular face sitting to me, but maybe this matter requires further scientific investigation.
>>110231720Final final update: in some of the butt drops videos the women are actually running-jumping on the men butt first like some sort of weird wrestling move, so I guess the term is accurate.
>>110231720I think they "drop" from a height onto the face rather than politely sitting down.
>>110231774Yep. Also, for anyone curious, Throat Busting Fantasy refers to the sub getting pressure put on their throat apparently. Pic related made me audibly kek.
>>110210938It needs a separate section for Scot's Law https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2026/20/section/105
I'm tired bros. Now they want to police what kinks I'm allowed to have. Not in the UK but if other nannystate legislation is any indicator the rest of the western world is soon to follow.Now what's even the point in living in the west? >>110231751seems hot
>>110232063Just convert and rename yourself muhhamed, enjoy being in the priviliged class of doctors and engineers
>>110206823Selectively.
>>110206823What the fuck are they even doing
>>110233031>somewhere in Whitehall, a select band of elite Civil Servants animatedly discuss the correct technical description for 'nose in arse' p0rn
>>110206823simple as
>>110233141I think there should be a website that collects all these things. everybody needs a good laugh once in a while
>>110207253>Why not raise your country's IQYou answered your own question
>>110233159
>>110233141This is so absurd I had to read that a bunch of times to get the sentence. What is this agekeeping baking?
>>110233196yoofs
>ukDropped from interest. They made their cycle chair years ago.
>>110233244Invented Israel and the Internet!>ohno wait
>>110207206I though it was they were referring to see through body-contour clothing, but I'm starting to think its that shit where women are like vacuum bagged so they can't move then forcibly brought to orgasm using vibrators -- which I would like to emphasize is insane because I've only ever seen 1 vid with it and it was a JAV.Someone at the UK government is self reporting.
>>110233393tbf, if anyones 'Expert' in niche porn genres, UK civil service undoubtedly good starting point.
>>110218686>otherwise known as kpopDamn
>>110233141>HEDDLU>GOGLEDD CYMRUi was thinking that this is obviously ai until i realized this is the fucking welsh language
>>110206823I don’t see a single fetish on here that I’m indulging in or that I’d deem worth exploring, but how the hell is being retarded with what you’re beating your meat to relevant to the law?If you wanna have your populace being less retarded/less degenerate, you shouldn’t try fighting the symptoms but look at the cause. And how the hell do you even enforce this?>But officer, of course I’m aware that BBW-facesitting is illegal! Hence I’m indulging in BUW-facesitting. With an Ugly woman it’s not illegal anymore!>Oy, you’re right. That’s an ugly, not even certain if it is a woman, woman you got there M8, ‘av a jolly wank!
>>110207206>>110233393I think it is riding balloons or blow up pool toys. The stuff that shiny/fuckable Lola done which makes perfect sense for the UK gov since they all look very young. The vacuum bag thingy has a different name if I remember right and is more common in the west.
>>110233393>>110235723At least in the OP website's case, the see through thing seems to be correct.
Good start but if you think about it, regular vanilla sex is more risky and dangerous then>checks notesSitting on peoples faces. So I vote we add that to the list as well.
>>110236271Why can't people be happy with just bobs and vagene?
>>110237853 low IQ monkeys in Plato's cave need a new supply of shadows to drool at
>>110236271> fetish in which one is sexually aroused when a performer wraps parts or theirentire body in plastic.So essentially regular ass clothing, unless you go to saville row, since everything is plastic nowadays? Oh well.
>>110210938>the image portrays, in an explicit and realistic way, a person strangling or suffocating another person, and>a reasonable person looking at the image would think that the persons were real.They're not outlawing cartoon face sitting? Is this really Britain?
>>110220551>NOOOO DON'T RESTRICT MY DEGENERACY
>>110238560I'm not even necessarily an enjoyer of those fetishes. If they banned porn outright your argument would have made much more sense, but see >>110228124.
>>110238578Banning is shunned in today's society. Ever since WW2 elites have preferred soft power to rule over the masses. So even that which is irredeemable is 'corrected' not by locking the door, but by making the door way so small, that squeezing through it hurts and takes a long time. Also if you banned porn now the masses would go insane, we've been fed too many lies about porn being 'normal' and 'natural' that we can just be denied all access.
>>110238626Yes that all makes sense, but the particular fetishes they are banning for now don't, except for purposes of demoralization.
>>110238633Ultimately they are even too degenerate for our society. The elites still need to us to reproduce somewhat but if every lad over the pond blows his load to some girl sitting on his face he will not produce more serfs. You don't want to end up like Japan.
>>110238650kek I hope this is true, just imagine some old British boomer looking at facesitting porn and being confused it isn't explicitly geared toward reproduction
>>110238665Well some boomer probably, however the elites still need some serfs, so we are allowed to have some degeneracy but not too much. Ultimately, neither of us should fight for the preservation of any of these practices.
>>110238672Maybe, I don't think even outright banning porn will fix native British birth rates though, even if more reproduction was their goal.
>>110238685It will, but other generations. We have other short-term issues but those need short-term solutions.
>>110238633>Yes that all makes sense, but the particular fetishes they are banning for now don'tIt's like this:>Tate brothers accused of choking countless women>increasing number of people using the rough sex excuse to justify murder>let's ban choking in porn (already did it back in 2014 for DVDs)>(un)intended consequence: banning a ton of other vaguely related stuffI'm not saying it's a good thing, far from it, just that it's not rocket science unless you're conspiracybrained to begin with and can't or won't notice the obvious reasons.
>>110206823femdom bros... not like this
>>110238765>Won't they think of the tates
>>110238765That would make sense actually. I could see it at least
>>110235723The common theme of all these is generally asphyxiation so I don't think latex clothes or balloons or pool toys are likely impacted
>>110217840>>110212039Your wish is my command.https://vocaroo.com/1knOq9mERTNd
>>110207536this is only proving his point
