Guys AI is profitable if we don't look at the costs
>>110271761What're the costs anon?
>>110271770suing haters
>>110271770numbers so large your froggy brain cant comprehend
AI is profitable just not to the extent it's funded by taxes, like most other tax funded entities
>>110271887Subsidies flow back into the government through taxes.
>>110271761Anon you are still gonna be replaced
>>110274961common cope for never having been of any worth to begin with2mw btw
>>110271761Localchads win again
>>110274974Unfortunately for both of us, no matter how much you cope, tech workers are gonna be replaced for the most part. You have to be delusional to think this is not coming. I'm thinking about becoming a nurse or some shit.
>>110271770The end of free thought and will.
>>110275008>for the most partIT janitors.codemonkeys.the unskilled workers of the programming world.engineering will be the last job standing from all of them.civil engineering, r&d, swe, ee, mechbois, etc>muh nurserowboats. theres nothing that couldnt be automated about being a nursealso its a thankless, hard, disgusting jobyou will be attending to the bedsores of alzheimier patientsyou will be removing the pus of gunshot wounds by the means of shoving a gauze in the holeits robotics or bust.you will be let to starve in the next 20 years otherwise
>>110275050>civil engineering, r&d, swe, ee, mechbois, etccivil, mechanical etc are probably safe; ee and especially swe are not. Even prominent copers are starting to capitulate.>rowboats. theres nothing that couldnt be automated about being a nurseIn principle you are right, but if it gets automated, then 99% of ALL workers will be automated away, so in that case I wouldn't really give a shit.
>>110275088>prominent coperslolle. so youre getting your news from reddit.if you wanna get actual news, open your ears for ai-lmaoo starting to beat canonical implementations of stufflike eisel-lemirewere pretty far off though, the shatbots cant even optimize the more normal stuff, and not even to the degree of becoming an exemplary implementation, but to the level of decencyand, yeah, when you take your information from reddit, youre guaranteed to be wrong and sound retarded while youre at it.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZoS1tr8Cik
>>110271761That's not what "profitable" means.
>>110274988Good luck buying more hardware once your current craps out.
>>110271761costs are not important if they can be externalized
>>110271770Dont know. Theyred redacted in the S-1. Guess that means theyre not important. Cuz its the law and stuff.
>>110271761You realize that if it weren’t profitable, compute and hardware would become cheaper until the point that it IS profitable, right? And that all the AI companies would eventually just increase prices as people are too addicted to AI? And that, even if they weren’t profiting that much, they would still spend tens of billions every year making better models? And that the government would fund all of this regardless for cyber hacking and other important purposes? And that hardware will continue to get better?You know AI is already speeding up its own training, right? And they’re now able to spend much more money doing so? What do you think the result of all this will be? Even 5 years from now?
>>110271761SI is profitable even considering the costs—projections.
>>110272767>money flows back into politicians no matter what happensyeah we know
where is our FUNNY GUY, mr. JD PENCE, sorry sorry VANCE?did he find any CORRUPTION in those AI/SI deals in Texas? like those dumocrat conspiracy with Guddites?
>>110271770From my recent dealings with OpenAI, two goats, 3 bags of grain, a pig, and if youre bad at haggling, a good plow.
