AI can't take a blood retribution demanded by a client when something goes wrong, so humans will always be important in the loop.
>>110288187>>110288195
>>110288195Yes, but fewer people will be needed overall.
>>110288226
>>110288187gm saryou clock in with this post?
>Example tasks in the benchmark
>>110288187another vibeGOD victory
So we don't need jeets now?
>>110288187"can", or "could potentially"?
>>110288187in other news, north korea has taken over 41% of all remote work
>>110288187wow 2x'd just as they ipo saar
>41%we live in a simulation
>>110288406Honestly last two iterations of models made them obsolete already with the quality they put out.
>>110288226kekhigh effort shitpost
>>110288187how much does it hallucinate?
>>110288227Covid revealed how many people are "needed" it hasn't been about that for over 100 years now.
>>110288406they have nepotism, which is the only thing that counts in slop world
>>110288406Food delivery robots can't yet walk up to your doorstep and leave the food there.
>>110288187AI mostly replaces bullshit jobs.
>>110289516That's a few months away.
>>110288227>>110288406>>110289274>>110289516>>110289524>>110289527two more weeksalways the same with AI shills>>110288281/thread
>>110288226/thread
>>11028818741% you say?
>>110288187AI can now do >41% of a-CK
it's strange that AI didn't even exist a few years ago and is objectively improving at what should be a noticeable rate, but people still predict that the current level of capability is the best it'll ever be. you see it all over the place, it's like "nothing ever happens" is so ingrained that despite things objectively happening people refuse to believe it
>>110289516Actually Figure 03 is perfectly capable of doing that fully autonomously. Figure 04 is probably going to be revealed before then end of the year as well.
>>110288281>Deliverable>computeGod I hate corpohomo newspeak
>>110289794It's cope mixed with the mantra they internalized from capitalist propaganda of "technology never displaces people, it only changes the jobs". Meanwhile the only reason it hasn't displaces people since the 50s is that labor becomes cheaper and cheaper relative to overall production. But at some point it's probably not worth bothering with employees.
>>110289794Calling it a bubble and framing every word around that like "popping" or "deflating" is also hilarious. They really think we are going back to 2017. Ed Zitron and these guys are grifters making money off this. It doesn't even matter whether it shrinks or grows anymore, it's already here to stay. The only bubble popping is the alarmists' revenue when people realize these guys are old men yelling at clouds.
>>110288187so why doesnt it
>>110290306Because of the fake jobs economy. It’s precisely why AI will fail, financially.
>>110288187>41%Wait a minute, that percentage...
>>110288187At only 10,000x the cost! I don't think you realize how little filipinos are paid
