Is artificial intelligence basically a eugenics program?
>>110296485if by that you mean enabling every single retard grow and reproduce yes
>>110296498If AI ends up replacing humans then that makes no sense.
>>110296485post the one with humans
>>110297054There has never been any form of designed evolution in humans, Lebensborn Program is the most famous example, there were other efforts for this like the plunket society eugenics. But it always gets banned or outlawed cuz its bad or evil or something
>>110297101SNAP and HUD housing are both forms of designed evolution. Sort of the opposite of eugenics.
>>110296485The end result is asking Ai to create the perfect human genome sequence so we can build test tube babies.Human DNA is degrading, we need to start modifying every baby born into a baseline from something out of starship troopers so we don't end up into 5'4" mestizo hans in 4 generations. We won't just stop the degradation of the human DNA but we'll make improvements as well.
>>110296485yes, software design is eugenics. We cull the bad genes or "bugs" for a master race of functional software
>>110297101>There has never been any form of designed evolution in humansIt's called dating apps.