Previous Thread: >>110177065>Links:>GPT-Image 2/2.5https://chatgpt.com/https://designer.microsoft.com/image-creatorhttps://copilot.microsoft.com/>Nano Banana Pro/2.1https://gemini.google.com/apphttps://labs.google/fx/tools/flowhttps://aistudio.google.com/prompts/new_image>MAI-Imagehttps://www.bing.com/images/create>Midjourney [PAID]https://www.midjourney.com/home>Meta AI (Muse Spark):https://ai.meta.com/>NovelAI [PAID]https://novelai.net/image>Perchancehttps://perchance.org/ai-text-to-image-generator>AI videoshttps://pixverse.ai/https://hailuoai.video/>Prompt Generatorhttps://tipseason.com/dalle-prompt-generator>Image-to-Prompt (reverse engineer prompts)https://convly.ai/image-to-prompt/>DALL-E 3 image generation guidehttps://files.catbox.moe/o4yihf.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/320rm1.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/8gge6o.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/dcokjf.png>Perchance generator listhttps://pastebin.com/XRGqaW4W>Related Boards>>>/vg/vig>>>/co/dall-e>>>/trash/aibf>>>/aco/mmai>>>/tg/slop
The Royal Physician and Future Queen Tatiana needs to nap more!
luv big fake gpt booba
>>110224774is she brown larping as white, or white larping as brown underneath
>>110224947White as brown
>>110225247Which AI did you use? Whenever I ask ChatGPT to make an alteration like this while explicitly telling it to keep everything the same, it does some kind of weird uncanny redraw and an extra eyebrow or finger is added on top of the one minor edit I asked for.
>>110225250NB2.1 but it also kept changing the neck and arms, some variations of queen's mouth and removing the sweat drop and notice lines, which I didn't say to keep (I did say to keep the neck and arms unchanged). Told it to "reconstruct the image without quality loss", which is how the line art is resharpened as opposed to upscaling and keeping it as is. Manually removed the stray mark to left of the bottom dialogue line.
>>110225278>>110225286Thank you. Ah well, a magic bullet was wishful thinking.
>>110223773The Machine Spirit is almost always downbad
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hwg7NWXEoZIhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i99fdfaIXbo
Is MS designer the last remaining service that still lets you make a large number of decent quality images?
This one I made with chatgpt a while back, significantly better but costs money
>>110226456On my end, Designer is limited to 15 pictures per *month*. No idea if you have a Microsoft 365 subscription or something.>>110226483Designer should use the same gpt-image-2 model ChatGPT used to offer until September.
>>110226570very original, I liek
>>110226602Thanks. I thought Soviet cyberpunk was an interesting idea.
>>1102266655 years later the booba prompt still get some results
>>110226502Oh damn I thought that was a daily limit like it used to be. Good thing I can still switch accounts. Now that I look at it, it does seem to be the same generator, but chatgpt did produce much better variety, whereas designer will give you the exact same angle every time.
The other annoying this is the way this model always has that grainy effect that appears in every image and is very obvious once you notice it.
>>110227452Oh lawd thanks for inspiration!
>>110227463This one I made a few months back with chatgpt where I was able to get all sorts of interesting angles
>>110227481I'm more into public humiliation, and bdsm type slavery
>>110227535
>>110227060They've made Designer pretty much useless ages ago, I think it still used to have de3 back then. The nearly unlimited models nowadays should be NB2.1 via Flow and MAI via BIC (albeit the latter is pretty much used here only by the anon who likes Asian girls)I've not noticed the issue with the angle myself, I mostly make posters/infographics with gpt-image-2/2.5, but Microsoft's initial implementation of 4o in Copilot, before they switched to the silly/useless mini model, was extremely samey/pseudo-deterministic, maybe they like that. Designer seems to introduce more variety from that point of view, at least.
Is Sunburst usable for free?
>>110227898Thank you
more old chatgpt stuff
>>110227767At the moment, it's available again on Arena, I noticed it yesterday, but I forgot to mention it. Mind you, on Arena you have to fight against *their* textual blocks/filters, too. So I'm not sure if it helps and I have no idea for how long it will stay available, they made it available immediately after the launch of the model, but it lasted just some time, I have no idea since when they made it available again, I don't check arena often nowadays.
>>110228008Yes I knew about that one and it can only be used for small normie jobs. I personally use Flare generating in 4K ෆ.̮ෆ
trying out NB
>>110228022>I personally use Flare generating in 4K ෆ.̮ෆThrough API or some 3rd party service? The interesting thing about Arena, now that I check it again, is that they've removed all the other OAI models, they don't even offer Flare.
>>110228196A third party service that I'm exploiting (ㆁωㆁ)
almost there...
>>110228132you need to take this scenario further, or better yet give me the prompt so I can make it real dirty on my rig
>>110228450>35mm 90s drama movie scene. Long distance telephoto lens shot from a low angle view. Set on a quiet residential street in the upper west side of new york city at dusk, a young nervous Korean woman who looks like the first attached image, kneels patiently. She is exhausted and perspiring. She is wearing a fashionable leather collar with a strap attached to it. Next to her stands a tall blonde woman who looks like the second attached image, she is holding the strap arrogantly. She reaches over to helpfully holds the korean girl's cheeks, who in turn looks back with uncertainty. In the background, a couple of asians observe them with curiosity. Frame it like a still from a dramatic scene in a movie
>>110228450got the asian woman references from here: >>>/hr/5298007
>>110228511dayum you have a way with words
trying to close the gap between the mouth and foot...
>>110228450I tried to take it further but the results just werent any good.
