You don't need more, you are just trained consumer cattle
>below 144hzget away from me unwashed thirdie
>>110226760>more than 2x compute power for diminishing returnspiss off Jensen
>>110226760thisthere's no going back
>>110226742>not 4kask me how I know you dont do any actual work, and desktop real estate doesnt matter to you.
>>110226742viewsonic is cheap shit and dies after 18 months. stop being a jeet
>>1102268812x27 beats 1x32 any and every time
>>110226742>calls out people for being drones doing what they're told>then proceeds to tell people what they need and what they do not needyou're one stupid cunt, aren't you? are you even tying?
>>110226760gaymer begone, higher refresh rate only makes sense on smartphones because it allows for accurate touch and smoother doomscrolling.
>>110226742this is how you get shortchanged with 59hz
>>110226742>60Hzstahp
>>110226742>I only need 27 inchesunlike you're mom
>>110226889>Dont by overpriced shit that will tax your perpetually more expensive hardware just cause>literal sweetspot performance price rig cost wisewhy is everyone intentionally missreding?fell for jewherz meme?fell for 4k for anything but 50+ inch TVs?your fault
>>110226898Most devices run the input controller separately from display refresh tho. It's how you have have like 300mhz polling speeds but still display 60FPS
>>110227047It still doesnt matter if you just accept screen tearingOn 300fps you would just have 5 barely visible horizontal lines on 60hz monitorInput lag of 3.3ms is same like on 300hz monitor
>>110226742Photography (and therefore editing) is my main hobby, having a 4K monitor is extremely helpful. I don't give a fuck about the refresh rate however
>>110227084One usecase of high DPI99% of people dont need that shit
>>110227084Anything lower than 90hz is a slideshow.
>>110227093Everything is 60fpsMovies are 24fpsAnd you need 144hz cause you mouse is not buttery smoothFucking zoomers man...
>>110227089There are many other professional applications where it's quite useful, typically when you need to have both editing and visualization displayed at the same time (coding, numerical simulations, plotting stuff, video editing, etc)
>>110227101>Everything is 60fpsnot anymore unc>Movies are 24fpsyeah and what year was that standard made
>>110227105I would even go as far as affirming that 3 simultaneously visible workspaces is optimal: input (file explorer), work/main task (eg coding), output.Then virtual desktops are also very useful for background or miscellaneous tasks (music player, web browsing, emails)
>>110226742No, 4K and with a high DPI is well worth the investment but you can enjoy living in 2010 if you prefer.
>>110226742>buys ViewSonic>calls others consumer cattle
>>110226742Im still waiting on a 3:2 high refresh rate monitor
>>110226742make it 75hz and we're talking
>>110226760Stop playing games and grow up
>>110226742I can't hear you from my 5k 27" panel.
>>110227116 zoomtard luddite
>>110226851>I don't play gamesthen you need to upgrade to 4K or you didn't need to upgrade from 1080p>I'm not good enough at games to need more than 60fpsis what you meant
>>110226851>>110226898>>110227313You need 144hz for even looking at a monitor these days. I cannot go back to 60hz. And you're not adding any extra resource burden when you're not actually doing anything resource intensive. Everything just looks better. Buying lower refresh rates is clearing out an abandoned Chinese warehouse.
>>110227365>144Hz>you're not adding any extra resource burden when you're not actually doing anything resource intensiveMight you have tried running a 144Hz monitor on a legacy system? If so, do you recall how desktop performance was?
