[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_2689.jpg (117 KB, 750x700)
117 KB JPG
Why does ai struggle to come up with novel hypotheses compared to humans Yet it still has some ability to do so?
>>
>>110273163
(The only valid question) Sex with robots, when ?
>>
>>110273177
Now, if your standards are low enough and you're OK with a creepy uncanny valley latex sex doll stretched over a few servos.
Alita-tier robots are still aways off it would seem.
>>
>>110273163
there may well be robots who can build houses, as i have seen videos of them in action. but the world is too large for robot housebuilding to be a major global disruptor to the housing market.
it migth take over whatever houses are allowed to be built in rich parts of the west coast of america but there aren't going to be housebuilding robots in latvia and kenya and chile and portugal and so on. all these things will be possible and will exist but the scale of adoption is nonsensically over-exaggerated.
china has adopted automated cotton picking which isn't difficult because a truck drives up and down in straight lines on non-difficult terrain. japan hasn't adopted automated rice planting because a person still needs to control how the rice planter tractor drives through the muddy water. tractors can be auto-driven by computers and do a lot of farm work but the farmer doesn't want to let go of it.
>>
>>110273361
>but there aren't going to be housebuilding robots in latvia and kenya and chile and portugal and so on
Why not? What's stopping them?
>>
>>110273163
adding this old retard to the obituaries i'm looking forwards to.
>>
>>110273163
AI is a language model. You think first and then use language second.
>>
>>110273361
>person still needs to control how the rice planter tractor drives through the muddy water.
why do you think a computer cannot do this
>>
>>110273625
This, this is literally the one thing computers have been able to do for a few decades. The other part of this is there's no need to keep the same farm layout: you can change it to accommodate the fact you will be using robotized tractors.
>>
>>110273420
Too bad. He will become biologically immortal and take his place in the permanent owner class.
>>
>>110273192
No, i want protein based skin material and aelf fabrication
>>
LLMs are evolutionary models trained to converge based on a test set, it's "physical fitness" is compared to the test set which is largely reddit posts.
>>
>>110273951
All wrong.
>>
>>110273951
That’s an interesting concept. The idea of the more retarded the model is, the better it is, since it’s more human like
>>
>WE HAVE ROBOTS THAT CAN DO ALL THIS STUFF

Cool! So where are they at?
>>
>>110274603
>we will
>>
>>110273192
>you're OK with a creepy uncanny valley latex sex doll
YES!
>>110273951
>LLMs are evolutionary models
Evolutionary models don't require assload of training data.
>>
>>110273163
>Yet it still has some ability to do so?
it has no ability of abductive reasoning so it literally can't come up anything that's out of distribution of the training set but there are still combinations within that distribution that were either never tried or forgotten, so it sometimes brute-forces those
>>
>>110274603
We have lots of robots that can do lots of stuff but they're economically completely unviable. It's way cheaper to keep a human alive than to build a robot construction worker and keep it running.
The only thing the robots will be used for is as guards protecting the billionaires in their bunkers.
>>
File: retard-in-a-mirror.jpg (56 KB, 878x1024)
56 KB JPG
next 20 years, next 50 years, next 1000 years..

who is the retard who may be interested in what those retired oldfags have to say?

better list the last one (or two?) projects he invested in. where is his money?

dont be a techlet
>>
This crap is no different than the space travel optimism of the 70s.
>>
>>110273372
they will be later to adopt it, because the cost of labour is cheaper there, and the robots are more expensive for them relative to their spending power.
>>
why should I have to pay for poor people to exist
>>
Biggest obstacle is the human element when it comes to automation.
For example we could have automated all of the rail operated transportation sector, but the unions prevent that by demanding to hold onto their jobs.
>>
>>110273163
what become of lazy niggers
>>
Dont worry bill the people in charge are actually conscious no not those of any of those deprecated business
>>
File: lenin.png (17 KB, 680x684)
17 KB PNG
>>110273163
Is upon you to decide if the times ahead will be painful for you or for the billionaires.
>>
>>110273163
>He thinks the next 20 years will be a painful transition.
>transition
Uh oh!



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.