Confess you rats!!
>>110280449These guys are psyoppers. Memory stocks are continuing to slide, while the rest of semis are recovering.I think this RAM bs is just sleight of hand
>>110280449I just sold ram for a silly price, I did my part
Sorry Sam
>>110280449I dont take orders from a degenerate gaylord
>>110280695>windoze using 29GB on idleseems about right
>>110280709>Distrohopper assumes a computer is idle
>>110280709>My hobby os that's stuck in perpetual beta only uses 1gb RAM!!1
The fact that I only have a browser open makes me incredibly angry.Why the fuck do we need 10GB of RAM to do the exact same thing we were doing with 256MB a couple of years ago?Can we just take all the JavaScript programmers, tie them to a tree and beat them mercilessly?
>>110280809>10.6 GB cacheLiterally unused ram is wasted ram. The swap is a bit strange though.
>>110280828>The swap is a bit strange though.I still had the OSRS launcher on. Shit is written in Java and uses all the RAM it can find as a practical joke.Literally pajet-tier technology, and some niggers still claim Java is memory efficient because "it has trash collection".Can't wait for the AI overlords to rewrite everything in Rust.
>>110280855>JavaFunny, because in my Windows screen shot above, half the ram was being taken up by a Java downloader/installer.
>>110280809It is actually technically not even js programmers' fault. I mean it is because they insist on doing ridiculous things like functional programming despite the fact there is no actual gc defined in js, and the normal gc mechanism is "user closes the page". But beyond that, the problem is just that: there is no gc or memory management mechanism in js, and different browsers use different rules. In some browsers, garbage is collected if you set something to undefined. In others, when you use delete but not when you set undefined. Still others you have to set undefined first, then delete. Some ignore all of this and will just keep everything in memory.
>>110280871I am not surprised. Disappointed? Yes. But not surprised.
>>110280449>onFucking jeets
>>110281056Welcome to ESLchan
>>110281062It's one of the most ubiquitous mistakes they make fucking hell
>>110280449everyone taking his quote out of context is a confirmd 70iq retard. he's correct that decentralized inference is less efficient.oh and i'm still laughing with my 192GBs at wait fags and gamers that said that 16GB was enough, plus prices aren't even that bad, ram costs the same per GB as it did 10 years ago.
>>110280449
>>110280449How did you know?!?!
Does he care about DDR3? I have 16 gigs of it sitting in a box under my bed
>>110280855It is pretty good on memory, but it's also a language that is easy to write in. So you get a lot of people who aren't great programmers writing in it.It doesn't help that the better enterprise stacks tend to aggressively eat as much memory as they can for speed reasons. RAM was cheap, so the more you were able to use, the better. (Assuming you used it for something useful.)
>>110280891I realized it's even worse when i was last ricing firefox userchrome in esr140. You can clearly tell that tabs are not really closed when closed. They literally don't disappear when you close them... it's just a visual hack with css and complex state management. It's probably some kind of retarded "optimization" so if someone wants to reopen closed tab it loads fast, but it makes the actual closing and clearing memory unpredictable and possibly leaking. I don't know when the tabs eventually disappear or how to control that.
>>110280449>points an my machine with teary eyes
>>110280449That looks nothing like Altman, just a touch like Landa. Try to keep your slop on one of the 16 slop generals I have filtered at the moment.
Sam's gonna freak!
