[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: ai art vs human art.jpg (221 KB, 862x1200)
221 KB JPG
Everything that humans can do, AI does better.
>>
How well can an Ai touch magnets?
>>
>>110290542
no but all the fucking 3d printed dragon merchants at conventions sure have overpowered the shit worth supporting
>>
>>110290542
what's the mona lisa of artificial art
>>
>>110290542
Dont use my daughterwife for shitposting kthx
>>
>>110290542
Not yet, but it will kill future man-man art.
People often learn to draw/paint because not just for the end-goal of producing finished works or because they like the process (although at high levels it's never an easy or pleasurable journey), but also the feeling of exclusivity of being able to accomplish a fairly difficult task that few people can.
If anybody can now just ask an AI model to make a finished-quality artwork for them at near zero cost and within seconds~minutes, it makes it pointless to waste years of time into mastering that skill the hard way. It's just hard work that nobody will ever be able to appreciate again.
>>
>>110290542
I disagree. Pictures directly made from a prompt suck. All the good pictures are made by artists who often started from a rough draft instead of just a prompt and most importantly who heavily reworked the picture, may it only be with inpainting but often by repainting parts by themselves.
Same for AI generated code, it's only good when reworked by a human.
>>
>>110290542
I'll give a fuck about ai when you give me a robowife. Until then, human all the way, baby.
>>
>>110290705
I agree, much in the same way a woman made from a man sucks too.
>>
>>110290542
>1$
More like 500$ and you get no input during the process and no refunds and your "private" commission will still be reposted on author's discord and twitter and if you try to complain to the artist you get permanently banned on skeb.
>>
File: tmp91640aed.png (813 KB, 896x1152)
813 KB PNG
>>110290542
>>
>>110290542
>Everything that humans can do, AI does better.
in my experience, AI is steaming hot garbage if you actually have a creative vision you want to carry out and don't just want to consume whatever's put in your mouth
>make prompt
>wait for it to generate
>it's not what I wanted
>go back, adjust prompt, try again
>it's not what I wanted
>repeat until I get fed up
>"fuck it, that'll have to do I guess"
>it's still not what I wanted
at least if I were doing it myself I'd not only be directly in control, but would be actually cultivating a skill that would enable me to do it faster and better in the future
>>110290581
my concern is that we'll see something like the 1983 video game crash, where the market just gets so oversaturated with low effort slop that people just stop bothering to filter through it in search of the good stuff because it's like panning for gold in a sewer
>>
>>110290754
>my concern is that we'll see something like the 1983 video game crash, where the market just gets so oversaturated with low effort slop that people just stop bothering to filter through it in search of the good stuff because it's like panning for gold in a sewer
This isn't a real thing anymore. Lack of discoverability is not a real thing. When was the last time you heard of a thing that went bankrupt or whatever but then later became popular once it was discovered?
>>
>>110290754
I'd rather settle for AIs drawbacks and flaws than deal with petty, entitled, and immature "artists" who don't understand the concept of "work for hire".
>>
>>110290754
I’ll just ask AI to filter out the trash for me.
>>
Nobody is making money from selling AI art when you can generate it yourself.
>>
>>110290956
>>110290611
You’d rather have endless dogshit than actually something made with love?
It just sounds like all you tech anons just want to ruin shit for the sake of it. (Which you are)

Also you have been saying this for the past 5 years or so most likely you’re banking on Stockholm Syndrome.
>>
>>110290972
Wym? I see sloppers on X have patreons set up
>>
>>110291012
You've been fed sterile corposlop all your life, you don't know what real art is
>>
>>110291036
>you don't know what real art is
You’re projecting anon. Mostly because you’re too lazy to do shit yourself.
>>
>>110291012
I would rather have free dogshit than spend $500 on dogshit made with love, yes.
>>
>>110291079
I like how you’re so incompetent that you just said openAIs subscription model just to sounds smart.
Buy an ad
>>
>>110291012
I rather just draw myself.
>>
>>110291012
>You’d rather have endless dogshit than actually something made with love?
I (>>110290611) wasn't suggesting that. I'm saying that since AI models are massively devaluing ("democratizing" some will say) the efforts and prerequisites needed for being able to produce aesthetically pleasing results on your own - years of sacrifices at the very least - fewer and fewer people will decide to learn how to draw and paint manually, especially considering that some "AI artists" actually do manage to have successful Patron accounts and the like.
>>
>>110290542
>the ai art revolution is just around the corner guys!
Techcels are so autistic they still can't understand the purpose of art
>>
>>110290956
>artists bad
you do realize you can just learn to draw shit yourself, instead of e-begging for drawings, right?
>artists are gatekeeping me
gatekeeping so hard that they've filled the internet with free tutorials for you
>but I don't have the tools
you don't need the latest display tablet to do loomis
if you can afford a GPU in today's economy then you can afford an A4 sketchpad and a pack of B2 pencils (HB works at a push)
if you're on this site then you've clearly got time to spend, so the only thing holding you back is either that you're too lazy, or too busy slobbering tech billionaire cocks because they told you it's owning the libs
>>
>>110290956
so you're admitting ai art is your cope and you turn to it out of petty reserntment and entitlement?
>>
>>110291657
truly the incels of the art world
>>
File: IMG_20261110_112405990.jpg (3 MB, 3072x4096)
3 MB JPG
CNC routers and Dirt cheap power tools can already do what I can. The reality is they could have existed in parallel, but they went and burned that possibility.
I think artist had an exaggerated reaction and their community destructive witch hunt was somewhat earned.
>>
>>110290542
Based on what data would it accomplish this?
>>
>>110290590
The Space Opera one
>>
>>110290542
That's a sad fucking painting. Makes me emotional.
>>
>>110290542
It's the human's fault for not drawing tits and instead drawing sanitized and corporatized art to try and appeal to everyone desu.
>>
>>110290754
this is my experience as well, anything more specific than "uhhh boobie uhhhh BOOB uhhh breasts please" is impossible to get right. people who dont draw love it cause their idea is so shallow 100 different images could satisfy it
>>110293295
>implying that "big boobs" generated in a mathematical average of every anime style has a smaller potential audience than any original non-coomer work
you're so right anon artists online would never cater to goons to try and scrape by a meagar living. there's nobody drawing porn on the internet at all.

for any dooming artists/coders/musicians/writers/etc out there, there's never going to be a point in which you will ever regret learning and improving at something. despite the smugness ai boosters feel trying to bring everyone down to their level, in the end they have no skill, no craft, nothing to take pride in, aside from their own ineptitude
>>
>>110293214
Me too
>>
File: frjoiwajeroi.jpg (184 KB, 862x1200)
184 KB JPG
>>110290542
>>
File: dragonmaid.gif (2.09 MB, 293x293)
2.09 MB GIF
>>110294974
?
>>
>AI Art gets popular
>90% of ai art is blacked porn made by jeets
Really makes me think
>>
>>110294974
geg
>>
>>110290542
AI "art" isn't art because art is a display of human skill and imagination.
>>
>>110294974
kek
>>
>>110290542
art is a recording of the artists qualia. AI art isn't art because AI is not alive. I'm still waiting for all the pro artists to stop posting and work at mcdonalds. It seems that people don't want to look at ai and artists don't want to use it either.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.