[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.
[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous Archived
 No.110290822
 No.110290822 Archived
I want haskell but call by value
>>
Anonymous
 No.110291072
 No.110291072
>>110290822
There you go - https://github.com/ollef/sixten

It's dead twice over, though.
>>
Anonymous
 No.110291085
 No.110291085
>>110290822
what would the point be even? everything is call by reference, what matters is whether the data is immutable or not
>>
Anonymous
 No.110291096
 No.110291096
>>110291085 (me)
"call by reference" to immutable data is equivalent to "call by value"
isn't everything immutable in haskell?
>>
Anonymous
 No.110291628
 No.110291628
>>110290822
I thought about it and realized I just modular explicits in ocaml
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.