>>110228196tell me about the moon wolfie fren, t. ur leftist penpal fren
>>110228511It doesn't copy my face for the girl well, it really just makes her look generic Korean. Also I think I'm not into this scenario, actually.
>>110229102Well yeah they need to be wearing latex fetish clothes for the scenario to really werk lol
>>110229102Pretty good, the expressions of the people in the background are hilarious.
>>110229137the casual setting is what makes it appealing. I never understood fetish clothes myself, they just look stupid. A normal looking woman wearing a collar and leash is far hotter than one dressed up like a circus freak.
>>110229354I used qwen-image-3-pro>>110229102Not *my* face, but the face from the character sheet.
>>110229102the original gen is better
>>110229367Houston we have contact
>>110229543Can you put white viscous fluid on her foot she's licking off of?
>>110224767>>110224774Why do I find this concept of Makima Catrina so fitting?
generally fluids will only add more tripwires for the content moderation. This is one I generated a while back and added the fluids myself. Was time consuming though.
>>110229009No red moon until 2028, that doesn't bode well... Jokes aside, I've been thinking about the eternal return lately. 2 years ago I was thinking about Proposal 127 in Colorado. Now I'm thinking about Amendment 83 in Colorado. It's almost funny.
NovelAi v5 making stuff like this w/o even a dall-e 3 vibe transfer. I think I've found my new waste of time.
>>110229735
>>110230641
>>110230649
>>110230371impressive, but hardly holds a candle to the chaos that is dalle soulalso if you're not making bla*ked or cute and funny content with premium novelAI you're paying for nothing
>>110230968Of course it's not as good, it's better than nothing though.
I spent the last hour trying out a bunch of different models including the chinese ones and and they're all ass. GPT is so far ahead of the game it's not even funny.
>>110231627Isn't anatomy fucked up? Something weird with her legs. GPT often does this.
>>110232064Agreed. I wonder if it's just the aesthetics that appeal to people. gpt-image-2 was actually better, in my opinion. 2.5 is very often quite obviously anatomically arguable.
It's no longer Halloween, so this is for real (yeah, this is how Yahna's hair looks like when it's fully let down in the official Unicorn Overlord art book).This came out well. Not perfect since it refused to use the old Yahna design I gave it in the prompt, but still, it came out well.
>>110232064Yes the leg is positioned oddly, but don't all models do this?
Incidentally, this is one of the two elder Yahna designs ChatGPT made, so I was hoping it would use it for the comic. Admittedly, she doesn't quite look 88, but you can blame that on magic or anime or this being what people remember her looking like before she retired from being the court magician.
>>110229102Guy makes big promises and completely fails to deliver. Story as old as time.
>>110230063 >straps not connected to the shoesslop
Reprompted a request from over a year ago. Its amazing how much ChatGPT has improved.[spoiler]Also, watch Charlie the Unicorn: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKd_2vqPrmU for context[/spoiler]
>>>/wsg/6263842
Getting this annoying grainy effect again. Anyone know what causes it and why they can't fix it?
using gpt for generation and qwen for adjustments
>>110235773>>110235785All the new OpenAI models have that awful look to them.
>>110235773>why they can't fix it?Because they both asshoe and dumbass. Some speculate it's part of the watermark (in which case it would be nicer if they stored the original output in their chat when iterating) but in part the model is also cooked in gutter oil.
>>110236002They use the same invisible SynthID watermark introduced by Google, I doubt it's really a watermark, unless one means that in the sense of smearing stuff above a picture to make it look like AI...
I know we are all hyperfocused autists, but do we really have to post the same stuff over and over?
>>110236877
>>110236877>weIt's one anon doing it, and it's not the one with animals (there is proportionately much less of them in this thread).
>>110237365
Anime is cringe.
>>110237715I misread the post while I was getting dinner fixed, my bad. And I forgot to attach the picture when I deleted it and reposted it. Feeling really a bit down these days.>>110237741noimging in an image generation thread is more cringe. Show us what (You) like at least, anon.
>>110236877Everyone that isn't a hyperfocused autist left years ago.
>>110229985one thing is certain, the perfect shitstorm at the perfect time, way too perfect on the time 2bh, I call shenanigansabout the rest, they usually kill for quotes sports end quotes, and it shows in their every day lifeI'm not saying it has to be that way, but it certainly is in some casesI knew they come with dirty gri ks but this was unheard of
>>110238061*dirty tricks
Anyone's got a picture of that dog that kept appearing when DALL-E 3 blocked all images? And perhaps that pufferfish?
>>110238520Here's the dog, I'll try to find the pufferfish, anon.
>>110238061Well, Colorado sits at the perfect junction because of its "liberal", urbanised, majority and a rural side of the country that is not very different from the Rocky Mountains. They had the (barely) successful 2020 referendum to reintroduce wolves, for instance, before those two, back-on-back, referenda. The frenzy with constitutional protection of hunting is actually a sign of nervousness, they know that they're losing ground, even in America hunters are declining, not in absolute numbers, but as a proportion of the population, and they're trying to make any kind of stricter regulation/abolition of practices that most people dislike and have no actual, scientific, justification/need, like predator hunting, harder, by putting a very generic right to hunt in the constitution. That would also make the alternatives, like hazing, guardian dogs, etc. more difficult to implement, in terms of getting support from the government, because hunting would remain the tool of choice, by constitutional design. And, obviously, it creates issues with the wildlife agency, Colorado Parks and Wildlife in this case, having a vested interested in maintaining the current system and politicising themselves, they seem to have done that in the previous referendum, too (this is a point raised by a rare hunter *opposing* the amendment, intriguingly). The problem, overall, is reforming the North American Model of Conservation itself.
