[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1794134508662.png (77 KB, 817x216)
77 KB PNG
Does GNU have the right approach here?
Should FOSS projects accept contributions made from slavery?
>>
>>110272620
already how it works in Japan
>>
File: OIP-1037533336.jpg (28 KB, 474x320)
28 KB JPG
On one hand, it would be extremely based.
On the other hand, those slaves would probably be jeets, and nobody wants jeet code, so...
>>
I assume this is just a retarded argument against ai that falls apart the moment you point out llms arent humans
>>
>>110272620
Sure but US courts have ruled the output of LLMs isn't copyrightable, even by humans. So this analogy isn't exactly right.
>>
>>110272712
Yes technically something needs human authorship for it to be eligible for copyright, but what constitutes authorship is incredibly broad.
>>
>>110272620
Proprietary software is slavery. I think you are conflating the term "slavery".
>>
>>110272620
From GNU's point of view of course the answer must be YES:
>Does the code solve a problem? Yes???
>Is it correct and working? Yes??
>Then we must accept it

Why on earth would they reject perfectly good code on moral grounds?
This is why everyone hates extreme leftists. You would rather watch the world burn because slavery is immoral and anything good coming out of it is therefore immoral, therefore should a product of slavery be of good excellence and have the potential to improve anything you must automatically throw it away and say no, you will not take that.
>>
>>110272620
Indubitably. Politics has no place in productive work. It's entertainment for the lowest rungs of society, just a clown show. Thus, so long as the work is done in compliance with the law and respecting good technical processes, this is the only correct approach.
And yes, I realize that "slavery" here means AI. The problem is that the AI will slop you wholesale-stolen proprietary-code, for example, and of extremely low quality. And absolutely nobody who uses AI, despite claiming otherwise, ever checks the code before hitting send.
>>
>>110272639
They are talking about LLMs.
>>
>>110273918
Replace jeet with AI and... oh, perfect match!
>>
File: 71se9k.jpg (68 KB, 584x427)
68 KB JPG
>>110272620
it's just FOSS version of would you buy a pair of Nike if you knew 10 children in Bangladesh died making them in a sweatshop.
>>
File: ebussy.jpg (19 KB, 300x300)
19 KB JPG
>>110272620
use case for emancipation?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.